[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-15 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
** Description changed: - It seems some font packages has been removed in Karmic vs Jaunty and so Persian support in Karmic became really poor vs Jaunty. In Jaunty internet browsers like FF use Nazli az serif for persian sites (which is right facing) but in Karmic browsers use DejaVu Serif

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-15 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
** Project changed: ubuntu-translations = firefox ** Changed in: firefox Assignee: Ubuntu Persian Translation Reviewers (ubuntu-l10n-fa) = (unassigned) ** Summary changed: - poor persian support in Karmic + FreeSerif should not be default Serif font -- FreeSerif should not be default

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-09 Thread BehdadEsfahbod
Time to report to Firefox maybe. -- poor persian support in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
I spent some time on the issue today, yes Adi you're right I was testing with a Jaunty DVD which has different packages than the CD version! pmap grep ttf for firefox in Jaunty CD is: b2285000 316 - - - r DejaVuSansMono.ttf b2419000 300 - - -

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
ttf-freefont has dependency with some other packages... so I just deleted /usr/share/fonts/truetype/freefont/ folder and fonts look good now... -- poor persian support in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread Adi Roiban
ttt-freefont is part of ubuntu-desktop metapackage. Have you encountered similar problems with other applications from Ubuntu ? Have you tried accessing that page with other browsers like epiphany or chromium ? We should find out if this is a Firefox or a generic problem. Maybe you can contact

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
epiphany looks like firefox so it has the same issue but chromium looked fine. seems to be a Gecko bug... -- poor persian support in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread BehdadEsfahbod
What about gedit? What about: $ fc-match sans:lang=fa $ fc-match serif:lang=fa -- poor persian support in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
Hi Behdad, This should not be a gnome bug! gedit looks fine and: If ttf-farsiweb is not installed: $ fc-match sans:lang=fa DejaVuSans.ttf: DejaVu Sans Book $ fc-match serif:lang=fa DejaVuSans.ttf: DejaVu Sans Book If ttf-farsiweb is installed: $ fc-match sans:lang=fa DejaVuSans.ttf: DejaVu

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread BehdadEsfahbod
You don't have FreeSans in your firefox font configuration by any chance, do you? I have no idea what change may be causing this. Was freesans also installed on the system that is acting properly? -- poor persian support in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468898 You received this bug

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-08 Thread Mehdi Hassanpour
pmap results I sent earlier are from 9.04 live CD and 9.10 live CD under VM so all configurations are default and there is no FreeSans/FreeSerif in firefox font configuration as I can see. ttf-freefont is installed on both 9.04 and 9.10 by default! but Ubuntu 9.04 FF does not use FreeSerif. --

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-07 Thread Adi Roiban
From what I see in both Jaunty and Karmic the language-support-fonts-fa depends on ttf-farsiweb and ttf-sil-scheherazade Also it looks like Nazli font is shiped with ttf-farsiweb Basicaly, from the point of view of Persian language support there were no changes between Jaunty and Karmic. Maybe

[Bug 468898] Re: poor persian support in Karmic

2009-11-03 Thread David Planella
** Also affects: ubuntu-translations Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid -- poor persian support in Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/468898 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is