[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2015-06-15 Thread Gergely Polonkai
This bug still exists in 12.04.5 LTS, which is supported until April 2017. My package version is 4.20-1.1ubuntu1 and no update to mentioned 4.20-1.1ubuntu6 is available from Canonical’s sources. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2015-03-16 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: Ubuntu Precise Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notificat

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-08-23 Thread Lewis Mello
** Package changed: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-06-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 T

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-03-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 4.20-1.1ubuntu7 --- memtest86+ (4.20-1.1ubuntu7) trusty; urgency=low * Revert to using linux16 memtest image when using serial console. As knetbsd + elf + serial console does not work. (LP: #560839) -- Dave ChilukThu, 06 Mar 20

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-03-06 Thread Adam Conrad
** Also affects: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notifica

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-03-05 Thread Dave Chiluk
Here's a patch that only reverts the serial console changes. ** Attachment added: "lp560839.trusty.revertdebdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/4009279/+files/lp560839.trusty.revertdebdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-03-05 Thread Dave Chiluk
I just confirmed with trust. Loading memtest with > knetbsd /boot/memtest86+.elf console=ttyS0,115200n8 Ignores the serial console option. Loading memtest with > linux16 /boot/memtest86+.bin console=ttyS0,115200n8 Works, but the above issue would still exist on some machines. Loading memt

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-03-05 Thread Dave Chiluk
So I got a report that this change has regressed console memtest86+. I have verified that precise package in my ppa does indeed cause the regression on the serial console menuentry. I'm installing trusty on my testbed that has a serial port now, to verify there. Also as an aside, I tested runnin

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-01-06 Thread Dave Chiluk
It is and it will. It's just getting time to bake in 14.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications ab

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2014-01-06 Thread vsespb
> This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 4.20-1.1ubuntu6 > In Progress → Fix Released Why it's not fixed in Ubuntu 12.04 ? Is 12.04 not supported anymore? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-12-04 Thread Graham Inggs
This should fix LP: #19885 as well. Unfortunately I don't think I have still have any machines that exhibit that problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too smal

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-12-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package memtest86+ - 4.20-1.1ubuntu6 --- memtest86+ (4.20-1.1ubuntu6) trusty; urgency=low [ Rajeev V. Pillai ] * Use ELF memtest86+ binary and load into high memory. This solves the error "error: too small lower memory" with certain bioses. (LP: #5608

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-12-03 Thread Dave Chiluk
no comment ** Patch removed: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/3922491/+files/lp560839.trusty.debdiff ** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attach

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-12-03 Thread Dave Chiluk
Fixed debdiff so that grub menu entries are not modified to specify elf. ** Patch removed: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/3922489/+files/lp560839.trusty.debdiff ** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.l

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-12-03 Thread Dave Chiluk
fixed per feedback from infinity ** Patch removed: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/3922423/+files/lp560839.trusty.debdiff ** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-12-03 Thread Dave Chiluk
I'm uploading a trusty debdiff. At this point no one that has tried the PPA has found an issue with it. So I think the next steps should be to upload the fix to trusty, let it bake for a while, and then sru the solution back from there. ** Patch added: "lp560839.trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-11-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Dave, since you say you're still waiting for feedback before pushing, I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Please resubscribe them when this is ready for upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-11-14 Thread Loïc Minier
I tested this on a problematic machine (triggering the relocation error) with an Award BIOS from a Gigabyte P55A-UD3 motherboard with 4x2048MiB of RAM and the memory was correctly detected and the memtest run started; thanks for working on this! I was using the multiboot version previously, which

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-11-12 Thread paul rosenberg
works for me on Ubuntu 13.04 Intel® Core™ i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz × 4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notificati

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-11-09 Thread Teunis Peters
Works for me, Gigabyte / Intel core i5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications about this bug go to: ht

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-11-02 Thread Ben Blankley
I just tested the PPA posted by Dave Chiluk for memtest86+ on Saucy, and I was able to run the full test without the "too small lower memory" error. My computer is a Toshiba A205 laptop, Intel GM965/GL960 chipset. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-29 Thread LeForgeron
Tested in saucy, as reported at #44, ppa works fine. (Asrock bios, if it matters) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To ma

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-29 Thread Dave Chiluk
@Kristian et al As this is a pretty drastic change with potential of breaking MANY people, I'm waiting for quite a few people letting me know the PPA in #39 has fixed the issue before I push on getting this into the mainstream codebase. Also when testing please let me know which series you tes

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-29 Thread Kristian Erik Hermansen
I'm having same issue. When will this be integrated upstream? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications a

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-24 Thread Tony Locke
I too tested the patch for saucy and I can confirm that it fixed the problem. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) T

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-24 Thread LeForgeron
I tested the proposed ppa: it works and solves the issue of running memtest86+ from the local hard disk at boot time. Good job. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: to

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "lp560839.precise.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, a

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage noti

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Chiluk (chiluk) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: "lp560839.raring.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/357/+files/lp560839.raring.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: "lp560839.saucy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/368/+files/lp560839.saucy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
** Patch added: "lp560839.quantal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/356/+files/lp560839.quantal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-10-23 Thread Dave Chiluk
I just created a ppa for memtest that changes the default memtest to the elf binary , and loads it at 0x10. Can the people on this thread please test the ppa available at the below link and report back. https://launchpad.net/~chiluk/+archive/lp560839 As I do not have any machines that fai

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-07-01 Thread Enrico Z.
Forgot to say that I'm using Memtest 4.20.1.1ubuntu1 (latest verion available from the repos AFAIK) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-07-01 Thread Enrico Z.
The bug affects me too, I'm using Precise 12.04.2 on an HP Pavilion Elite hpe-130it computer (motherboard MS-7613, BIOS version 5.15, Intel i5-650 CPU ). However, Memtest works fine if I use the bootable ISO available on memtest.org, using both the latest version and the one that comes with the U

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-05-04 Thread dino99
** Tags added: lucid ** Tags added: quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-04-27 Thread Geoffrey Morrison
I Just downloaded newest version of memtest86+ available (4.20--uploaded at 01/25/2011) from memtest.org. I then extracted the ISO from a .gz archive with Archive Manager, and burned the ISO to DVD as an image with xfburn. (I couldn't find a handy CD--extracted ISO after download is a mere 1MB+.) T

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-04-27 Thread Geoffrey Morrison
No change. Even took out CMOS battery. Still can't test mem. I got a new "Triple-core" CPU yesterday; I want to put that in, also. I've heard that a newer version of memtest86+ is available. Shall try downloading ISO and burning...shall investigate that first. -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-04-26 Thread Geoffrey Morrison
Xubuntu 12.10 similar error. Popped up recently--I've been having problems with memory and paging, so I ran memtest86+ from menu. My optical drives weren't detected--system kept polling them till they weren't. Rabbit TV required much memory--deep paging using WinXP. Had recently ordered two bigger

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-03-11 Thread A1an
Same issue on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS 4x2GB 1333MHz RAM Intel board DP55WB too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2013-02-20 Thread Mike Harris
I've reproduced this with an HP Z620, with 64G of RAM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications about th

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2012-10-15 Thread Ben
Affects me: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Memory: 12 GiB Processor: Intel Core i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz x 8 Graphics: GeForce GTS 450/PCIe/SSE2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2012-10-10 Thread Stéphane Fillod
Also happens in 12.10 with BIOS FC 06/05/2012 on mainboard Gigabyte M68MT-S2, 4GB of memory, Athlon(tm) II X2 260. Installed: grub 2.00-7ubuntu5, and memtest86+ 4.20-1.1ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2012-09-02 Thread Christian Diefenbach
Still happens in 12.10 with BIOS F7c on mainboard Gigabyte GA-MA-790GP- UD-4H -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2012-07-05 Thread Reason
Still happens in 12.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2012-04-27 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-11-01 Thread PetaZeta
My PC stops working suddenly. Temperature doesn't seem to be an issue, and trying memtest returns the same error with too small a lower memory. Could it have to do with those sudden stops? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-06-15 Thread Loïc Minier
A simpler workaround which worked for me but might not work in all cases or might not be available is to use the "multiboot" entry in the boot menu; in maverick, you would have to re-enable it in /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+ and run update-grub. The reported reason why this entry is commented out in

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-06-13 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
See upstream at http://forum.canardpc.com/threads/51181-error-too-small- lower-memory -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) T

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-06-13 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Same here on Intel Atom board. Ubuntu 10.10. Problem persists even if I drop the Memtest 4.20 binary in to the Ubuntu /boot partition. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: e

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-03-31 Thread Robert Jacobs
Workaround is to boot using ultimate boot cd from CD or usb stick and choose memtest. I believe this has to do with the version of grub because this software will work with older versions of grub. I don' know how grub and memtest interact. http://ultimatebootcd.com/ -- You received this bug not

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-03-31 Thread Nifty
"Too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000)" Same problem on Ubuntu 10.10 x86 M/B : Intel D525MW (Intel Atom) Memory: 2 x 2Gb DDR3-1066 SODIMM HDD : Seagate 7200.4 500Gb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2011-01-11 Thread Bryan
I got "error too small lower memory (99100 > 96400) I'm on Ubuntu 10.10 64bit Raid1 CPU: Intel® Core i5 750 Motherboard: Asus P7P55D (P55 Chipset, Socke 1156, 4x DDR3) Memory: 4GB DDR3 1333mhz (2x 2GB) Hard Drives: 50

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-12-14 Thread Hugh Saunders
I couldn't boot into memtest from my lucid install. I then tried lucid and hardy CDs, but neither worked. I then downloaded a memtest iso[1] from memtest.org, and that worked. [1] http://www.memtest.org/download/4.10/memtest86+-4.10.bin.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-12-06 Thread malheum
I am affected by this error in memtest86+, too. I get exactly the same error message: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) This is a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick, AMD64, all software patches installed. Motherboard is a Gigabyte MA-770T-UD3 CPU is a AMD Athlon II X2 250 4

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-12-05 Thread XabiX
This was an issue with Lucid and now with Maverick. I agree it would be good to have it solved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-12-05 Thread Groening
*bump* any news on this one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 Title: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-11-14 Thread Naty Bidart
I'm having the same issue as hallenrm: "too small lower memory (0X99100 > 0X8f000)" I'm running maverick on a 8GB machine. -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-11-07 Thread Guy Beslagic
The same here, error: To small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) on Lucid 10.04 up to date with 4Gb of ram on GA-MA 770-UD3. -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-11-05 Thread hallenrm
I also have exactly the same problem. I have a PC with Atom 1.6 Ghz processor and 1 MB RAM. I have intalled Maverick (Ubuntu 10.10) only yesterday. On Memtest at boot, i get the message "too small lower memory (0X99100 > 0X8f000) -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.l

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-10-22 Thread Roopa Srinivas J
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707339/+files/Xorg.0.log.old.txt -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-10-22 Thread Roopa Srinivas J
** Attachment added: "version.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707338/+files/version.log -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-10-22 Thread Roopa Srinivas J
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707337/+files/lspci-vvnn.log -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-10-22 Thread Roopa Srinivas J
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/560839/+attachment/1707316/+files/dmesg.log -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-10-21 Thread Roopa Srinivas J
I do have the similar error says: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x8f000) Press any key to continue... ## My system Specs: -Computer- Processor : 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz Memory : 1020MB (679MB used) Operating System: Ubun

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-09-09 Thread Steve Atwell
I'm seeing a similar error message: "error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x96800)." Dell T3500 workstation with 12GB of RAM Ubuntu Lucid AMD64 memtest86+ 4.00-2ubuntu3 -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notifica

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-06-21 Thread XabiX
Same problem "error too small lower memory (99100 > 94c00)" with: Lucid 64 2.6.33R5 Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3 firmware F6 2*1Go RAM xa...@htpc:/media$ apt-cache policy memtest86+ memtest86+: Install: 4.00-2ubuntu3 Candidat: 4.00-2ubuntu3 Table de version: *** 4.00-2ubuntu3 0 500 http://

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-06-20 Thread krishaqua
See this issue with Linux Mint 9 Intel Motherboard: D945GCNL 2x1GB DD2 RAM -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-06-16 Thread Radu Cotescu
This manifests on Lucid 64, running on a system with Intel Core i7-930 on an ASRock X58 Extreme motherboard with the latest BIOS version, 6 GB of RAM. ** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-06-10 Thread Anton Kraus
Same problem on a Gigabyte GA-770TA-UD3 (AMD 770chipset), Phenom II X4. Running 64bit Lucid. -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-05-16 Thread Fred Fox
I have this same problem on a Dell Studio XPS with Core I7 running Karmic 64 bit. -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-05-01 Thread LAZA
Also the fresh installed Lucid... -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-04-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Debian) Status: Unknown => Confirmed -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/560839 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-04-12 Thread Colin Watson
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #549429 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549429 ** Also affects: memtest86+ (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549429 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 >

[Bug 560839] Re: error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400)

2010-04-11 Thread LAZA
Seems to be a general problem! My now fresh installed Karmic got the same problem... Linux lucid 2.6.31-20-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 04:38:19 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux grub-common 1.97~beta4-1ubuntu4.1 memtest86+ 2.11-3ubuntu5 -- error: too small lower memory (0x99100 > 0x98400) https:/