I'm working to remove grub1 from the seeds, and I'm now wondering if
this is still the case. I.e. if we can drop grub1, and only have grub2
for e.g. fakeraid installs et.al. Wouldn't this support be visible in
like installer changes too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This is still an issue in Ubuntu 10.04 Beta as well.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Wouldn't that be bug 527401, which is fixed in later daily builds?
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
With lucid alpha3 (alternate) installer this is still a problem. I'm
looking a the exact error (UUIDs not supported) right now
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I'm if I mount /proc in the chroot is seems to work:
chroot /target
mount /proc
grub-install --modules=raid /dev/sda
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:46:02PM -, Charlie Burnett wrote:
its great we can run 9.10 with grub legacy, however are we ever going to
see grub 2 working with fake raid partitions?
I expect it'll work in 10.04 - Felix recently mentioned upstream that
he's got it working.
--
Installer
its great we can run 9.10 with grub legacy, however are we ever going to
see grub 2 working with fake raid partitions?
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I do have the same problem here. I have upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic.
apt-get install grub2 quits with the following error:
grub-probe: error: no mapping exists for `isw_eceeeacaf_diskset1'.
As much I would like to see this error properly fixed, is there an
alternative fix, e.g. by specifying
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 08:33:11AM -, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
I do have the same problem here. I have upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic.
apt-get install grub2 quits with the following error:
grub-probe: error: no mapping exists for `isw_eceeeacaf_diskset1'.
As much I would like to
Somewhat Related
I used the 9.10 Alt CD on my machine with ICH10 Raid 1 (Mirrored).
Installed Ubuntu to another drive. (the RAID array is just file storage)
Upon installing, it asked if I wanted to use the RAID hardware...I said
yes.
after installing, Ubuntu still sees these as separate
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:01:17PM -, rkolb86 wrote:
Somewhat Related
Not really - it's another bug with the same kind of hardware, certainly,
but not a bug in grub. Please file a separate report.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 01:54:24PM -, Paul Taylor wrote:
I struck the same problem with the 19 October daily build of karmic-
alternate-amd64.iso (I didn't try the livecd.)
Oh dear. Could you attach /var/log/installer/syslog, please?
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
I struck the same problem with the 19 October daily build of karmic-
alternate-amd64.iso (I didn't try the livecd.)
During the installation, grub2 (grub-pc) was installed - not grub - and
failed to detect the dmraid devices as above.
Booting into rescue mode. Was asked if I wanted to initialise
This is good news I will Test and report at the weekend.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thanks for the reply Felix,
it doesn't help me but at least I understand some of the reasoning
behind this. I guess karmic gets a thumbs down from me based on this
regression alone. At lot of people installing Karmic for the first
time, are going to get the hump when there install fails at the
Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2009, 09:51 + schrieb Jim Bailey:
I wonder if the possibility of using grub1 can be included in
the installer.
For dmraids always GRUB Legacy was forced inside grub-installer and this
hasn't change even since Debian switched to GRUB 2 by default too.
But it seems
Indeed, I think it's just that grub is no longer on the CD. That wasn't
intentional as we need it for this and other reasons; I've committed a
fix.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a
revno: 1584
committer: Colin Watson cjwat...@canonical.com
branch nick: ubuntu.karmic
timestamp: Wed 2009-10-14 21:40:44 +0100
message:
ensure that grub is shipped on live CDs, since it's needed for dmraid (LP:
#436340)
** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) = ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
** Changed in:
Same:
Fake raid on a Moderboard MSI, nVidia Raid Controller MCP55.
I had try to install Ubuntu 9.10 (alternate and server), but i can't
install Grub.
If i install 9.04 (server) and then upgrade to 9.10... all works, but i
cant upgrade to Grub2
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
I did a virtual machine in VirtualBox that had 2 hard drives, and I
tried an installlation using the linux software RAID provided by the
mdadm package, and will a bit of extra legwork, it managed to boot the
RAID0 system using grub2.
I dunno if the kinda setup you guys and girls have needs to
Not an good idea for me I have a reasonably high end Windows Vista
install on another partition I use the raid for. This is something that
need fixing pre-release, most ASUS high end gamer boards have this kind
Raid and I believe most of the Biostar and ECM boards.
What I really need to see is
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 17:20 + schrieb Jim Bailey:
What I really need to see is someone from the grub2 team to triage this
bug but with 137 and counting open bugs against grub2 and 2 weeks to
release I am quite worried.
I know the problem since a few months and even sent a first
Still fails on Oct 13th cd image.
Happy to test further if a patch gets committed. From RedBass' comment
#8 above it sounds like the only workaround so far is to install 9.04
and then perform an upgrade.
*sigh* this bug is a huge bummer since it permanently prevents anyone
from installing
I have exactly the same issue Intel Raid on an Asus MB uninstallable.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Oh, and I am running the ICH9 intel raid. Please don't get off topic
about the pitfalls of this type of fake raid, I like it and use it a
lot.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Confirmed here. I have the same problem for x86_64 karmic. I have a
separate raid1 that isn't even in / and it just hangs when grub starts
to load. Someone needs to mark this as high importance, because it is a
show stopper.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
I'd like to bump this, it'll stop folks with RAID configurations from
being able to use Karmic.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Syslog attached. Relevant lines at bottom of file: looks like it
couldn't find/install grub.
-
ubuntu grub-installer: info: architecture: i386/generic
Sep 29 14:25:27 ubuntu grub-installer: info: Identified partition label for
/dev/mapper/isw_bfdafeice_ARRAY5: loop
Sep 29 14:25:28 ubuntu
(Edited initial post for clarity).
Note also that I only tried steps 4 and 5 above because I thought maybe
the ext4 had something to do with it. I'll try the same install using
ext3 and see if it makes a difference -- the filesystem type is likely a
red herring but I want to be sure.
**
Could you attach the installer syslog (should be in /var/log/syslog
after the failed installation but before reboot)? Right now, it's
supposed to use GRUB Legacy in the dmraid case, but clearly isn't for
you; I'd like to know why not.
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
** Package changed: ubuntu = grub2 (Ubuntu)
--
Installer fails: grub fails on Intel ICH10 raid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436340
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
31 matches
Mail list logo
