[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-02-04 Thread Roman
Very strange, now I have reinstalled updates from xorg-edgers again and indeed 
found slight improvement of the performance! Maybe thanks to the newer version 
of mesa. Synaptic says mesa is 7.8.0 now (was 1.6.0), Intel driver is 2.10.0 
(was 2.9.0), xserver-xorg-core is 1.6.5 (was 1.6.4).
However, the performance improvement is small - Tux racer now says 18-22 FPS 
rather than 15-20. But at least Euphoria screensaver does not flicker now, as 
it was constantly doing since Jaunty. Hope this trend will remain in future 
versions.

Forgot to mention that tests in the above post and here were done with
compositing (kwin) disabled.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-28 Thread Roman
Some Extreme Tux Racer tests (intel GMA X3100 (GL360)):

linux version on linux (Karmic): 15-20 FPS
windows version on linux (Karmic) via wine: 15-20 FPS
windows version on windows (Vista) on the same computer: 40-50 FPS
So it looks that linux intel video driver is at least 2-2.5 times more slow 
than it could be.

Installing new Xorg (only drivers or the whole) from ppa caused very
strange things: glxgears reported FPS several times larger than for the
default configuration, Tux reported the same 15-20 FPS, but actual
apparent performance was very bad in both cases, no more than 10 FPS.

Is there any way to install 2.4 driver on Karmic? I found it in the
Jaunty x-retro ppa, but there is no 2.4 driver for Karmic.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-17 Thread bigbrovar
@Andres Monroy-Hernandez I tried follwing your tip but I am still
getting same performace no improvement here :(

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-16 Thread warjowuch
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = intel linux graphics (intellinuxgraphics-2008q4)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-16 Thread Andres Monroy-Hernandez
I upgraded Xorg and its drivers using the Xorg edgers PPA and now
performance is good.

http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates/ubuntu
http://ppa.launchpad.net/xorg-edgers/drivers-only/ubuntu

I now have Xorg 1:7.4.3

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-06 Thread pfxcore
im on karmic and using gm965 on this guide
what can i say about that
1 - u follow the howto to upgrade jaunty driver
2 - open synaptic package on local/obsolete
3 - force install for all intel driver
4 - make this remain libgl1-mesa-dev libgl1-mesa-glx libglu1-mesa 
libglu1-mesa-dev mesa-common-dev
5 - and reboot..
6 - your intel driver now is really fast 
7 - i can play games without any problem 
8 - hope this help

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-06 Thread bigbrovar
Could you be more specific, which guide do are you referring to, and can
you provide a link to the how to?

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2010-01-06 Thread jerrylamos
Ubuntu Forums 
Multimedia  Video
HOWTO: Jaunty Intel Graphics Performance Guide

is probably what pfxcore is referring to.  See:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1130582

I don't remember having much luck when I was trying to follow the
suggestions;  perhaps you might do better

I'm usually using lucid lynx 10.04 which isn't much different than
karmic koala 9.10 on intel performance.  When it's running.  Lucid is
Alpha level, unstable, and prone to booting to black screen and desktop
hangs, seems to be typical of Ubuntu development code as they try new
things.

Jerry

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-12-19 Thread Indian Art
I had similar problems but then I manually set it right with the following 
instructions:
HOWTO: Wrong/Low Resolution and flicker
The Xorg server - the code that provides a graphic display - is very good about 
determining what an attached monitor can do. There are limitations.

This HOWTO explains one process for obtaining a rock-solid graphics
screen within the constraints of your hardware's abilities. There are
many other ways to do this.

Overview of the problem:
When Xorg starts, it tries to figure out what kind of monitor you have via 
DDC/CI and EDID protocols. If your monitor and cabling are first-rate, you will 
never need to care about any of this. (Yay!)

If not, Xorg will pick a safe VESA resolution and use that: probably
not at all what you expected, and not likely to be satisfactory. (Grr.)

Lucky for us all, Xorg is highly configurable and it's very easy to get the 
exact resolution(s) that you want, deserve, and yes, paid-for with your 
invested time.
Warning: If you are terrified by a Linux command line, at least TRY to follow 
this procedure. It won't hurt you and it will help.

Still with me? Then let's proceed:


Step #1: What kind of monitor do you have? What are its capabilities? What is 
its maximum resolution?
Virtually every monitor vendor will publish the specifications for their 
products on the web. You can find them if you just look but first, you'll need 
the Vendor Name and Model of that monitor. It will be printed on a plate or 
tag, glued, screwed, or riveted to the back, top, bottom, or side of your 
monitor. Go look for it now. Write that information down and keep it handy.
Step #2: Fetch your specs.
Bring up a browser window and search for that model eg, 'dell 3007wfphc'.

Look for any site with details and specifications; the vendor's site is
best, but most review sites will provide specifications too.

Ideally, you will find the Horizontal Sync range, expressed in
kilohertz (KHz or khz), and the Vertical Refresh range, expressed in
hertz (Hz).

If you found that, write it down like:
Code:
HorizSync 49.31 - 98.71
VertRefresh 60
and proceed to Step #4.

If not, then look for the Maximum Resolution. This will be listed as 
something like 2560 x 1600 at 60Hz. Write that down.
Step #3: Calculate the frequencies from the specified resolution.
Open a terminal window (Applications - Accessories - Terminal) and enter
Code:
cvt 2560 1600 60
Hit Enter. This will output the following
Code:
# 2560x1600 59.99 Hz (CVT 4.10MA) hsync: 99.46 kHz; pclk: 348.50 MHz
Modeline 2560x1600_60.00  348.50  2560 2760 3032 3504  1600 1603 1609 1658 
-hsync +vsync
Aha! The vertical refresh will be exactly 59.99Hz and the horizontal sync will 
be 99.46KHz. Write it down as:

Code:
HorizSync 99.46
VertRefresh 59.99
Step #4: Create a basic xorg.conf
Write the following commands down on paper because we're going to turn off the 
GUI and run a few commands from the console.

Flip to the text console via Ctrl+Alt+F1 and log in.

Execute these commands:
Code:
sudo /etc/init.d/gdm stop
sudo X -configure
sudo /etc/init.d/gdm start ; exit
(ignore any notices about the new way of starting/stopping services - those 
new ways work, and so does this way, but this way works on all releases)

You're back at the GUI login screen, so log in and bring up the rest of these 
directions.
Step #5: Edit the basic configuration.
Edit the new configuration by opening a terminal window and running the 
following command:
Code:
sudo gedit xorg.conf.new
Scroll down to the entry
Code:
Section Monitor
Identifier   Monitor0
VendorName   Monitor Vendor
ModelNameMonitor Model
EndSection
Add lines after the Identifier label to include the values you found (or 
calculated). The entry for that Dell monitor will look like:
Code:
Section Monitor
Identifier   Monitor0
HorizSync49.31 - 98.71
VertRefresh  60.0
VendorName   Monitor Vendor
ModelNameMonitor Model
EndSection
Note: If you appreciate details, fill in the VendorName and ModelName values 
(within quotes) like
Code:
Section Monitor
Identifier   Monitor0
HorizSync49.31 - 98.71
VertRefresh  60.0
VendorName   Dell
ModelName3007WFP-HC
EndSection
Step #6: Save the new configuration.
Save that file. Then click File - Save As (in gedit) and save the file as 
/etc/X11/xorg.conf then exit gedit.

Now, you have a new Xorg configuration installed where Xorg can see it, and you 
have a backup in your home folder.
Step #7: Restart X and test.
In the terminal window, enter
Code:
sudo /etc/init.d/gdm restart
You'll be logged off and the login screen should appear a few seconds later at 
full resolution. Congratulations, you have just done what your graphics card 
tried to do, but failed.
--

YIKES: If the screen goes black and stays that way, then you have either
not provided the correct information for your monitor or your graphics
card cannot run that monitor at these 

[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-12-19 Thread Indian Art
My problem was solved by following the above instructions given by
Giblet5 from Ubuntu Forums. Thanks Giblet5!

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-12-19 Thread ilna
Indian Art,

Sorry, the problem you have resolved and decribed here(citing Giblet5)
has absolutely nothing related to the bug.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-12-16 Thread Francisco Villalobos
Some effects are slow randomly and slows the system, i have Intel 945GM.

Note: The best driver for my Intel 945GM was on Ubuntu 8.10.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-12-12 Thread onyxrev
I am also experiencing very sluggish performance recently, while it was
quite fast around the 9.10 release.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-18 Thread Bartek Celary
After upgrading to Karmic, my display wont come back after it goes to
sleep... If you need further logs - let me know.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-13 Thread Oleksiy Lukin
After upgrade X works only in log-graphics mode. I seek and tired of
ubuntu stories with intel graphics.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-12 Thread almadana
I don't know if it's been already pointed out, but Xorg CPU load can
rise as high as 99% (that is my 2 CPUs running top load) when I resize a
window or switch between desktops!!.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-11 Thread almadana
I switched to 2.6.30, and got a reasonable 1200x720(or whatever)
resolution back!! Compiz compositing can't be enabled, and the overall
performance when drawing windows is still a bit turtlier (I meant slow).

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-10 Thread almadana
I just upgraded to Karmic, and windows composition was broken, the whole
display became sluggish, with a max resolution of 800x600!

I disabled the UXA line in xorg.conf without effect.

Card:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated 
Graphics Controller (rev 02)

Xserver:
xserver-xorg-core 2:1.6.4-2ubuntu4
xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu2

Kernel
2.6.31-14-generic

I'll try to boot 2.6.30 and see what happens.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-09 Thread Paul L.
Running Kubuntu Jaunty 9.04 KDE 4.3.2. My Graphics consist of:

Graphics:  Card Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics 
Controller X.Org 1.6.0 Res: 1440x...@59.9hz
GLX Renderer Mesa DRI Intel 945GM GEM 20090326 2009Q1 RC2 x86/MMX/SSE2 GLX 
Version 1.4 Mesa 7.4

In Kubuntu Karmic 10.04, desktop performance is 'not good' and I have no
compositing. I had to return to Jaunty.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-02 Thread Henrik Peytz
Another vote for intel drivers not working optimally. Installed netbook-
remix interface but the interface is sluggish to say the least. Moving
windows around is slow and choppy (the larger the windows, the slower
and choppier it is moving it around).

x...@sephiroth:~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82Q33 Express DRAM Controller (rev 02)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82Q33 Express Integrated 
Graphics Controller (rev 02)

Card is an integrated Intel GMA 3100.

Gonna try the Xorg-edgers ppa and see if it makes a difference.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-02 Thread Popoi
Same problem in:

lspci | egrep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-11-02 Thread roadSurfer
Same here:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82865G Integrated Graphics 
Controller (rev 02)

With compiz:
Compiz benchmwark - circa 18-20fps
Tux racer fullscreen - 5.5fps
glxgears window - 3400 frames in 5 secs
glxgears fullscreen - 240 frames in 5 secs

Without compiz:
Tux racer fullscreen - 6.0fps
glxgears window - 3240 frames in 5 secs
glxgears fullscreen - 300 frames in 5 secs

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-29 Thread PatrikG
Confirmed on this as well:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)

Performance is stuttering, windows are blurred for about 0.5s when
opening, glxgears runs smooth for a couple of seconds, then stops and
then continues. Performance has dropped from ~2800 frames/sec to ~1500
with glxgears.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-29 Thread chesterm
I confirm this too:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-29 Thread Bram Avontuur
Same problem here, with latest Karmic:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series
Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)

Linux li3910 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:04:26 UTC
2009 i686 GNU/Linux

Tux racer windowed/fullscreen at 640x480 gets 8fps, glxgears 1800-200
frames per 5 seconds.

It's about as bad as it was in Jaunty. Tux racer in vista on the same
machine runs many times faster.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-26 Thread bigbrovar
I don't know if its any related to this blog, but graphic performance on
my kubuntu 9.10 just don't cut it. The whole system is so slow and
laddy. Is there anything I can do to improve performance. Maybe
downgrade to the version of xserver which ships with jaunty? :( . am
using the Intel GMi965

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-21 Thread Emil Oppeln-Bronikowski
I can confirm this, too. Running glxgears yelds ~1200 FPS in 5 seconds.
Overall interface seems laggy.

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-12 Thread Forceflow
Another vote for this:

LSPCI returns:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML 
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

General sloppyness, worse with Firefox. I have UXA enabled in my
xorg.conf, but I think that's default since Karmic?

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-08 Thread Andres Monroy-Hernandez
One more vote for this. My lscpi returns:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-07 Thread hewbert
After a little testing, it does seem that the culprit (in my case) is
xserver-xorg-video-intel-2.8.  I reverted to 2.4 and things were
definitely improved, but there were obvious side-effects to reverting.

Oddly enough, running glxgears reports a better frame rate under 2.8,
but is definitely choppy, whereas 2.4 gave a lower frame rate, but was
not choppy.

I'm just going by the overall feel of things, so I apologize for the
lack of concrete data on this.  I'm more than willing to provide more
information if it'd be beneficial.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-06 Thread sitronen
The same like Jacob Peddicord  wrote: On the 945GME good performance even with 
compiz, booting the .30-kernel. Poor performance with the .31-kernel.
Like Cyan Davies wrote- no compiz with kernel .31.
Is the bug related to bug #442197?

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-06 Thread hewbert
Seems like performance here has degraded a bit in the past few days as
well.  There's been so many updates it's hard to say what the culprit
may be ;) (perhaps the kernel bumps)..

I don't have the i965, but it sounds related:
Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/PM/GMS, 943/940GML and 945GT Express Memory 
Controller Hub (rev 03)
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML 
Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express 
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)

I haven't done any official benchmarking, but window redrawing does
seem to lack the performance it did a few days ago, and I've noticed a
bit more flickering with various other things (noticeably the 'busy'
mouse cursor, drawing windows, etc).

2.6.31-12-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP
xserver-xorg-video-intel:  2:2.8.1-1ubuntu2
libgl1-mesa-dri:  7.6.0

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-06 Thread ilna
I have noticed the same degrading as you, Hhewbert , but I guess it is
related to changings in kernel's scheduler. Besides less DE responsivity
I catched some other slowdown. Say, MPD player clicks when some JVM
application is eating CPU actively (such building NetBeans from
sources).

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-06 Thread ilna
(ugh.. Sorry for typo in your name, Hewbert!)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-05 Thread Shady Samir
I upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic. I cant set my screen resolution higher
than 800x600 and the PC does not wake up from display sleep. I'm on an
integrated Intel 82945G/GZ display

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-05 Thread Rafael Bedendo

After inserting a second monitor, use it and then cut it down quite a 
performance and visual effects have also been disabled.

Excuse my English.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-04 Thread Cian Davis
Not sure this is the right bug. There's a few bugs with similar
problems.

I upgraded to Karmic yesterday on a Dell Latitude D410 with a 915GM.
Having significant problems with X.org. Absorbing 100% of CPU a lot of
the time. Seems to be with Mozilla apps - Firefox and Thunderbird. Seems
to be redrawing in these apps. Worse with heavy Web 2.0/AJAX apps on
Firefox.

Compiz is disabled and cannot be enabled. The weird thing is I managed
to enable Compiz last night and everything was fine. Will attempt to
refine the problem.

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-04 Thread ilna
Cian, look at '/dev/dri' - have you something there? Probably it is
another problem with workaround to reinstall libdrm2 and libdrm-intel1.
There is a dedicated bug wrt /dev/dri problem (try to search).

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-10-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Tags added: kubuntu

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-09-26 Thread Tel
glxgears runs smooth now. Seems to genlock at exactly 60 frames per
second.

Linux version 2.6.31-10-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.4.1
(Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu1) ) #35-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 22 17:33:42 UTC 2009

xserver-xorg-video-intel   2:2.8.1-1ubuntu2
libgl1-mesa-dri7.6.0~git20090817.7c422387-0ubuntu5

Extreme tux racer is down to around 15 frames per second.

pinball now runs at 55 fps or sometimes down to 50, Tungsten Graphics,
Inc. Mesa DRI Intel(R) 945GME GEM 20090712 2009Q2 RC3 x86/MMX/SSE2

Same processor as above (intel Atom 1600MHz hyperthreading)

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-09-25 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416073] Re: [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

2009-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed:

- [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
+ [i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again

-- 
[i965] [karmic][GM965] low intel graphics performance - again
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416073
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs