[Bug 737233] Re: debian/rules clean: fails (deapply/unpatch)

2011-09-07 Thread Matthias Klose
works for me in oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737233 Title: debian/rules clean: fails (deapply/unpatch) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 737233] Re: debian/rules clean: fails (deapply/unpatch)

2011-09-07 Thread Matthias Klose
works for me in oneiric ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737233 Title: debian/rules clean: fails (deapply/unpatch) To

[Bug 737233] Re: debian/rules clean: fails (deapply/unpatch)

2011-03-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Attachment of fixed dpatch, for convenience. NOTE: probably still need to add the correct $(MAKE) -C ... headers line for debian/rules's build- static-stamp target. ** Attachment added: 151_arm_opt_merge_exidx_entries.dpatch

[Bug 737233] Re: debian/rules clean: fails (deapply/unpatch)

2011-03-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Bah, never mind; for some reason that patch failed to apply (despite the fact that I used dpatch-edit-patch to create it). Instead, I just removed the chunk from the original diff file that was against bfd- in2.h. Do that instead. ** Patch removed: 151_arm_opt_merge_exidx_entries.dpatch