[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-04 Thread Thomas Hood
The hypothesis was that named started before dnsmasq, preventing dnsmasq from binding port 53 on 127.0.0.1. But the hypothesis is false, since you are not running named after all. Returning to your dig output, it can be summarized as follows. dig s4 -> FAILURE dig @10.1.0.4 s4 -> FAILURE dig @10

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-04 Thread Wolf Rogner
Thomas, there is no local named on any notebook here. dnsmasq does not interfere with named on any of my machines. It should actually not even be possible. As far as I am concerned, the bind() request should return false and give an EADDRINUSE if the socket was already bound by something. Unles

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-03 Thread Thomas Hood
On the affected system when it is manifesting the problem you reported (can't resolve names), is named running locally? (In your original submission you said that bind was running.) What role does this named play in your network? How is it configured? What happens if you stop this named? And th

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-03 Thread Thomas Hood
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notificati

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-03 Thread Wolf Rogner
In fact my point of view is that I have submitted all information I could provide in reasonable time. Give me a bunch of experiments I have to carry out, I'll spend an afternoon to help resolve the issue >From my point of view, I have given you more than enough input to localise the issue (see o

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-02 Thread Thomas Hood
I'd just like to note here before leaving this issue that the submitter originally said that he was running bind. If bind was set up to listen on 127.0.0.1#53 but was not correctly set up to provide name service then I imagine that this could have interfered with the NM-controlled dnsmasq. Explori

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-02 Thread Thomas Hood
> Please understand that I don't have the time OK, marking this as invalid. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-01 Thread Wolf Rogner
My /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained server=10.1.0.4 server=10.1.0.254 server=195.202.128.3 wolf@mbp:~$ ps -elf | grep dnsmasq 4 S nobody 25661 25624 0 80 0 - 7579 poll_s 15:20 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/dnsmasq --no-resolv --keep-in-foreground --no-hosts --bind-interfaces --pid-fi

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-01 Thread Thomas Hood
Wolf: You list problems with dnsmasq. In this report (#998712) let's continue to discuss the name resolution failure that you originally reported. One of the other problems you listed is being discussed in #1003842. For the remaining problems you listed, please submit your information to bug rep

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-31 Thread Wolf Rogner
The /etc/resolv.conf held just a reference to 127.0.0.1 # Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8) # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN nameserver 127.0.0.1 search rsb.intern rsb.at I copied a working version over it: # Dynam

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-31 Thread Thomas Hood
Wolf: In #3 you post some output but I don't know how to interpret it. You start with a "ping s4" which yields "unknown host". You end with "ping s4" which successfully pings. What happened in the meantime to change the results? Did you edit something? -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-31 Thread Thomas Hood
Wolf: Please post the FULL contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file as it is when the reported problem occurs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name

Re: [Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 17/05/12 10:19, Wolf Rogner wrote: > I recreated the situation by restarting the network manager. > > resolv.conf contains link to 127.0.0.1 > /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained my name server already. > > However, even dig does not resolv correctly. Here are the results (my > network is 10.x.

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-17 Thread Wolf Rogner
I recreated the situation by restarting the network manager. resolv.conf contains link to 127.0.0.1 /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained my name server already. However, even dig does not resolv correctly. Here are the results (my network is 10.x.x.x actually) wolf@mbp:~$ ping s4 ping: unknown hos

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-17 Thread James Page
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications

[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-13 Thread Wolf Rogner
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712 Title: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dn