[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-10-18 Thread Paul Smith
Installer from a karmic AMD64 desktop version (10/13/09) didn't find the
second RAID set.

Even when full boot with Live CD, GParted also didn't properly see the
2nd set.

Details: Tested with 2 hard drives x 1.0TB, Raid0 (ICH10R), splitted in
two sets (300GB + 1.7GB). As mentioned before on the thread, the reason
for such configuration was just bare raw performance. Btw, didn't
install Karmic on the first set because it's already being fully used
for other purposes and OS's.

I'm most positive that unfortunately this will slip throw on to the
final 9.10 release.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-10-18 Thread Tormod Volden
Paul, did you wipe any HPA like in comment 22? Otherwise, you must have
a different issue (although the symptoms are the same) so please file
new bug report using ubuntu-bug dmraid and attach the dmraid -ay -ddd
-vvv output.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-10-14 Thread quequotion
Would this fix have any effect on the bug with installing a new system
to raid or upgrading a system already installed to raid? I'll give it a
try later but I'm far from my PC at the moment.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-08-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package dmraid - 1.0.0.rc15-11build1

---
dmraid (1.0.0.rc15-11build1) karmic; urgency=low

  * Fakesync from Debian

dmraid (1.0.0.rc15-11) unstable; urgency=low

  * [ce4e2dc] 15_activate_multiple_raid_sets.patch: Continue onto all
raid sets instead of returning after processing the first. (LP: #401713)
  * [58a1426] debian/initramfs/dmraid.initramfs-local-top/dmraid: Check
the exit code before parsing output, thanks to Tormod Volden.
(Closes: #542256) (LP: #415280, #376792)
  * [91d2b67] Updated to standards version 3.8.3 (No changes needed)

 -- Luke Yelavich them...@ubuntu.com   Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:29:15 +1000

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-08-18 Thread Tormod Volden
I don't see 15_activate_multiple_raid_sets.patch has been released in
Karmic yet, so setting back bug status.


** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-08-04 Thread EagleDM
The road to success:


I'm happy to report that after doing this 2 steps,  DMRAID is working, finally, 
perfectly fine with Karmic.


1- use HDAT2 utility to completly wipe out the HPA from both disks.

2- update kernel to 2.6.31-5


I'm confident that most DMRAID problems are due to that freaking HPA area on 
disks, and HDAT2 utility REALLY helped,  not only does DMRAID now works with 
the new kernel,  I am no longer experiencing the Offline Member message that 
drove me crazy since memorial times.


Thank you all for your effort!

PD:  We need to spread this,  most problems with RAID could be solved
easily by eliminating the HPA area on HDDs.

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Giuseppe Iuculano (giuseppe-iuculano) = (unassigned)

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-23 Thread EagleDM
Well well,  Jaunty fresh install,  libata.ignore_HPA=0   in kernel,
sudo apt-get install dmraid

this is what I got:

dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay
[sudo] password for daniel: 
RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 already active
RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1 already active
dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -an
dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv  
WARN: locking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: asr discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: ddf1discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt37x  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt45x  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw metadata discovered   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: jmicron discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: lsi discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: nvidia  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: sil discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: via discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: asr discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: ddf1discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt37x  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt45x  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw metadata discovered   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: jmicron discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: lsi discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: nvidia  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: sil discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: via discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: asr discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: ddf1discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt37x  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt45x  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: isw discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: jmicron discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: lsi discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: nvidia  discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: sil discovering   
NOTICE: /dev/sda: via discovering   
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa  
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa  
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdc to RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa 
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa 
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdb to RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 to 16
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1 to 16
RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 was activated
RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1 was activated
INFO: Activating GROUP raid set isw_dcjdajjhfa
NOTICE: discovering partitions on isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
NOTICE: /dev/mapper/isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0: dos discovering
NOTICE: discovering partitions on isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: /dev/mapper/isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1: dos discovering
WARN: unlocking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa, path /dev/sdc


As you can see, everything works perfectly,  now Im definetly sure it is
the kernel in Karmic,  gonna try your version too.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-23 Thread EagleDM
Again, with your patched version, everything went perfectly fine in
Jaunty, I don't have your knoledge here, but, my gut instint tells me
this is definetly an issue with the kernel 2.6.31 in Karmic, we should
comment this to the kernel devs, it could be a disaster to have a non-
working dmraid in Karmic due to this...

here it is the log with your patched version too:

dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv
WARN: locking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: asr discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: ddf1discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt37x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt45x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw discovering 
DEBUG: isw metadata found at 150039944192 from probe at 150039944192

NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw metadata discovered
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: via discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: asr discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: ddf1discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt37x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt45x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw discovering
DEBUG: isw metadata found at 150039944192 from probe at 150039944192

NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw metadata discovered
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: via discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: asr discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: ddf1discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt37x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt45x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: isw discovering
DEBUG: not isw at 64105741312
DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset.
DEBUG: not isw at 64104659456 
NOTICE: /dev/sda: jmicron discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sda: lsi discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sda: nvidia  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sda: sil discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sda: via discovering 
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdc to RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa 
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa 
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdb to RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 to 16
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1 to 16
RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0 was activated
RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1 was activated
INFO: Activating GROUP raid set isw_dcjdajjhfa
NOTICE: discovering partitions on isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
NOTICE: /dev/mapper/isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0: dos discovering
NOTICE: discovering partitions on isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: /dev/mapper/isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1: dos discovering
WARN: unlocking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume0, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa_Volume1, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_dcjdajjhfa
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_dcjdajjhfa, path /dev/sdc
dan...@lizzie:~$

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-23 Thread EagleDM
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Giuseppe Iuculano (giuseppe-iuculano)

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-22 Thread EagleDM
I'm installing Jaunty right now :)

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread danwood76
When you wiped the disk and created the single array could you post the output 
of the above debug command for us. (sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv)
Its a bit annoying trying to debug something when you don't give the full debug 
output as you go.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread danwood76
Also could you try installing Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty) with the two array setup.
It would be interesting to know weather this issue is visible in the stable 
release.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread EagleDM
Going to try Jaunty right away and post results.


Created a single array, same results, cannot be activated 

Strange, when I create 2 arrays, only the first one gets activated, when
I create a single one, it behaves exactly like the second one.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread danwood76
When you get to the stage of cannot be activated post the debug output for 
comparison.
sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread EagleDM
Here you have:

dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv
NOTICE: creating directory /var/lock/dmraid
WARN: locking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock   
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: asr discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: ddf1discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt37x  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt45x  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw metadata discovered  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: jmicron discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: lsi discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: nvidia  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: sil discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: via discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: asr discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: ddf1discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt37x  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt45x  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw metadata discovered  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: jmicron discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: lsi discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: nvidia  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: sil discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: via discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: asr discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: ddf1discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt37x  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt45x  discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: isw discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: jmicron discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: lsi discovering  
NOTICE: /dev/sda: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: via discovering
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
NOTICE: added /dev/sdc to RAID set isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
NOTICE: added /dev/sdb to RAID set isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_bifiajiffg_raid0 to 16
RAID set isw_bifiajiffg_raid0 was not activated
INFO: Activating GROUP raid set isw_bifiajiffg
WARN: unlocking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bifiajiffg_raid0
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bifiajiffg_raid0, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bifiajiffg_raid0, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bifiajiffg
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bifiajiffg, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bifiajiffg, path /dev/sdc
dan...@lizzie:~$

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Hi,


EagleDM ha scritto:

 RAID set isw_bifiajiffg_raid0 was not activated


I just uploaded a dmraid version in my PPA that should fix your issue, please
test it:

https://edge.launchpad.net/~giuseppe-iuculano/+archive/ppa


dmraid - 1.0.0.rc15-11~ppa1 for jaunty

dmraid - 1.0.0.rc15-11~ppa2 for karmic


Cheers,
Giuseppe.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread EagleDM
Will try it right away ! thank you !!

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread EagleDM
Ok, here is getting really weird, take a look at this..

With only 1 array, same as before, with 2 arrays, this happens.

an...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay
[sudo] password for daniel: 
RAID set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0 already active
RAID set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1 was not activated


the detailed report says this:

dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv
WARN: locking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: asr discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: ddf1discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt37x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt45x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw discovering 
DEBUG: isw metadata found at 150039944192 from probe at 150039944192

NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw metadata discovered
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: via discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: asr discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: ddf1discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt37x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt45x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw discovering
DEBUG: isw metadata found at 150039944192 from probe at 150039944192

NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw metadata discovered
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: via discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: asr discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: ddf1discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt37x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt45x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: isw discovering
DEBUG: not isw at 64105741312
DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset.
DEBUG: not isw at 64104659456
NOTICE: /dev/sda: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: via discovering
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdc to RAID set isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdb to RAID set isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0 to 16
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1 to 16
RAID set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0 already active
RAID set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1 was not activated
INFO: Activating GROUP raid set isw_bhhagfbig
NOTICE: discovering partitions on isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
NOTICE: /dev/mapper/isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0: dos discovering
WARN: unlocking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhhagfbig_Volume0, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhhagfbig_Volume1, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bhhagfbig
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhhagfbig, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhhagfbig, path /dev/sdc


Something is very wrong here and I think it has to do with something else, 
also, after executing dmraid, I can no longer boot (this bug is what happens to 
me after the first boot:  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/398059)


Hope this helps

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread EagleDM
It got my attention this line:

DEBUG: not isw at 64105741312
DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset.
DEBUG: not isw at 64104659456


which was not before with the standard dmraid rc15, could this has something to 
do with ICR10R changing the way it creates arrays ?

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
EagleDM ha scritto:
 DEBUG: not isw at 64105741312
 DEBUG: isw trying hard coded -2115 offset.
 DEBUG: not isw at 64104659456
 
 
 which was not before with the standard dmraid rc15, could this has something 
 to do with ICR10R changing the way it creates arrays ?


Yes, but please try with ignore_hpa=0

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread EagleDM
Already set to ignore_hpa=0

If I don't pass that parameter to the kernel, it just destroys my
complete array, next time I turn on the PC the array displays as
Failed  and do not come alive never more :(


So, as I stated in the begining, I always use the ignore_hpa=0

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-21 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
EagleDM ha scritto:
 Already set to ignore_hpa=0
 
 If I don't pass that parameter to the kernel, it just destroys my
 complete array, next time I turn on the PC the array displays as
 Failed  and do not come alive never more :(
 
 
 So, as I stated in the begining, I always use the ignore_hpa=0
 

In case you are trying the patched dmraid version with karmic, can you try it
with jaunty please?

Cheers,
Giuseppe.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-20 Thread danwood76
When you say you create 2 arrays why are you not creating 1 array and
partitioning it?

Could you post the output of 'sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv' which will give
a detailed version of whats going on.

regards,
Danny

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-20 Thread EagleDM
shortstroking the first partition gives me better overall performance
than just partitioning, at least on every program I tried, but,
considering the problems I'm having I think I will have to do a single
array with partitions.

I will give you the output as soon as possible

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-20 Thread EagleDM
Here we go:

dan...@lizzie:~$ sudo dmraid -ay -ddd -vvv
WARN: locking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock  
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: asr discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: ddf1discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt37x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: hpt45x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: isw metadata discovered 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: jmicron discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: lsi discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: nvidia  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: pdc discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: sil discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdc: via discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: asr discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: ddf1discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt37x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: hpt45x  discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw discovering 
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: isw metadata discovered
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sdb: via discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: asr discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: ddf1discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt37x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: hpt45x  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: isw discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: jmicron discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: lsi discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: nvidia  discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: pdc discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: sil discovering
NOTICE: /dev/sda: via discovering
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: not found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdc to RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: searching isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: _find_set: found isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
NOTICE: added /dev/sdb to RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0 to 16
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdb
DEBUG: checking isw device /dev/sdc
DEBUG: set status of set isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1 to 16
RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0 was activated
RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1 was not activated
INFO: Activating GROUP raid set isw_bhcifgjhfa
NOTICE: discovering partitions on isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
NOTICE: /dev/mapper/isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0: dos discovering
WARN: unlocking /var/lock/dmraid/.lock
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume0, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhcifgjhfa_Volume1, path /dev/sdc
DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set isw_bhcifgjhfa
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhcifgjhfa, path /dev/sdb
DEBUG: freeing device isw_bhcifgjhfa, path /dev/sdc

As you can see, it always activate Volume0 (first RAID0) but not the
second Volume1 (also RAID0)

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-20 Thread EagleDM
Also, right after making the array in BIOS, booting to Ubuntu and
installing dmraid you can get that, but, as soon as you try to boot the
PC again, it will get stuck in No such device (next boot) in an
infinite loop and the only way to fix it is to destroy the Volume1, boot
and remove dmraid, so it seems this is pretty serious.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-20 Thread EagleDM
More testing,  wipe clean both disk, creating a single RAID array of the
entire disk bring about the same problem.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 401713] Re: DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R

2009-07-20 Thread EagleDM
my bug seems related to this bug

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/398059

I am experiencing the same issues.

-- 
DMRAID only detect first subset on Intel ICH10R
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401713
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs