[Bug 979320]
*** Bug 47699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
*** Bug 48483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
Related: bug 50704 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
wontfix as per upstream ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
Hello Thorsten, I am a big believer in free software and in standardization of document formats. First, if a commercial project introduces a bug, there is no way to have a discussion with the developers. With free software I can and that is, most of the time, refreshing. Second, we as a company need to keep our documentation available for at least 10 years after delivering the last product. That would mean for us at least for a period of 15 years after creating a document. That's why we choose ODF and PDF. Obviously the choice for ODF raises a lot of eyebrows internally and externally for us too, as skiani also mentions. The funny thing with standards is that it is not the writing of a standard that makes it a standard, but the adoption of it. So while former versions of OO and LO incorrectly implement it in some respects, that implementation has become the 'defacto standard' pure by market share - at least for now. I honestly can't say if this bug will hold up large scale adoption of > 3.5 (17 users subscribing to this bug only). And when everybody transitions, there will be no difficulties in exchanging documents between companies. In that respect exchanging doc's with MS Office users is a bigger issue. Creating a having config switch as you suggest would probably only have the effect of prolonging the transition phase as new doc's with the broken format would be created with each day passing, which is not would I would want either. It would probably have been better to add a fix to the 3.4.6 release, especially as that was as I understand for a similar reason, file compatibility of encrypted documents, but I guess that is now too late. Having a Save As OpenOffice/LibreOffice 3.3/3.4 option would work for me, but I guess building that, getting it tested and distributed would take so much time that it would be too late to help anyone? Otherwise I would ask you 'yes, pretty please, could you do this for us, ordinary but involved free software users'. Thanks for the attention, I will shut up now, see how the world adopts 3.5.x and then follow. Bye. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
First off - please move this discussion to disc...@documentfoundation.org. To your question: (In reply to comment #39) > This IS a nasty bug in the specification that from my point of view needs to > be > fixed. > No it's not. Did you read the spec? It is referring to svg in that particular section. Svg is not going to change, and I would strongly oppose deviating in subtle parts from that standard, to accomodate an implementation bug in _one_ ODF consumer. Please note further that with 3.5.3, we *do* correctly read old documents, and note even further that there's about a million other things that won't show up correctly in OOo 1.0, if you make it load a current ODF1.2-extended document. Get real. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
(In reply to comment #34) > When I receive a document from a customer written in 3.4.4, edit it with 3.5.2 > and return it back, to that customer it will look like *I* broke it. > and > Actually M$ with their ever changing format seem to do a better job in > migrating documents and users to a newer product while maintaining backwards > compatibility with slower adopters. > and (In reply to comment #36) > For me affects 100's of legal documents and dozens of interal and external > users whom we have already had a hard enough time convincing multiple IT > depts to install. Only solution is forklift upgrade, really bad. > While I understand your frustration, there are several inaccuracies here I'd like to correct. First, conflating MS (or, for that matter, any *commercial* offering) with a free software / volunteer project is at best disingenuous. I'm certain any number of companies providing professional support for LibreOffice will happily backport fixes to the very version you're using - just as MS does with service packs for older products. Second, this bug *is* nasty, and it *does* affect all those people who faithfully implement ODF as-specified - so if you promote ODF, you cannot possibly ask us *not* to comply with it, can't you? And third, if you'd ask nicely, I could maybe stick a hidden config option into one of the upcoming 3.5.x versions, that would permit switching that back (no UI for that, though). That would be a separate enhancement request though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
Wait a minute this IS NOT a bug in pre 3.5 LO or OOo. I have files that go back a decade that have very complex geometries like these and there is no problem, NONE. I can open them in 1x, 2x and pre 3.5 the 3x series no problem. That includes OOo, LO and IBM Symphony. There was never a problem hundreds of documents. This IS a nasty bug in the specification that from my point of view needs to be fixed. Slavishly following the spec document. to break more than a decade of functionality is poor product management. The end user does not care that the specification is flawless beautiful only that the product work forward and back. The ODF file specification should be amended ASAP to match what every implementation has done to maintain continuity. Breaking that continuity is was loses user trust and confident, not mindlessly following the spec the end user be damned! The spec and the design do need to follow each other but that does not mean you never bend the spec to match the reality on the ground. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
** Changed in: df-libreoffice Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
For some reason Korrawit set this to VERIFIED FIXED. Apparently that signals that we are not allowed to add comments on this situation any more. I think actually VERIFIED WONTFIX is more appropriate but don't dare to change it and risk pissing somebody off. oo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
Hi, so is new bug report the right way to handle this? I have to agree 100% with Ferry breaking backward compatibilty is a huge disaster. For me affects 100's of legal documents and dozens of interal and external users whom we have already had a hard enough time convincing multiple IT depts to install. Only solution is forklift upgrade, really bad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
Ferry Toth, this bug is VERIFIED FIXED. Unless a code error exists in the patch, no more comments to this bug report are required. Regarding release notes, you are welcome to submit a new report advising of release migration issues. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
@Christopher We are not living in a very small world. When I receive a document from a customer written in 3.4.4, edit it with 3.5.2 and return it back, to that customer it will look like *I* broke it. Do you expect me to tell the customer they have an infrastructure problem? What you call an EoL version, another person will call 'stable'. Actually the problem here is a not very well thought through migration path from 3.4.4 to 3.5. The promise of the Open Document Format was that this would never be a problem again, since the format is standardized and would not be allowed to change in a direction that causes backwards compatibility problems. However now the standard has not changed, but the interpretation. Actually M$ with their ever changing format seem to do a better job in migrating documents and users to a newer product while maintaining backwards compatibility with slower adopters. Would it not be at least the minimum to warn system administrators of large companies that they may run into this problem before rolling out a new version? The release notes might be the appropriate place. Ferry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
Revert back to VERIFIED FIXED. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Certain shapes drawn in earlier LO versions (<3.4.4) are greatly distorted in LO 3.5.2 (on windows) and LO 3.5.1.2 (Precise). Vice versa when saved in 3.5.1 correctly the documents are broken in 3.4.4 (Oneric). In our case our company logo embedded in writer documents is one of the problems. For us this means virtually all old documents are messed up when opened with LO 3.5.2 while newly created document are broken when viewed with LO 3.4.4. I don't know if many users are affected by this, but for us it certainly is a stopper to migrate to LO 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 and as a result to Precies. Ferry + --- + ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 + Architecture: amd64 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 + InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) + NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia + Package: libreoffice 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE= + LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-17.30-generic 3.0.22 + Tags: oneiric + Uname: Linux 3.0.0-17-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-13 (201 days ago) + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout fax floppy lp lpadmin mysql mythtv plugdev sambashare scanner syslog users video ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320/+attachment/3125335/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
Launchpad has imported 33 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47406. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. On 2012-03-16T12:02:26+00:00 SK wrote: Created attachment 58549 File created in 3.4.3 with series of examples of the problem. All graphics that have internal circuits (non-circular) are getting severely messed up. Any file generated in pre 3.5 does not render graphics correctly. Even worse if you subsequently save the file in 3.5 file is damaged such that graphic problem will now appear if you open in 3.4. This is totally a show stopper we have band 3.5 from our company until this problem is resolved. I will attach file. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/0 On 2012-03-16T12:04:16+00:00 SK wrote: Created attachment 58550 File created in 3.4.3, opened in 3.5.1 then saved. Note when opening file in all versions of LO graphics are now screwed up after 3.5.1 has saved. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/1 On 2012-03-16T19:34:18+00:00 S-joyemusequna wrote: Confirmed with LibO 3.5.1 on Windows XP. This is a regression. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/2 On 2012-03-20T15:47:36+00:00 Pmladek-y wrote: I add some draw developers into CC. Please, look at it ASAP. It would be great to fix this for 3.5.2-rc2. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/3 On 2012-03-20T16:48:36+00:00 Rb-henschel wrote: It happens too when you copy a combined shape from Draw to Writer. Dev build Build ID: e40af8c-10029e3-615e522-88673a2-727f724 (3.5.0 beta3) has been OK. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/4 On 2012-03-20T17:47:44+00:00 Rb-henschel wrote: Build Build-ID: 7e68ba2-a744ebf-1f241b7-c506db1-7d53735 (3.5.0rc3) is already faulty. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/5 On 2012-03-20T18:00:57+00:00 Lo-bugs wrote: Created attachment 58773 gdb session with backtrace from the warning I am just throwing this onto the pile. If it is a distraction, please let me know. Observations on build from master commit cc32ce4, pulled 2012-03-09, and configured with --disable-mozilla --enable-symbols --enable-dbgutil --enable-crashdump --disable-build-mozilla --without-system-postgresql --enable-python=internal running on ubuntu-natty 32-bit with desktop "gnome (no effects)". I named the sample document on the command line. When LibreOffice displayed the document, I clicked with mouse in the coloured area of the first column of the first row after the headings. The program displayed 15 times the message ... warn:sfx2.appl:13216:1:/home/terry/lo_hacking/git/libo/sfx2/source/appl/module.cxx:396: SfxModule::GetFieldUnit: no metric item in the module implemented by '8SwModule'! I am attaching typescript of gdb session. Backtrace full from the first occurrence of the warning starts around line 94, plain backtrace starts around line 387. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/6 On 2012-03-21T09:31:13+00:00 Sumuthu wrote: More info: Pasting the object from Draw to Writer (or Writer to Draw), mirrors the boxes (vertically and up) (even more) - I guess some issue with either positioning or the box positioning. If you keep doing (the copy-paste b/w draw and writer) the box in the first image keeps moving up. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/7 On 2012-03-21T09:33:34+00:00 Sumuthu wrote: CC'ing writer developers as well. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/8 On 2012-03-23T08:55:14+00:00 Rb-henschel wrote: Some new unfilled array heads are affected too, for example the unfilled triangle and the unfilled diamond. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/9
[Bug 979320] Re: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
Ferry Toth, thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please execute the following command, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal: apport-collect 979320 When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs. ** Description changed: Certain shapes drawn in earlier LO versions (<3.4.4) are greatly distorted in LO 3.5.2 (on windows) and LO 3.5.1.2 (Precise). Vice versa when saved in 3.5.1 correctly the documents are broken in 3.4.4 (Oneric). In our case our company logo embedded in writer documents is one of the problems. For us this means virtually all old documents are messed up when opened with LO 3.5.2 while newly created document are broken when viewed with LO 3.4.4. - This bug has already been reported upstream as #48443 see - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48443 - - For examples see the free desktop bugzilla. - I don't know if many users are affected by this, but for us it certainly is a stopper to migrate to LO 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 and as a result to Precies. Ferry ** Tags added: oneiric ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Summary changed: - [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 + Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #47406 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47406 ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Importance: Medium => Unknown ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Status: Invalid => Unknown ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Remote watch: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #48443 => freedesktop.org Bugzilla #47406 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
** Changed in: df-libreoffice Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
This is a dupe, and should therefore be fixed in 3.5.2. 3.4.4 is broken, and can't retroactively be fixed. I don't know how relevant this is in practice, potentially one could add a hidden config item "export broken svg", or tie it to ODF1.0/1.1 export (though I'd hate that - it is indeed written wrongly). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 47406 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320]
I don't know what you mean by '3.4.4 is broken'? We are creating and editing documents with OO 3.2.1 and LO 3.4.4 intermixed without having this problem. Problems start with 3.5.0 and occur also in 3.5.2. So it is either not fixed in 3.5.2 or has existed from at least from 3.2.1 until 3.4.4. Considering the amount of documents created in that period of time, I don't think it is reasonable to say 'it is fixed in 3.5.2'. Unless you have a workaround to work on 3.5.2 documents with OO 3.2.1 and LO3.4.4? Something more elegant then: export it to MS doc. Ferry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
** Summary changed: - Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 + [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: [Upstream] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979320] Re: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48443. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. On 2012-04-08T20:36:28+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: Created attachment 59654 Exalon Delft logo Our company logo has been for a long time as in the attached drawing (odg). In pre-3.5 if has always shown as in the ExalonDelftLogo 3.4.4.pdf. Starting from 3.5 the original element that have been used to create the logo are displaced as shown in ExalonDelftLogo 3.5.pdf. The same problems happen in 3.5.1. Also, the problems happen in our Writer templates where we have this odg embedded (as an object). Strange - are we the only ones suffering from this? Ferry Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/0 On 2012-04-08T20:37:21+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: Created attachment 59655 Exalon Delft logo as shown in pre 3.5 LibreOffice Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/1 On 2012-04-08T20:38:12+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: Created attachment 59656 Distorted in 3.5 and at least 3.5.1 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/2 On 2012-04-09T19:52:35+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: Ha, just found this bug to be resolved in LO 3.5.2 (verified with the Windows version). Ferry Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/3 On 2012-04-10T10:24:33+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: But not resolved entirely: Opening Exalon Delft logo with 3.5.2 and saving it again, then opening in 3.4.4 shows the same type of distortion. I don't think this bug can be closed yet. Ferry Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/4 On 2012-04-10T17:41:45+00:00 Libreoffice-z wrote: Modify Version due to Comments. Reported problem not reproducible with "LibreOffice 3.5.2.2 German UI/Locale [Build-ID: 281b639-6baa1d3-ef66a77-d866f25-f36d45f] on German WIN7 Home Premium (64bit). But I can confirm effect from Comment 4 @Ferry Toth Your OS? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/5 On 2012-04-10T18:06:21+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: OK, so this is the status: The 'particular shapes' have been created a draw object with OO 3.2.1 and embedded in a writer document. The have now been 'saved as a copy' draw document by LO 3.4.4. Opening this using 3.5.0, 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 shows a broken drawing. Opening with 3.4.4 shows no problems. Saving again (without modifications) by LO 3.4.4 (this is the version I attached above). With 3.4.4 no problem. With 3.5.0, 3.5.1 broken. With 3.5.2 displays OK. Then saving with 3.5.2, opens in 3.5.2 without problem. In 3.4.4 and 3.4.6 broken. Versions used: 3.4.4 Ubuntu Oneric 3.4.6 W7 x64 native 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.5.2 Windows (native W7 x64, virtual box W7 i32 and x64) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/6 On 2012-04-11T08:09:34+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: To help reproduce the original problem I attached the freshly extracted embedded object ExalonLogo_embedded.odg. This one displays well in 3.4.4 but not in 3.5.2. Ferry Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/7 On 2012-04-11T08:13:51+00:00 Ferry Toth wrote: Created attachment 59790 Displays well in 3.4.4, distorted in 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.5.2 Extracted (save copy as ..) from a writer document using 3.4.4, originally created using 3.2.1 (?), but not opened / re-saved in 3.4.4. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df- libreoffice/+bug/979320/comments/8 On 2012-04-11T08:52:03+00:00 Libreoffice-z wrote: Yes, "Displays well in 3.4.4, distorted in 3.5.0, 3.5.1, 3.5.2" perfectly show the problem, what is not fixed in parallel installation of Master "LOdev 3.6.0alpha0+ – WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) ENGLISH UI [Build ID: 4495824-6299bf6-ec8645]" (tinderbox: Win-x86@6-fast pull time 2012-04-08 00:03:52) Alreadx a problem with 3.5.0RC2, still worked fine with3.5.0 Beta0 @Thorsten: Please set Status to ASSIGNED and add your
[Bug 979320] [NEW] Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5
Public bug reported: Certain shapes drawn in earlier LO versions (<3.4.4) are greatly distorted in LO 3.5.2 (on windows) and LO 3.5.1.2 (Precise). Vice versa when saved in 3.5.1 correctly the documents are broken in 3.4.4 (Oneric). In our case our company logo embedded in writer documents is one of the problems. For us this means virtually all old documents are messed up when opened with LO 3.5.2 while newly created document are broken when viewed with LO 3.4.4. This bug has already been reported upstream as #48443 see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48443 For examples see the free desktop bugzilla. I don't know if many users are affected by this, but for us it certainly is a stopper to migrate to LO 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 and as a result to Precies. Ferry ** Affects: df-libreoffice Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #48443 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48443 ** Also affects: df-libreoffice via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48443 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979320 Title: Particular Subtracted shapes not compatible LibO 3.4 - 3.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/979320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
