[Bug 357846] Re: [Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta system into a production system.

2009-04-16 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
Originally the interval was supposed to be two days in the pre-release
period, and seven days in the post-release period. It was changed to
seven days for both, on the grounds that a large proportion of
alpha/beta testers will be updating manually. I have no idea what
proportion that's actually true for: if it's a low proportion, it would
make sense to change the pre-release interval back to two days.

-- 
[Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta 
system into a production system.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 357846] Re: [Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta system into a production system.

2009-04-16 Thread C. Cooke
Thanks for commenting. I realise I submitted this a little late for
Jaunty, but I think it's still a worthwhile thing to consider,
especially for Karmic.

It all boils down to what most of the people using pre-release Ubuntu
distributions are doing. Some of them are, of course, going to be very
proactive about testing and bug reporting and running updates manually
multiple times a day. I've been in that group before and doubtless will
be again; it all depends on how much time I can spare. For this release,
I'm in the other group: I want to submit bugs and get testing done, but
I don't currently have a lot of time to dedicate to it. So I installed
Jaunty as soon as it was stable enough not to be unusable (on my primary
laptop, but only after the secondary system was fully synced and ready
just in case) and started using it. I've kept this system updated
manually roughly every three to four days, but that's not been often
enough to submit decent bugs for some of the problems I've had. I'd be
very surprised if I were alone in doing this. It sounds like you don't
actually know the figures yourself - which would suggest that the
*safest* option is the shorter period.

-- 
[Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta 
system into a production system.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 357846] Re: [Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta system into a production system.

2009-04-15 Thread Michael Vogt
Thanks for your bugreport.

I have subscribed the design team for input on this.

-- 
[Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta 
system into a production system.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 357846] Re: [Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta system into a production system.

2009-04-10 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Triaged

-- 
[Jaunty] Updating every seven days is inimical to the process of turning a beta 
system into a production system.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357846
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs