[Bug 481203] [NEW] Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-12 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: The client machine is a Karmic koala that DOES ssh forwarding ok against othe servers (mostly fedoras or Ubuntu Hardy desktops) [The problem IS NOT ON THE client side, as it does the jobs correctly against other servers] The failing (ssh) server machine is a Ubuntu Hardy LTS

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-12 Thread Jose L. VG
Ah, something a forgot to mention. I compared a ssh -vvv session against a working fedora server and could not see any difference except for that in the hardy server, once the ssh connection is established, when I do gedit (or xhost +) I just get the error 'can't open display' and no debug info

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-16 Thread Jose L. VG
X11Forwarding is ON: ... X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 ... And xauth is installed, when I connect (the first time or after removing .Xauthority) I get: /usr/bin/X11/xauth: creating new authority file /home/admin/.Xauthority The Display variable is OK: $ echo $DISPLAY localhost:10.0

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-16 Thread Jose L. VG
# Package generated configuration file # See the sshd(8) manpage for details # What ports, IPs and protocols we listen for Port 22 # Use these options to restrict which interfaces/protocols sshd will bind to #ListenAddress :: #ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 Protocol 2 # HostKeys for protocol version 2

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-12-05 Thread Jose L. VG
Openssh forwards X sessions correctly after the /etc/hosts is fixed with a correct localhost IP (127.0.0.1 instead of 127.0.1.1) ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

[Bug 489357] [NEW] After upgrading to karmic, /e/n/i network config (non NetworkManager) no longer works

2009-11-27 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: I had set up in Ubuntu 9.04 a network config fixed at /etc/netwrking/interfaces in a PC acting as a home printer server SO that users just have to switch ON the machine to access the server printer and shared folders but do not need to log in as any user. All WAS working

[Bug 500832] [NEW] After update grub2 won't boot on its own

2009-12-27 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: After some karmic update (I guess) my eee 901 won't start on its own, as it waits (for ever) for the user to select some boot option.This is quite annoying as it was working ok before. It could not be solved by touching the /etc/default/grub options. Maybe pushing GRUB2 on

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-12-05 Thread Jose L. VG
Openssh forwards X sessions correctly after the /etc/hosts is fixed with a correct localhost IP (127.0.0.1 instead of 127.0.1.1) ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

[Bug 489357] Re: After upgrading to karmic, /e/n/i network config (non NetworkManager) no longer works

2009-12-05 Thread Jose L. VG
Confirmed. There is some kind of regression at NetworkManager on Karmic that prevents it from releasing an interface configured at: /etc/network/interfaces The workarround for now is to remove the package network-manager (plus its companions network-manager-gnome, ...-kde, etc) and configure

[Bug 489357] Re: After upgrading to karmic, /e/n/i network config (non NetworkManager) no longer works

2009-12-05 Thread Jose L. VG
Apart from the bug itself I would like to ask why on earth is Network Manager (NM) NOT DESIGNED to ALSO enable system-wide fixed networks settings per interface? NM is ok for most laptops, but when on a workstation or any other system providing services to other machines NO becomes completely

[Bug 481203] [NEW] Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-12 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: The client machine is a Karmic koala that DOES ssh forwarding ok against othe servers (mostly fedoras or Ubuntu Hardy desktops) [The problem IS NOT ON THE client side, as it does the jobs correctly against other servers] The failing (ssh) server machine is a Ubuntu Hardy LTS

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-12 Thread Jose L. VG
Ah, something a forgot to mention. I compared a ssh -vvv session against a working fedora server and could not see any difference except for that in the hardy server, once the ssh connection is established, when I do gedit (or xhost +) I just get the error 'can't open display' and no debug info

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-16 Thread Jose L. VG
# Package generated configuration file # See the sshd(8) manpage for details # What ports, IPs and protocols we listen for Port 22 # Use these options to restrict which interfaces/protocols sshd will bind to #ListenAddress :: #ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 Protocol 2 # HostKeys for protocol version 2

[Bug 481203] Re: Hardy 8.04.3 openssh does not forward X11 always cannot open display

2009-11-16 Thread Jose L. VG
X11Forwarding is ON: ... X11Forwarding yes X11DisplayOffset 10 ... And xauth is installed, when I connect (the first time or after removing .Xauthority) I get: /usr/bin/X11/xauth: creating new authority file /home/admin/.Xauthority The Display variable is OK: $ echo $DISPLAY localhost:10.0

[Bug 542343] Re: gnome-panel will not autostart on lucid

2010-05-21 Thread Jose L. VG
Same for me on a supposed to be stable release of a LTS version. -- gnome-panel will not autostart on lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 1001212] Re: Can't upgrade linux kernel 2.6.32-41 lucid

2013-01-16 Thread Jose L. VG
It turned out to be a very strange problem with our network. You could browse the web but you couldn't download big files (more than 5 or 10mb) cause they got corrupted. That is the cause of: bzip2: Data integrity error when decompressing. Input file = (stdin), output file = (stdout) It is

[Bug 1651389] Re: lintian warnings

2017-03-01 Thread Jose L. VG
I believe Lukazs already fixed most issues: $ lintian E: walinuxagent changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file zesty W: walinuxagent source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.7 (current is 3.9.8) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1651389] Re: lintian warnings

2017-03-01 Thread Jose L. VG
The maintainer is being handled on a separate bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1657528 ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1629797] Re: cloud-init seems to take most of yakkety slow boot time

2016-10-03 Thread Jose L. VG
Document with testing details ** Attachment added: "TestingyakketybootspeedregressionvsxenialinEC2.odt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1629797/+attachment/4753367/+files/TestingyakketybootspeedregressionvsxenialinEC2.odt -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1629797] [NEW] cloud-init seems to take most of yakkety slow boot time

2016-10-03 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: Seems yakkety is consistently taking 2-3 minutes to boot on EC2, compared to the ~30 seconds of the first boot and ~10 seconds thereafter in xenial. ** Affects: cloud-init (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dan Watkins (daniel-thewatkins) Status: New

[Bug 1628891] [NEW] /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades.d configs ignored

2016-09-29 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: In my tests the /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades.d directory does not seem to be taken into account for overriding the configuration at: /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades Testing on trusty, I have tried this file: [DEFAULT] # Override prompting behavior to 'never'

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-10-27 Thread Jose L. VG
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603581 Title: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released To manage

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-07 Thread Jose L. VG
Above debdiff code can be found in PPA: https://launchpad.net/~josvaz/+archive/ubuntu/wala-2.1.5-xenial-backport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603581 Title: Azure Linux Agent

[Bug 1638960] Re: [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5

2016-11-07 Thread Jose L. VG
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1603581 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603581 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1603581 Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-07 Thread Jose L. VG
This is the debdiff from xenial, it has been tested from a PPA using both given regression cases. ** Patch added: "lp-1604423.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1603581/+attachment/4774030/+files/lp-1604423.debdiff ** Description changed: - As

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-07 Thread Jose L. VG
Debdiff updated to point to this public SRU bug Again, tested from a PPA using both given regression cases. ** Patch added: "lp-1604423.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1603581/+attachment/4774037/+files/lp-1604423.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-07 Thread Jose L. VG
Trusty backport PPA updated to: https://launchpad.net/~josvaz/+archive/ubuntu/trusty-wala-backport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603581 Title: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-10 Thread Jose L. VG
** Description changed: [Original Description] As discussed in an email, the Linux Agent (WALA) version 2.1.5 has now been signed off and is in Master now. Please find the details below of some of items built into this release : https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/releases

[Bug 1638960] Re: [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5

2016-11-07 Thread Jose L. VG
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638960 Title: [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5 To manage

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-10-19 Thread Jose L. VG
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Dan Watkins (daniel-thewatkins) => Jose L. VG (josvaz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1603581 Title: Azure Linux Ag

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-16 Thread Jose L. VG
Trusty debdiff from current trusty walinuxagent 2.1.3 The proposed package comes from the yakkety walinuxagent 2.1.5 package with no other chnages that the last changelog entry. ** Patch added: "lp-1603581-trusty.debdiff"

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-16 Thread Jose L. VG
Walinux agent 2.1.5 is abilable for testing in this public test images: Xenial: https://josvaz.blob.core.windows.net/shared/Ubuntu-xenial-16_04-LTS-amd64-server-20161020-wala2.1.5-os-2016-11-03-644FF1D6.vhd And also now for Trusty here:

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-18 Thread Jose L. VG
Xenial backput of walinuxagent 2.1.5 has passed the SRU tests according to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/walinuxagentUpdates SRU Test Cases These are automated tests: 1.) Build new cloud image with -purposed package 2.) Boot instance 3.) Confirm that instance provisioned 4.) Run standard tests and

[Bug 1638960] [NEW] [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5 in xenial

2016-11-03 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: [Impact] Version 2.1.5 introduced goal state processing extension, multi-nic improvements & several bug fixes: https://github.com/Azure/WALinuxAgent/releases [Test case 1]: Upgrade testing 1.) Launch instance on Azure 2.) Upgrade walinuxagent from -proposed 3.) Confirm that

[Bug 1638960] Re: [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5 in xenial

2016-11-03 Thread Jose L. VG
The attached debdiff has been tested from a PPA using both given regression cases. ** Patch added: "lp-1604423.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1638960/+attachment/4771880/+files/lp-1604423.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1638960] Re: [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5 in xenial

2016-11-03 Thread Jose L. VG
Patch diff against the wrong version (I generated from yakkety package) This is the debdiff from xenial, and again has been tested from a PPA using both given regression cases. ** Patch added: "lp-1604423.debdiff"

[Bug 1638960] Re: [SRU] Update walinuxagent to 2.1.5 in xenial

2016-11-03 Thread Jose L. VG
** Patch removed: "lp-1604423.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1638960/+attachment/4771880/+files/lp-1604423.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-03 Thread Jose L. VG
Walinuxagent 2.1.5 is ready for testing on this Xenial public image: https://josvaz.blob.core.windows.net/shared/Ubuntu-xenial-16_04-LTS-amd64-server-20161020-wala2.1.5-os-2016-11-03-644FF1D6.vhd We have done some tests on our own and we have started the SRU process to incldue the package in

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-11-04 Thread Jose L. VG
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: Dan Watkins (daniel-thewatkins) => Jose L. VG (josvaz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-14 Thread Jose L. VG
Marked verification-failed-trusty as this package version should not be released for trusty, instead we need to upload a new one with auto- update on. ** Tags added: verification-failed-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-14 Thread Jose L. VG
Our SRU tests passed but I will not mark as verified. We are to enable wala 2.1.5 autoupdates BEFORE we release 2.1.5 for trusty, so I need to update the package and re-upload to proposed. For xenial we already released a 2.1.5, so will need to do a full SRU again with autoupdates on (same as for

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-14 Thread Jose L. VG
Actually marked it verification-done-trusty. Talking to Dan it was clear that it will be less work at this point to get a trusty wala 2.1.5 out now and then diff the autoupdate on against it on the next SRU cycle. ** Tags removed: verification-failed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty

[Bug 1650522] [NEW] walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-16 Thread Jose L. VG
default is enabled AutoUpdate.Enabled=n AutoUpdate.GAFamily=Prod " After some discussion we have agreed Ubuntu packages for yakkety, xenial & trusty should enable AutoUpdate. ** Affects: walinuxagent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jose L. VG (josvaz) Status

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-16 Thread Jose L. VG
See also recent release work of walinuxagent 2.1.5 at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1603581 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650522 Title: walinuxagent

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-16 Thread Jose L. VG
This is now fix released, autoupdate neablement will happen on a separate tracking bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1650522 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-16 Thread Jose L. VG
** Changed in: walinuxagent (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650522 Title: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On To manage

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-13 Thread Jose L. VG
Hi Daniel, I also had this problem earlier today, the source page was there but not the binary. Dimitri & Steve fixed a dependency issue for me and I got the newly built amd64 package from proposed as expected. I am trying it on a test image as we speak. Check out again, if you can't still get

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-15 Thread Jose L. VG
Hi Daniel, It is difficult to quantify, but we decided to go on and release wala 2.1.5-0ubuntu4~14.04.0 cause: - It had actually passed verification already. - It introduced a delta we already verified and tested. If we threw away the package at this point next SRU will have to verify both the

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-01 Thread Jose L. VG
Trusty debdiff from current trusty walinuxagent 2.0.16 The proposed package comes from the yakkety walinuxagent 2.1.5 package with oine change: [ Steve Langasek ] * Drop systemctl reference from ephemeral-disk-warning.conf, this command doesn't exist in trusty. ** Patch added:

[Bug 1603581] Re: Azure Linux Agent (WALA) 2.1.5 Released

2016-12-02 Thread Jose L. VG
walinuxagent trusty backport test image has been refreshed: https://josvaz.blob.core.windows.net/shared/Ubuntu_DAILY_BUILD-trusty-14_04_5-LTS-amd64-server-20161130-wala-1480614674-en-us-30GB We aim for this image to enter proposed today as it has passed our manual tests. Can Azure test this

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
We have tested a new package version for yakkety both installing manually and in a test image: https://josvaz.blob.core.windows.net/shared/Ubuntu_DAILY_BUILD-yakkety-16_10-amd64-server-20161214-wala215-autoupdate-1482143205-en-us-30GB Please, do test the above image from the Azure side as well.

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
yakkety debdiff from latest updates to the proposed change ** Patch added: "lp-1650522.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1650522/+attachment/4794034/+files/lp-1650522.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
** Description changed: + [Original Description] + From Daniel Sol: " I was working on one of my 16.10 servers today and I was trying to get the Linux agent to take it latest goal state update and it was not doing anything. I looked in ./etc/waagent.conf and found it was disabled:

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
xenial debdiff from latest from updates to the proposed change ** Patch added: "lp-1650522-xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1650522/+attachment/4794044/+files/lp-1650522-xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
trusty debdiff from latest from updates to the proposed change ** Patch added: "lp-1650522-trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1650522/+attachment/4794047/+files/lp-1650522-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
zesty debdiff ** Patch added: "lp-1650522-zesty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1650522/+attachment/4794035/+files/lp-1650522-zesty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
removed the first yakkety attemp, will upload debdiff dor zesty now before yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650522 Title: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On To

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2016-12-19 Thread Jose L. VG
yakkety debdiff from latest from updates to the proposed change ** Patch added: "lp-1650522-yakkety.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/1650522/+attachment/4794036/+files/lp-1650522-yakkety.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1650522] Re: walinuxagent 2.1.5 needs to have AutoUpdate On

2017-03-24 Thread Jose L. VG
Following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/walinuxagentUpdates CPC automated SRU testing for proposed walinuxagent 2.2.6 has passed for all three suites; yakkety, xenial & trusty. These are the images with the proposed packages that have been tested: yakkety

[Bug 1661750] Re: WaLinuxAgent 2.2.6

2017-03-24 Thread Jose L. VG
Following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/walinuxagentUpdates CPC automated SRU testing for proposed walinuxagent 2.2.6 has passed for all three suites; yakkety, xenial & trusty. These are the images with the proposed packages that have been tested: yakkety

[Bug 1661750] Re: WaLinuxAgent 2.2.6

2017-03-24 Thread Jose L. VG
Links to the test images with walinuxagent 2.2.6 in proposed for Azure to test: yakkety https://josvaz.blob.core.windows.net/shared/Ubuntu_DAILY_BUILD-yakkety-16_10-amd64-server-20170320-wala226-proposed-1490097291-en-us-30GB xenial

[Bug 1676337] [NEW] bsdtar symbol lookup error: undefined symbol: archive_read_add_passphrase in yakkety

2017-03-27 Thread Jose L. VG
Public bug reported: bsdtar fails on yakkety. It was discovered while using vagrant, which could not unpack images due to this issues. The workaround was to use tar instead (by changing bsdtar into a link to tar), but bsdtar is still broken. $ bsdtar bsdtar: symbol lookup error: bsdtar:

[Bug 1676337] Re: bsdtar symbol lookup error: undefined symbol: archive_read_add_passphrase in yakkety

2017-03-27 Thread Jose L. VG
So the missing symbol is there, the problem is that it was not finding it for my native yakkety environment: $ nm -D /usr/bin/bsdtar | grep archive_read_add_passphrase U archive_read_add_passphrase $ nm -D /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libarchive.so.13 |grep

[Bug 1676337] Re: bsdtar symbol lookup error: undefined symbol: archive_read_add_passphrase in yakkety

2017-03-27 Thread Jose L. VG
conjure-up snap version was breaking bsdtar! $ sudo ldconfig -p |grep libarchive libarchive.so.13 (libc6,x86-64) => /snap/conjure-up/140/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libarchive.so.13 libarchive.so.13 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libarchive.so.13 $ sudo snap remove

[Bug 1676337] Re: bsdtar symbol lookup error: undefined symbol: archive_read_add_passphrase in yakkety

2017-03-27 Thread Jose L. VG
Something is strange here. It seems to work on a LXD container: $ lxc start y $ lxc exec y bash root@y:~# bsdtar The program 'bsdtar' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: apt install bsdtar root@y:~# apt install bsdtar Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree

[Bug 1661750] Re: WaLinuxAgent 2.2.6

2017-03-29 Thread Jose L. VG
As Azure confirmed they passed their tests too I will be marking this verified-done now. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1496730] Re: [SRU] xe-guest-utilities suddenly depends on cloud-init

2017-03-03 Thread Jose L. VG
In some occasions it can need to go before cloud-init. That happen recently to fix a bug for RAX: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cpc-rax/+bug/1657223 xe-deamon.service in that case had to go before nova-agent.service which in turn needed to go before ANYTHING expected the network to be configured,

[Bug 1669755] Re: Circular boot dependency cycle with cloud-init et.al.

2017-03-03 Thread Jose L. VG
I'd vote for the "DefaultDependencies=no" option as per experience with this RAX issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cpc-rax/+bug/1657223 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1669755 Title: