[Bug 617278] Re: Openoffice 3.2.1 not installable

2010-08-15 Thread Michal Matyska
openoffice.org (1:3.2.1-5ubuntu2) maverick; urgency=low * Pass the same -v to dh_makeshlibs -- (for dpkg-gensymbols) as to dh_gencontrol -- (for dpkg-gencontrol); some symbols are missing from the symbols files and hence ure symbols have bogus dep on ure = source-version which can't

[Bug 617278] Re: Openoffice 3.2.1 not installable

2010-08-14 Thread Michal Matyska
according to this log the amd64 version was built correctly (version 1:3.2.1-5). But I'm still getting some unsatisfied dependencies LANG=C sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -V Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done

[Bug 617278] Re: Openoffice 3.2.1 not installable

2010-08-14 Thread Michal Matyska
sorry the log in the previous post should be https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/1:3.2.1-5ubuntu1/+build/1916261 Anyway I found it... many of OOo packages depend on ure (=1:3.2.1-5ubuntu1) but ure with version 1.6.1+OOo3.2.1~rc2-2ubuntu1 is in the repository to be installed, which

[Bug 617278] Re: Openoffice 3.2.1 not installable

2010-08-14 Thread eris23
on maverick amd64 The following packages have unmet dependencies: openoffice.org-base : Depends: openoffice.org-base-core (= 1:3.2.1-5ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: ure (= 1:3.2.1-5ubuntu1) but 1.6.1+OOo3.2.1-5ubuntu1 is to be installed --

[Bug 617278] Re: Openoffice 3.2.1 not installable

2010-08-13 Thread Harry
The dependencies are correct. The openoffice.org-style packages you listed all of them provide virtual package openoffice.org-style. But those packages are for the time being available only for the 32-bit architecture. The 64-bit architecture did not build well and failed. Just wait till it gets