Opening new tasks on this for Lucid and Maverick; they released with the
same old version of pycryptopp as Natty, so this seems like it would
still be applicable for them.
(This is presently relevant for a backport request - bug #834361 - wihch
is currently uninstallable because of Lucid and
Just for the record, attached are the 2 node test runs.
As per https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/AdvancedInstall#point8,
tested by running 'tahoe debug trial'.
** Attachment added: tahoe.tests.tar.gz
Thank you very much for the testing, Alfonso.
By the way, I noticed that this wiki page -- https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac
/tahoe-lafs/wiki/OSPackages -- hasn't been updated to show the existence
of Oneiric.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
'tahoe debug trial' is indeed the correct way to run the tests for the
installed version.
The following failure:
twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: We seem to be testing the code at
'/usr/lib/pymodules',
(according to the source filename
'/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/allmydata/__init__.pyc'),
I don't remember what dir from I tested.
Now from ~/.tahoe:
$ tahoe debug trial
** Attachment added: tahoe-tests.tar.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycryptopp/+bug/811721/+attachment/2583426/+files/tahoe-tests.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
the embedded cryptopp is not used so the extraversion.h must not be shipped.
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/pycryptopp/0.5.29-1
that may be something you could apply upstream for the non-embedded
build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This bug was fixed in the package pycryptopp - 0.5.29-0ubuntu0.1
---
pycryptopp (0.5.29-0ubuntu0.1) natty-proposed; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (LP: #811721)
* refresh patches
- add new patch from debian to not ship extraversion.h
-- Julian Taylor
add new patch from debian to not ship extraversion.h
Is there a URL for this patch from debian? I would like to see what this
change is. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've 2 natty boxes and updated pycryptopp from -proposed using apt.
I've set up a 2 node grid and everything seems to work fine.
Just dumped a handful of files/dirs, deleted some shares, verified/repaired
successfully and ran some 'tahoe backup'.
If someone can point to some thorough test
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage
If someone can point to some thorough test procedure, please do.
The test suite can be run using 'python setup.py trial'. Thanks for the
manual testing; the test suite isn't intended to replace that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
As tahoe is the only reverse dependency of this package, this looks
acceptable to me.
** Changed in: pycryptopp (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/pycryptopp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications about this
** Branch linked: lp:~jtaylor/ubuntu/natty/pycryptopp/sru-811721
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications
With 11.10 coming soon is this bug still in the works for 11.04?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications
thearthur, typically we don't update to new upstream versions unless
they are *purely* bug fix releases. It sounds to me like this might
change the API of pycryptopp, which is unacceptable as a Stable Release
Update (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). If, however, you
can show that it
I did, in fact, misunderstand the original request, on re-reading it I
see that the inclination is that the API has not been changed and
upstream has asserted as much. Reversing my position then, and marknig
this as Invalid in tahoe-lafs, and Confirmed in pycryptopp.
The next step would be for
Bug 843000 was a duplicate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This problem is still not fixed. A newer version of python-pycryptopp
needs to be added to the 11.04 apt repository. After an apt-get update:
# apt-cache show python-pycryptopp
Package: python-pycryptopp
Priority: optional
Section: universe/python
Installed-Size: 1416
Maintainer: Ubuntu
** Changed in: tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications
** Also affects: tahoe-lafs (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To
Installed from 11.04 apt repo:
Package: python-pycryptopp
Priority: optional
Section: universe/python
Installed-Size: 1416
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
Original-Maintainer: Zooko O'Whielacronx zo...@zooko.com
Architecture: amd64
Source: pycryptopp
Version:
** Changed in: pycryptopp (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications
What Zooko said. (I reviewed the changes to pycryptopp and they all look
harmless or low-risk.)
Bear in mind that debian/control in Tahoe-LAFS also needs to be changed
to depend on python-pycryptopp (= 0.5.20) here:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jtaylor/ubuntu/oneiric/tahoe-
I meant http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0386 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1 in natty
To manage notifications about this bug
This would probably be a good policy for Python packages in general.
That's a really good idea.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811721
Title:
update pycryptopp to version 0.5.29-1
I'm the primary maintainer of pycryptopp and a primary maintainer of
tahoe-lafs, and I would be happy with upgrading pycryptopp in Ubuntu and
less happy with patching tahoe-lafs's declarations of its dependencies.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
27 matches
Mail list logo
