[Bug 403144] Re: vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

2009-10-06 Thread Soren Hansen
Marking as invalid. Eric's analysis is correct: The correct kernel is installed. What Daniel sees is simply an artifact of the way the -virtual kernel is packaged. ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

[Bug 403144] Re: vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

2009-10-06 Thread Chuck Short
** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- vmbuilder does not respect flavour option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 403144] Re: vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

2009-10-06 Thread Soren Hansen
Marking as invalid. Eric's analysis is correct: The correct kernel is installed. What Daniel sees is simply an artifact of the way the -virtual kernel is packaged. ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

[Bug 403144] Re: vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

2009-07-30 Thread Eric Heydrick
I noticed this too. Turns out it's not an issue with vmbuilder but rather with how the virtual kernel is now packaged. The -virtual kernel is virtually the same as the -server kernel so Ubuntu stopped building a separate -virtual kernel. See bug #307924, comment #5 for details. vmbuilder is

[Bug 403144] Re: vmbuilder does not respect flavour option

2009-07-22 Thread Daniel Silva
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29398304/Dependencies.txt -- vmbuilder does not respect flavour option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --