Launchpad has imported 8 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548783.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.
On 2009-12-18T15:40:50+00:00 Jakub wrote:
gcc (including 4.5) doesn't build against xulrunner-devel-1.9.2:
In file included from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsAString.h:43,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsSubstring.h:40,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsString.h:44,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsIPluginInstance.h:26,
from
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:65:
/usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsStringFwd.h:49:2: error: #error Internal
string headers are not available from external-linkage code.
In file included from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsAString.h:64,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsSubstring.h:40,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsString.h:44,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsIPluginInstance.h:26,
from
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:65:
/usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsTSubstring.h:40:2: error: #error Cannot use
internal string classes without MOZILLA_INTERNAL_API defined. Use the frozen
header nsStringAPI.h instead.
In file included from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsAString.h:69,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsSubstring.h:40,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsString.h:44,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsIPluginInstance.h:26,
from
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:65:
/usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsTSubstring.h:40:2: error: #error Cannot use
internal string classes without MOZILLA_INTERNAL_API defined. Use the frozen
header nsStringAPI.h instead.
In file included from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsReadableUtils.h:51,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsString.h:52,
from /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsIPluginInstance.h:26,
from
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:65:
/usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9.2/nsTArray.h:46:15: error: new: No such file or
directory
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:66:35: error:
nsIPluginInstancePeer.h: No such file or directory
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:67:31: error:
nsIPluginTagInfo2.h: No such file or directory
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:149: error:
'NS_IPLUGINTAGINFO2_IID' was not declared in this scope
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:207: error:
ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'nsIPluginTagInfo2' with no type
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:207: error:
expected ';' before '*' token
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc: In function
'gchar* plugin_get_documentbase(NPP_t*)':
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:877: error:
'nsIPluginInstancePeer' was not declared in this scope
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:877: error:
'peer' was not declared in this scope
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:879: error:
'nsIPluginTagInfo2' was not declared in this scope
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:879: error:
'pluginTagInfo2' was not declared in this scope
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:891: error:
'class nsIPluginInstance' has no member named 'GetPeer'
../../../../../../libjava/classpath/native/plugin/gcjwebplugin.cc:898: error:
'union info_union' has no member named 'info_field'
Google found
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6?cmd=changeset;node=8353f4e67ec1
changes to IcedTea plugin, perhaps those might be usable to some extent.
This is a blocker for gcc in f13..
Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/classpath/+bug/561892/comments/0
On 2009-12-18T17:18:13+00:00 Andrew wrote:
I believe the plan is to remove gcjwebplugin entirely.
As far as I am aware it's simply a matter of removing
--enable-plugin
from the specfile
Deepak, please confirm.
Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/classpath/+bug/561892/comments/1
On 2009-12-22T03:03:02+00:00 Deepak wrote:
Created attachment 379759
Patch to remove gcjwebplugin from the gcc rpm
(In reply to