[Bug 117314] Re: latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems

2007-05-30 Thread BatteryKing
I recently ran the update from 6.10 to 7.04 and on first boot I had options between kernel 2.6.20-16-generic and 2.6.20-15-386. Kernel 2.6.20-15-386 works fine. Kernel 2.6.20-16-generic does not boot at all. By default on the splash screen I get a thin sliver on the progress bar and after

[Bug 117314] Re: latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems

2007-05-30 Thread BatteryKing
I figured out a way to get things working. I completely de-installed the -16 kernel and modules and such and re-installed from the command prompt `apt-get install kernel-generic` -- latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314 You received this

[Bug 354620] Re: Recording from microphone stutters when pulseaudio is running

2009-08-02 Thread BatteryKing
I need to multiplex on a USB sound device and this doesn't seem to work with the ALSA / OSS tangle, plus it really helps to control the volume levels of each application. However with Pulsaudio having broken mic support across the board (tried three different devices and even more are listed on

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-06-01 Thread BatteryKing
[solved] I seem to have found and fixed the problem and so have some confirmation I was on the right track in my previous post. Specifically in file common.c line 3328 I changed: if (ioctl(s, ioctl_cmd, )) { debug_printf(LOG_NOTICE, FNAME, "failed to %s an address on %s: %s",

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-05-30 Thread BatteryKing
I made some headway in figuring this out. One thing I did not understand was T1 and T2 time and so was looking at the logs at the vltime hour mark. The proper place to be looking for the first error was at the T1 mark when the renew operation takes place. At this point the following happens in

[Bug 1559741] [NEW] wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-03-20 Thread BatteryKing
Public bug reported: This is on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64-bit with the last update done on 03/09/2016. I setup wide-dhcpv6 client on my home network to grab IPv6 addresses from my ISP. The /128 address for my firewall is fine and after 24 hours I see in the logs the address just for this external

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-03-27 Thread BatteryKing
I have found evidence that the wide-dhcpv6 version in Ubuntu 14.04 at least was written on a 32-bit architecture and never properly redesigned for a 64-bit compilation. The evidence for this found in the source code goes as follows: 1. Consistent use of the printf formatter %ul for 32-bit int

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-03-20 Thread BatteryKing
No. As I am understanding the linked documentation, if you are setting up a wide-dhcpv6 server, this can be specified. However seeing I am not an ISP, but instead a customer, I am relegated to being a client and specifying these parameters do not seem to be an option for the client. Especially

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-03-20 Thread BatteryKing
If it helps, I have been documenting my setup in a templated format here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2279612 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559741 Title: wide-dhcpv6

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-04-25 Thread BatteryKing
Got distracted for a bit, but finally got some testing done. It looks like I was only partially right in that the display formatter was wrong, so now I am seeing the correct time displayed. There is still something going wrong with the dhcpv6 subnet update. Will have to spend more time to

[Bug 1559741] Re: wide-dhcpv6 client apparently sets incorrect PD specfic vltime

2016-04-25 Thread BatteryKing
I noticed going through the avahi docs that this is used by Apple apparently. Also Cox says there is a compatibility issue with the Apple Airport Extreme and IPv6 failing after a day with the resolution being restart the device. My issue is the IPv6 update for the subnet fails after 24 hours or

[Bug 1643345] Re: nvidia-367 367.57-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-367 kernel module failed to build [Makefile:81: recipe for target 'modules' failed]

2016-11-22 Thread BatteryKing
I spent some time going through posts and trying various things. The best I can reckon from all information gathered so far is something about the upgrade process from 14.04 to 16.04 trips things up for the Nvidia driver build. If Ubuntu 16.04 is installed from scratch, people report it works,

[Bug 1643345] [NEW] nvidia-367 367.57-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-367 kernel module failed to build

2016-11-20 Thread BatteryKing
Public bug reported: The default selected nvidia driver 367 does not work in Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit. Hangs on build. Ran killall make in order to get updates to complete. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: nvidia-367 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 1643345] Re: nvidia-367 367.57-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-367 kernel module failed to build [Makefile:81: recipe for target 'modules' failed]

2016-11-30 Thread BatteryKing
Scott, I tried the same things and got more or less the same result. The older drivers compile, but the machine crashes early in boot. If I remember correctly, this was the case all the way up to 364. Anything above, and I tried all the way up to 375, and it won't compile. I suspect the older

[Bug 1643345] Re: nvidia-367 367.57-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-367 kernel module failed to build [Makefile:81: recipe for target 'modules' failed]

2017-03-25 Thread BatteryKing
A baseline test I did was to update both a VM with a fresh install of Ubuntu 16.04 and my laptop where I upgraded from 14.04 to 16.04. With both systems up to date (March 25th, 2017) I tried to install the the latest Nvidia 375 drivers. It installed on the VM (though it is kind of worthless

[Bug 1643345] Re: nvidia-367 367.57-0ubuntu0.16.04.1: nvidia-367 kernel module failed to build [Makefile:81: recipe for target 'modules' failed]

2017-04-09 Thread BatteryKing
I did some poking around to see if I could figure out the root cause. I found there are a whole lot of differences between doing a fresh install of 16.04 and upgrading from 14.04 to 16.04 in terms of how the system is actually setup, so a quick let's try to find the one thing off was not going to