** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu
Is this really necessary - hostname is Essential, isn't it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822613
Title:
etckeeper should depend on hostname
To manage
I can confirm this on a ThinkPad X201 as well - and replacing cgroup-bin
with cgroup-lite fixed it for me too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838729
Title:
x200
Am 18/11/11 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
Looks like something that should be upstreamed to samba.
This doesn't affect upstream. The way in which the netbios name is
generated is specific to Debian/Ubuntu.
Cheers,
Jelmer
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
libverto or libevent don't provide integration for talloc, which is one
of the key features of libtevent.
At the very least you would need a wrapper layer in libldb and sssd
around libevent or libverto.
Samba 4/OpenChange/Evolution-mapi (in universe) also rely on tevent and
the fact that libldb
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #651168
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651168
** Also affects: etckeeper (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651168
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Package changed: etckeeper (Ubuntu) = bzr (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https
Why did you end up with a pending lock - was there another bzr commit
instance still active for /etc?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800656
Title:
Update Manager
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
Bazaar can indeed create hardlinks when it creates a checkout (so can
e.g. git) but it doesn't explicitly version the fact that hardlinks
exist somewhere. The warning here is about the latter category.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug
The new feature flags feature might be useful for this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322327
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership diff output for
Hi Timo, Jamie,
On 02/10/2012 08:22 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Jamie, thank you for the review!
Debian will have 1.5.16 as soon as I've passed the Debian Maintainership
process, if not uploaded by a sponsor earlier. I'm also hopeful that
squeeze will get 1.8.x which is what I'm preparing for
On 02/10/2012 09:30 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Jelmer, that would be great. I'll ping you early next week. Ding-libs
needs to go first and sssd after that.
Cool - I'm 'jelmer' on IRC.
ps. I have a whole lot of other packages too if you're interested to
sponsor them (389ds, freeipa related) ;)
Re-opening - this bug is still open upstream, and while there have been
changes in this area of the code I'm pretty sure none of them have
affected the rewriting of fields in SWAT.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because
Thanks for the bug report.
Ideal would indeed be to update the tutorial to use bzr.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Can you attach your smb.conf? That way we should be able to see if this
is a bug in the configuration dialog or Samba.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945117
Title:
Sorry, my bad. I meant the usershare file that was created by the
nautilus plugin.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945117
Title:
can't edit files in my public guest
I don't think deja-dup should support SMB urls as it doesn't use gvfs as
far as I can tell.
You should indeed be able to use mount.cifs to mount the share, but that
doesn't involve Samba, just the cifs kernel module.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = ubuntu
--
You received this bug
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662243
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: samba
Importance: Unknown = Undecided
** Changed in: samba
Status: Fix Committed = New
** Changed in: samba
Remote watch: Debian
nautilus is using libsmbclient, which is a part of Samba.
mount.cifs is unrelated to Samba; the mount utilities itself are a part
of the cifs-utils package, the actual implementation lives in the
kernel.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https
Ideally we should have provision generate /etc/samba/named.conf.samba or
something alone those lines instead; this would make it unnecessary to
provide custom apparmor rules for the configuration file. It would be
nice if bind provided some sort of mechanism that allowed external
applications to
Hi Tyler,
+1 on the diff, that looks good.
Note that an alternative to shipping the second patch is to update the
generated files from the package itself, so the diff isn't massive; this
would require adding make -C source3 samba3-idl as part of the build
step and adding libparse-yapp-perl to
Hi Thomas, why the prefix? This is already associated with the samba4
package.
** Summary changed:
- samba4: integrate with bind package
+ integrate with bind package
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
This happens because samba-common doesn't read the workgroup from
smb.conf.
can you try running debconf-show samba-common ?
** Summary changed:
- installation successfull but package still complains
+ samba-common doesn't read workgroup from smb.conf
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) =
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #667999
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667999
** Also affects: bind9 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667999
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Also affects: samba4 (Debian) via
Something killed bzr earlier, and there is still an open lock for it.
You might want to run sudo bzr break-lock /etc.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Converted to question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etckeeper/+question/202609
--
You
This is a samba-common issue, since the samba4 postinst script gets the
workgroup from samba-common's debconf config - and that has invalid
data.
** Package changed: samba4 (Ubuntu) = samba (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Hi Abhi,
wrt (1); the realm should usually be the uppercased version of the DNS domain
name, not the NetBIOS domain name.
(2) is fixed in newer versions of samba4, those present in quantal.
You can install samba4 as something other than a DC by selecting
standalone in debconf. The priority of
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075456
Title:
wrong path given in README
Note that samba4 build-depends on some packages that are not in main,
most notably subunit (MIR @ bug 780767), heimdal and libparse-yapp-perl.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
** Summary changed:
- error is displayed if no changes are good to commit on post-install
+ [bzr] error when encountering large file
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- Update Manager can not proceed if there is a lock on /etc
+ [bzr] breaks with locks on /etc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800656
Title:
** Branch linked: lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/raring/etckeeper/merge-0.64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482986
Title:
Tracks some unnecessary/autogenerated files
To
** Summary changed:
- etckeeper tries/fails to autocommit on clean trees with shelved changes
+ [bzr] tries/fails to autocommit on clean trees with shelved changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075456
Title:
wrong path given in README
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:02 +, Johan Fornander wrote:
The source code in the official samba git (source/lib/util.c) seems to
use HOST_NAME_MAX and I found an inconsistency in the code base:
source/lib/replace/replace.h:
384 #ifndef HOST_NAME_MAX
385 #define HOST_NAME_MAX 255
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 13:28 +, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Okay, I think I've found the issue, based on a crash with liferea:-
At wins.c:95, we have
DEBUGLEVEL = 0;
Somewhere in source3/include/debug.h, we have
#define DEBUGLEVEL *debug_level
extern int DEBUGLEVEL;
In
Nobody is actively working on this bug, either in Ubuntu or upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17829
Title:
swat rewrites fields incorrectly
--
This looks like a potential dupe of bug #596064.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818617
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
to figure out the right directories,
rather than hardcoding them.
** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu
How does this relate to samba 4? The attached files don't seem to
reference it in any way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830129
Title:
package samba
This can't be a Samba problem - Samba doesn't use DBus in any way.
--
DBus Error samba
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271942
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I can confirm this works in intrepid.
--
bind9 does not support gssapi updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158197
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
When using GSS-TSIG it is necessary to specify a keytab file for bind,
which should be lockable. The attached patch adds an entry in the
apparmor file to allow bind to read and lock this file.
** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
** Attachment added: named.apparmor.gssapi.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18150999/named.apparmor.gssapi.diff
--
apparmor exception missing for keytab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277370
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
gdbcommands is unrelated - it's a file that only gets used when smbd
crashes and can't cause slowdown of Samba.
I guess this may be a regression in 3.2.
--
Samba transfer of multiple files very slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286678
You received this bug notification because you are a
This seems like an issue with the wireless driver to me.
--
large samba transfers kill wireless
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292895
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
These header files don't provide a stable API - there are no public and
private headers in Samba at the moment; function signatures may change
between minor releases. It should be possible to provide these headers,
but it requires splitting the headers up in upstream first.
** Changed in: samba
FWIW, API changes in security releases do happen. The second-to-last
security release changed several function signatures, for example
(http://us5.samba.org/samba/ftp/patches/security/samba-3.0.29-CVE-2008-1105.patch).
We as upstream don't install all of these headers as-is intentionally.
At the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 278864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 278864
package samba4 None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/samba4.list] failed to
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/nsstest', which is also in
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 03:53:14PM -, Matthias Klose wrote:
looks ok, runs the tests, has a symbols file,leaving the bindings in
universe
Override component to main
ldb 1:1.1.16-1 in trusty: universe/devel - main
1 publication overridden.
Override component to main
libldb1
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:10:17AM -, Didier Roche wrote:
Everything is green but samba4 (when I tried to seed it yesterday). Just
ping me once the MIR is approved and I'll handle it.
The samba4 source package should no longer be necessary in trusty, just the
samba source
package (which is
What appears to be happening is that the first time nmbd gets run
testparm fails (because pid dir /var/run/samba doesn't exist yet) so
nmbd is not started.
After that smbd gets run and its pre-init will create /var/run/samba. So
the next time nmbd's pre-init script will work.
--
nmbd fails to
It looks like the creation of /var/run/samba should happen earlier in
the script.
What about the attached patch?
--
nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
** Package changed: etckeeper (Ubuntu) = bzr-webdav (Ubuntu)
--
not installing http[s]+webdav
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676418
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 20:52 +, Jean-Michel Dault wrote:
It should be:
mkdir -p /var/run/samba
Otherwise if the directory already exists it won't be able to start. So
mkdir -p will start in all conditions.
I'm pretty sure install -d exits with success if the directory already
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694953
Title:
missing i386 libraries on amd64
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Yes, that's a regression... it is due to the order in which directories
are created at startup. There's an existing bug report about it, I don't
recall the number.
Cypher2 nathanel.tit...@gmail.com wrote:
but the point is that it does not not start automatically like it used to..
I have to call
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 596064 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 596064
nmbd fails to start on boot - problem with upstart
* You can subscribe to bug 596064 by following this link:
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648609
Title:
unable to unmount broken cifs mount
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
As far as I know this call needs a NetBIOS name, so I don't think this
is a bug or a regression. Does smbclient -I IP -L netbios-name
work ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
** Tags added: upstart
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652065
Title:
dhclient hook assumes wrong service name (samba instead of smbd)
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620322
Title:
stale cifs mount can't be unmounted: This utility only unmounts
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260396
Title:
cifs.mount: mapchars + utf8 = loop
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117730
Title:
cannot use sqlite3 on cifs mount
--
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117727
Title:
cifs mounts: unable to move dangling symlinks (case
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620382
Title:
smbmount allows mounting the same ressource multiple times on
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539791
Title:
mount.cifs cannot mount a DFS share when using Kerberos
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427896
Title:
Cannot unmount a windows network share.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
Please note that cifsfs is not in the smbfs package but partially in
the kernel and partially in cifs-utils.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
** Package changed: samba (Ubuntu) = cifs-utils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257411
Title:
mount.cifs ignores iocharset even specified
--
@munchkinguy The Samba-Team are the upstream developers of Samba, they
don't maintain Samba in Ubuntu. The Assigned field is usually used to
set the person that's actually actively working on an issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Does anybody have a backtrace with the debugging symbols for
libnss_wins.so.2 installed? Having the relevant line numbers would be
very helpful in resolving this issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 13:20 +, Firas Kraïem wrote:
Debian doesn't use that revision anymore, but they don't mention this
problem in the changelog for the newer ones, so I guess it is still
present. I will report it.
Debian doesn't force the use of --as-needed at link time (yet?) as far
as I
Debian doesn't include samba.schema either.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #190162
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=190162
** Also affects: samba (Debian) via
There's no need to compile samba from source to get the schema, as far
as I know upstream doesn't install the schema. You can get the schema
from the examples/ directory though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
** Changed in: bzr (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to etckeeper in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322339
Title:
Integrated permissions/ownership reset on file operations
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd fails to start on boot
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2
This might be related to my fix for bug 596064.
What does 'testparm' output for you? Do you have 'disable netbios' set?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 707561
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** This bug has
to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707546
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
Thanks for the feedback. I managed to reproduce it, preparing a patch
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
The attached patch fixes the issue for me.
** Patch added: proposed patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/707563/+attachment/1807356/+files/707563.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 707563 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707563
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 707563
package samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de
sortie
1 - 100 of 3227 matches
Mail list logo
