Can confirm that it is still in Debian stable as of 2016. Cannot test
Ubuntu now. Installing udhcpc and uninstalling isc-dhcp-client does the
trick. No need to put any package on hold. At least, when you are still
using /etc/network/interfaces. I have not tested network-manager or
anything else.
and on Ubuntu 11.04 desktop. It does not look secondary to me that
default dhcp client can't work on virtual interfaces. What about you,
ubuntu's guys?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in Ubuntu.
and on Ubuntu 11.04 desktop. It does not look secondary to me that
default dhcp client can't work on virtual interfaces. What about you,
ubuntu's guys?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Confirming this bug is still present on Ubuntu 10.10 desktop and 10.04
server.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351378
Title:
dhclient fails for virtual interfaces (IP
Confirming this bug is still present on Ubuntu 10.10 desktop and 10.04
server.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351378
Title:
dhclient fails for virtual interfaces (IP aliases)
--
Bryan McLellan wrote:
Tom Metro wrote:
I'll have to take a look at ubuntu-minimal to see what it is.
It's a meta package...
I figured that from the name, but I wondered what packages it pulled in,
and what the consequences were for removing it were.
Uninstalling it would mean that in the
Here's the summary how how to work around this bug:
First, if you're using Dnsmasq on the server-side you might run into Bug
#327703. The Dnsmasq author has a patched version available.
1. On Hardy, download and install the attached dhcp3-client dummy package:
% sudo dpkg -i
Bryan McLellan wrote:
Tom Metro wrote:
I'll have to take a look at ubuntu-minimal to see what it is.
It's a meta package...
I figured that from the name, but I wondered what packages it pulled in,
and what the consequences were for removing it were.
Uninstalling it would mean that in the
Here's the summary how how to work around this bug:
First, if you're using Dnsmasq on the server-side you might run into Bug
#327703. The Dnsmasq author has a patched version available.
1. On Hardy, download and install the attached dhcp3-client dummy package:
% sudo dpkg -i
I've opened Bug #356800, ifconfig fails to initiaize a virtual
interface with a zero IP address.
This bug should be made dependent on it. (I didn't see a way to do
that.)
--
dhclient fails for virtual interfaces (IP aliases)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351378
You received this bug
I've opened Bug #356800, ifconfig fails to initiaize a virtual
interface with a zero IP address.
This bug should be made dependent on it. (I didn't see a way to do
that.)
--
dhclient fails for virtual interfaces (IP aliases)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351378
You received this bug
Bryan McLellan wrote:
These two errors are because dhclient-script does not support alias
interfaces.
That may be partly right. I see /sbin/dhclient-script contains the
comment:
# The alias handling in here probably still sucks. -mdz
and there's clearly evidence that it is attempting to
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Tom Metro tmetro+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:
That may be partly right. I see /sbin/dhclient-script contains the
comment:
# The alias handling in here probably still sucks. -mdz
and there's clearly evidence that it is attempting to support virtual
interfaces:
Bryan McLellan wrote:
Most likely that comment and surely that code is to
support the inclusion of an alias definition in your dhclient.conf(5),
as opposed to running dhclient on an alias interface.
Ah, right. You're probably right.
The dhclient.conf(5) man page also mentions pseudo
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tom Metro tmetro+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:
Removing ubuntu-minimal sounds like something to be avoided, but there
was mention of people doing that (as a side effect of removing the
wireless package) in the bug this one was split off from, and it didn't
sound like
Bryan McLellan wrote:
These two errors are because dhclient-script does not support alias
interfaces.
That may be partly right. I see /sbin/dhclient-script contains the
comment:
# The alias handling in here probably still sucks. -mdz
and there's clearly evidence that it is attempting to
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Tom Metro tmetro+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:
That may be partly right. I see /sbin/dhclient-script contains the
comment:
# The alias handling in here probably still sucks. -mdz
and there's clearly evidence that it is attempting to support virtual
interfaces:
Bryan McLellan wrote:
Most likely that comment and surely that code is to
support the inclusion of an alias definition in your dhclient.conf(5),
as opposed to running dhclient on an alias interface.
Ah, right. You're probably right.
The dhclient.conf(5) man page also mentions pseudo
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Tom Metro tmetro+ubu...@gmail.com wrote:
Removing ubuntu-minimal sounds like something to be avoided, but there
was mention of people doing that (as a side effect of removing the
wireless package) in the bug this one was split off from, and it didn't
sound like
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address
These two errors are because dhclient-script does not support alias
interfaces. If you don't use this script, those errors go away. However
it's likely dhclient doesn't support alias interfaces at all, a
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address
These two errors are because dhclient-script does not support alias
interfaces. If you don't use this script, those errors go away. However
it's likely dhclient doesn't support alias interfaces at all, a
I believe this is a missing feature of ISC's dhclient. I can't find any
mention in the source of supporting virtual/alias interfaces outside of
the alias declaration in dhclient.conf(5) that allows you to specify a
static address to be applied to an alias interface in addition to the
address
Commenting on some of the comments in Bug #123773.
In Bug #123773
Jamie Strandboge wrote:
...though ifup (and ifdown) will give that error, the interface
comes up fine, and is pingable
In this case the interface doesn't come up.
In comment
Forum threads relating to this issue:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=918015
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=515162
--
dhclient fails for virtual interfaces (IP aliases)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351378
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Attached is an archive containing the output of:
# strace -ff -F -o /tmp/dhclient.strace dhclient eth0:0
There is already a pid file /var/run/dhclient.pid with pid 134519072
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.6
Copyright 2004-2007 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights
Commenting on some of the comments in Bug #123773.
In Bug #123773
Jamie Strandboge wrote:
...though ifup (and ifdown) will give that error, the interface
comes up fine, and is pingable
In this case the interface doesn't come up.
In comment
Forum threads relating to this issue:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=918015
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=515162
--
dhclient fails for virtual interfaces (IP aliases)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351378
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Attached is an archive containing the output of:
# strace -ff -F -o /tmp/dhclient.strace dhclient eth0:0
There is already a pid file /var/run/dhclient.pid with pid 134519072
Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.6
Copyright 2004-2007 Internet Systems Consortium.
All rights
28 matches
Mail list logo
