[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2008-10-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Unfortunately this bug report is being closed because we received no
response to the last inquiry for information. However, the Intrepid Ibex
8.10 Beta release was most recently announced -
http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/intrepid/beta . If you are able to confirm
this is still an issue with this most recent release please feel free to
reopen this report. To reopen the bug report you can click on the
current status, under the Status column, and change the Status back to
New.

Thanks,

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2008-08-28 Thread Leann Ogasawara
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the
upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release.  As a result, the kernel team would
appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.
There are one of two ways you should be able to test:

1)  If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux-
image-2.6.27-* package is currently available for you to install and
test.

--or--

2)  The upcoming Alpha5 for Intrepid Ibex 8.10 will contain this newer
2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel.  Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4.
Please watch http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for Alpha5 to be announced.
You should then be able to test via a LiveCD.

Please let us know immediately if this newer 2.6.27 kernel resolves the
bug reported here or if the issue remains.  More importantly, please
open a new bug report for each new bug/regression introduced by the
2.6.27 kernel and tag the bug report with 'linux-2.6.27'.  Also, please
specifically note if the issue does or does not appear in the 2.6.26
kernel.  Thanks again, we really appreicate your help and feedback.

** Tags added: cft-2.6.27

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2008-07-14 Thread Sergio Zanchetta
The 18 month support period for Edgy Eft 6.10 has reached it's end of
life.  As a result, we are closing the linux-source-2.6.17 Edgy Eft
kernel task.

Hardy Heron 8.04 was recently released.  It would be helpful if you
could test the new release and verify if this is still an issue -
http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download .  You should be able to test
your bug using the LiveCD.  Please let us know your results.  Thanks.


** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

** Tags added: edgy-close

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2007-12-11 Thread Brian Murray
I am assigning this bug to the 'ubuntu-kernel-team' per their bug
policy.  For future reference you can learn more about their bug policy
at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeamBugPolicies .

** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team)

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2007-04-03 Thread Matevz Jekovec
I'm experiencing the same bug with Feisty! I was weekly dist-upgrading
my system from edgy to feisty and the kernel 2.6.17-11-generic didn't
work anymore (the latest 2.6.20 kernels don't either!). However,
2.6.17-10-generic works fine.

I'm using Athlon XP 2600 and ReiserFS. Tried both, Lilo and Grub and the
symptoms are the same. Partition settings are ok as far as I can tell
(root partition set correctly, initrd found). Maybe this is reiserfs
problem because edgy works fine on ext3 on 2.6.17-11-generic on the
other partition.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2007-04-03 Thread Matevz Jekovec
Sorry, looks like it magically works out of the box. Kernel
2.6.20-13-generic. No tty control turned off problems anymore.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2007-02-28 Thread Michael Voigt
 Did you do the new feature on apt-get that removes unnecessary packages? If 
 so, it seems it might have removed upstart.. this was another bug recently 
 posted.
Make sure you have upstart package on your system to init the new kernels. You 
can use a livecd and chroot your filesystem if you are not able to currently do 
anything. 

I can confirm this. I had the same error and my menu.lst was set up
fine. It was caused by an apt-get autoremove. Mounting a Ubuntu-livcd,
doing chroot, and doing an apt-get install ubuntu-minimal solved the
problem (apt-get install upstart was not enough!)

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2007-01-04 Thread Monika Krug
 Can you elaborate on this issue please, how to fix it and reinstall
that package?

I think he meant like that:
Boot from a live CD.
Open a terminal.
If you don't know, use sudo fdisk -l to check out what partitions you have and 
on which one your system is installed.
Create a directory, e.g. sudo mkdir /media/hda1 (name doesn't matter).
Mount the partition with your system into the directory with sudo mount 
/dev/hda1 /media/hda1 (or the appropriate partition for your system)
Chroot there with chroot /media/hda1
Reinstall upstart or whatever your system is missing to boot (kernel? 
ubuntu-minimal?) with sudo apt-get install upstart

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2007-01-03 Thread Niklas Fleischer
The same happens to me on a 2.6.20-2 and -3 generic.

Has anyone any idea how to fix this problem?

(iam getting the same output like above,
amd64 3000+ on 32 bit, feisty, 1024mb ram)

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-12-17 Thread trv

Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead from B. 
Grantham at 2006-09-12 16:42:56 UTC

Did you do the new feature on apt-get that removes unnecessary packages? If 
so, it seems it might have removed upstart.. this was another bug recently 
posted.

Make sure you have upstart package on your system to init the new kernels. You 
can use a livecd and chroot your filesystem if you are not able to currently 
do anything.

I have the same problem, and i remember runnning apt-get autoremove and
i think it removed upstart among others. Can you elaborate on this issue
please, how to fix it and reinstall that package? And where is this bug
report you refer to.

Thank you

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-12-09 Thread Chris Dunning
I experienced this same problem after an apt-get dist-upgrade to move
from Dapper to Edgy on my laptop.  Examining the boot messages showed
that the wrong partitions were being mounted (or at least attempted).  I
was able to boot to a liveCD and edit the menu.lst to solve the problem,
menu.lst had the wrong UUID listed.  After resolving that issue I am
able to boot to my laptop without problem.

My laptop's partitioning scheme is a bit complicated for reasons I won't
go into, so that may have confused the upgrade engine.  I have /dev/hda6
as my /home/ partition and /dev/hda7 as the / partition.  I would guess
that perhaps the upgrade program looked for the first available Linux
partition and assumed that was the right one to boot.  In this case that
was not the right answer.  If that's not the case I have no idea why it
decided to boot to hda6 rather than 7.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-15 Thread Nirmisgav
Hi, I fixed the problem with dpkg, and did full dist-upgrade today.
But the boot has not changed. I get error messages, sometimes the 2 errors 
about DMA, and I get a read-only filesystem.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-12 Thread mlind
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Sourcepackagename: None = linux-source-2.6.17
   Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-12 Thread B. Grantham
Did you do the new feature on apt-get that removes unnecessary packages?
If so, it seems it might have removed upstart.. this was another bug
recently posted.

Make sure you have upstart package on your system to init the new
kernels. You can use a livecd and chroot your filesystem if you are not
able to currently do anything.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-12 Thread fubadubrub
I opened Synaptic and entered as a search term upstart and got back 3
responses.

upstart 0.2.5-1
upstart-compat-sysv 0.2.5-1
These 2 are installed.


However I also saw that this package was not installed.
upstart-logd 0.2.5-1

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-12 Thread Nirmisgav
I have upstart installed.

in kernel 2.6.17-7 I get also these 2 errors lines :
[17179620.024000] hda: timeout waiting for DMA
[17179620.024000] hda: drive not read for command

and then (also in 2.6.17-6) :
/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
#


When I chrooted to the file-system from dapper-livecd, the fs became read-only 
every-time I tried to do dpkg --configure -a or apt-get -f install.
something went very wrong with my file-system...

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-11 Thread Warren Butler
I can only get my 2.6.17-7 kernel to boot (same symptoms and 2.6.17-6
boots fine) by changing /dev/sda1 to /dev/hda1 in the kernel parameters.

I have 3 (older) machines that exhibit the same behaviour.  A fourth
(more recent) machine boots fine, but it has a SATA disk.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-11 Thread Nirmisgav
I have also the error : /bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
no more verbose than that.

The difference is that I get this error also in 2.6.17-7-generic and
also in 2.6.17-6-686 which was previously booting Ok.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-10 Thread mlind
Does booting to 2.6.17-6-686 kernel work fine?

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-10 Thread fubadubrub
Yes I can boot kernel 2.6.17-6-686 just fine without problems.  The only
problematic kernel is with 2.6.17-7-generic.

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 59792] Re: Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead

2006-09-10 Thread fubadubrub
I tested single user mode and it still fails with kernel
2.6.17-7-generic (single-user mode)

However it also gave me some additional information, see below.

Begin: Running /scripts/local-bottom...
Done.
Done.
Begin: Running /scripts/init-bottom...
mount: Mounting /root/dev on /dev/.static/dev failed: no such file or directory
Done.
mount: Mounting /sys on /root/sys failed: no such file or directory
mount: Mounting /proc on /root/proc failed: no such file or directory
Target filesystem doesn't have /sbin/init

-- 
Kernel 2.6.17-7-generic fails to boot, I get the BusyBox instead
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59792

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs