[Bug 588033] Re: oprofile needs rebuilding against binutils 2.20.51.20100710

2010-09-08 Thread KyL416
It needs to be rebuilt yet again for binutils 2.20.51.20100908-0ubuntu1 Maybe in the future the developers can link oprofile to binutils since it seems it needs to rebuilt any time binutils is upated -- oprofile needs rebuilding against binutils 2.20.51.20100710

[Bug 588033] Re: oprofile needs rebuilding against binutils 2.20.51.20100710

2010-09-08 Thread Anders Kaseorg
KyL416: No, Debian packages cannot be dynamically linked with binutils: Package: binutils-dev Description: The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) This package includes header files and static libraries necessary to build programs which use the GNU BFD library,

[Bug 588033] Re: oprofile needs rebuilding against binutils 2.20.51.20100710

2010-09-08 Thread Anders Kaseorg
This makes oprofile link statically against libbfd, again, by merging in the Debian NMU that did the same thing: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537744 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573905 This will make future rebuilds against new binutils unnecessary for

[Bug 588033] Re: oprofile needs rebuilding against binutils 2.20.51.20100710

2010-08-09 Thread dn
libopagent1: Depends: binutils ( 2.20.51.20100618) but 2.20.51.20100710-1ubuntu2 is installed. oprofile: Depends: binutils ( 2.20.51.20100618) but 2.20.51.20100710-1ubuntu2 is installed. Same bug, newer version--oprofile needs to get rebuilt again. ** Summary changed: - oprofile needs