[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2014-01-28 Thread Rafael
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 Title: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not To

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2014-01-28 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
It's unclear to me how the ubuntu-docs task can be invalid, so re- opening it. Please don't invalidate a bug without explanation. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = Low ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2014-01-28 Thread Doug Smythies
If we want to keep this one open, then the title should be changed from: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not to: help.ubuntu.com claims to be HTML 5 but is not (but extremely close) I'll fix the help.ubuntu.com glue files in a few days, during the 13.04 EOL deletion

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2014-01-28 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Right, Doug, I agree on all you said. My objection was of the formal kind, i.e. the bug is not and has never been invalid. Updated the title. ** Summary changed: - help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not + help.ubuntu.com claims to be HTML 5 but is not (but extremely

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2013-07-20 Thread John Kim
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 Title: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not To

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2012-08-10 Thread Connor Imes
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: Connor Imes (rocket2dmn) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 Title: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2011-05-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-docs/natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 Title: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2011-05-20 Thread Connor Imes
I pushed a fix for most of this into the Natty branch, but there is one error remaining. If anybody knows how to fix this, I'd be delighted to get a solution: Line 39, Column 88: document type does not allow element form here …ite('form action=https://help.ubuntu.com/search.html;

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2011-05-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-docs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 Title: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2011-05-10 Thread Connor Imes
I've done some work in the Oneiric branch which now uses Mallard as our source and builds into HTML5. There are a few warnings left caused by the yelp-xsl tool used during the build, but I won't try to work around those as the pages validate without errors as they are. I'll also work on the

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2011-05-08 Thread Connor Imes
After looking more into this, it seems that we may be handling some of our custom XSLs incorrectly, particularly w.r.t default namespaces. I'll see if I can clean these up. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2009-11-08 Thread Prateek Karandikar
Huh, how is youtube.com relevant to this? That's like saying if Windows can have broken feature X, then so can we. There are two issues here: 1. The page contradicts itself, by claiming to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional and not being XHTML 1.0 Transitional. An easy way to fix this is of course is to

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2009-11-08 Thread Matthew East
Thanks for the bug. Given that help.ubuntu.com is generated from docbook xml using fairly standard stylesheets, most of these errors are likely to be caused by those stylesheets. We may have a look into this to see if we can improve things but it's not going to be high priority. ** Changed in:

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2009-11-07 Thread shane fagan
Marking as invalid for ubuntu docs. I marked it as a bug against the ubuntu website. ** Also affects: ubuntu-website Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu-website Status: New = Invalid **

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2009-11-07 Thread shane fagan
Crap my bad help.ubuntu.com is under the ubuntu-docs umbrella. -- help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2009-11-07 Thread shane fagan
Where does it say that its xhtml transitional and why does it matter? -- help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/478097 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 478097] Re: help.ubuntu.com claims to be XHTML 1.0 Transitional but is not

2009-11-07 Thread shane fagan
Ok I checked and I know what you are complaining about. Its invalid xhtml transitional. This isnt a problem have a look at http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com The w3 validator looks at web markup very strictly so this isnt a bug that needs fixing. ** Changed in: