Public bug reported:
Currently, the latest version of Ubuntu encrypts new installations with
AES-256 (512 bits halved). But when you encrypt an external drive using
Ubuntu's default Format+Create LUKS partition once the operating system
is installed, it only encrypts it with AES-128 as far as I
This issue persisted with the 5.0.0-25 kernel update. I later tested
again after updating Mesa to 19.0.8. No change.
** Description changed:
Mesa's RADV performance has dropped nearly 40% across multiple
applications since upgrading my HWE kernel to 5.0.0-23.
Reverting to the 4.18
Tested additional mainline kernels installed via UKUU. 4.19.66 LTS
worked great. So did 4.20.17, the last in its series. The performance
regression appeared when I tested 5.0.3, and as noted above, still
persists in 5.2.8.
This may be a mainline kernel bug, but I'll leave it open here for
further
Public bug reported:
Mesa's RADV performance has dropped nearly 40% across multiple
applications since upgrading my HWE kernel to 5.0.0-23.
Reverting to the 4.18 kernel fixed the issue. The problem was still
present when testing kernel 5.2.8 from the Ubuntu mainline PPA.
My hardware:
AMD Radeon
I'm attaching the output of dmesg for 5.0.0-23
** Attachment added: "dmesg5_0_0-23.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe/+bug/1839750/+attachment/5282012/+files/dmesg5_0_0-23.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Description changed:
Mesa's RADV performance has dropped nearly 40% across multiple
applications since upgrading my HWE kernel to 5.0.0-23.
Reverting to the 4.18 kernel fixed the issue. The problem was still
present when testing kernel 5.2.8 from the Ubuntu mainline PPA.
My
** Description changed:
Mesa's RADV performance has dropped nearly 40% across multiple
applications since upgrading my HWE kernel to 5.0.0-23.
Reverting to the 4.18 kernel fixed the issue. The problem was still
present when testing kernel 5.2.8 from the Ubuntu mainline PPA.
My
I can reproduce it very easy: click install, a few forward clicks, choose
manual partition, choose sda11 as /, format as ext, and again a few forwards.
at 90% the installer mounts sda7-10 on /target and warnings come, at 94% the
installer quits.
cd integrity is ok.
(and sorry for my English)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
ubuntu live cd 20080416
click install, manual partion, choose /dev/hd11 as root. At 80-90% there came a
few warnings that the disk /target is full. Installer disapears somewhat later.
mount give this, last lines are strange:
proc on /proc type
** Attachment added: /var/log/installer/debug
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13528964/debug
--
installer crashes after mounting some filesystems on /target
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: partman
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13528969/partman
--
installer crashes after mounting some filesystems on /target
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I do not yet see any change in the phrase Guided - use entire disk nor a
warning except the one mentioned above, which can be easily overlooked..
daily-live 20080329
--
Installer deletes entire disk without warning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173954
You received this bug notification
Any progress?
It is still in Hardy 20080620.1
--
installer crashes after mounting some filesystems on /target
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: partman
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15316043/partman
--
installer crashes after mounting some filesystems on /target
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Yes, it is.
I suspect it has to do something with grub: i tried to install without
grub, and there was no problem. (Except that i did not manage to boot,
grub error 15, also chroot and grub-install did not work).
With grub installed on hd0 this are the results. (One can select (hd0,0)
to
Ubuntu 7.10 20070606.1 has simular problems: no /dev/sdX.
But it boots, and so i have some info:
** Attachment added: dmesg-lspci-vv-lspci-vvn
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8010775/dmesg-lspci-vv-lspci-vvn
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received
I changed my 10 gb western digital hard disk for a 6 gb Maxtor, and it
boots. I was able to install feisty on that disk.
I get some similar errors while booting, but not the port failed to
respond error.
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this
Fixed in 9.04 RC :)
--
installer crashes after mounting some filesystems on /target
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
No difference in the last daily-live.
If anyone want new log files, just ask.
--
installer crashes after mounting some filesystems on /target
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218391
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I don't have the system anymore, so I cannot test :(
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I think i have the same problem. After booting:
BusyBox etc.
etc.
(initramfs)
and after +-15 seconds this appear:
(initramfs)[92.774110] ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0xd0)
[95332400] ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
[95332450] ata2.00: (FMDMA
** Attachment added: Boot without quiet and aplash boot options
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7336694/PICT0003.JPG
--
Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Attachment added: part 2
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7336695/PICT0004.JPG
--
Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: last part
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7336697/PICT0005.JPG
--
Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
So I should open a new bug report? It seems a different error to me...
** Attachment added: sudo lspci -vvnn
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7338162/lspci
--
Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20
daily 20070415 doesn't boot. I get:
BusyBox etc.
etc.
(initramfs)
and after +-15 seconds this appear:
(initramfs)[92.774110] ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0xd0)
[95.332400] ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
Boot without quiet and splash boot options
** Attachment added: part 1
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7342446/PICT0003.JPG
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
** Attachment added: PICT0004.JPG
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7342448/PICT0004.JPG
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Attachment above was part 2
** Attachment added: part 3
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7342463/PICT0005.JPG
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: lspci -vv ,lspci -vvn and dmesg from Edgy live cd
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7342479/commands
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
Exit doesn't help, it gives a new Busybox/shell (including the error:
/bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off)
--
ata1: port failed to respond
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20
daily 20070415 doesn't boot. I get:
BusyBox etc.
etc.
(initramfs)
and after +-15 seconds this appear:
(initramfs)[92.774110] ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0xd0)
[95.332400] ata2.00:
I am having the same problem on a Sony Vaio when inserting a PCMCIA CF
adapter with CF storage card, on 2.6.20-10. This seemed to insert itself
at kernel release 2.6.17-ish and is still around... See attached dump of
dmesg, lspci, etc.
** Attachment added: uname+dmesg+lspci
The problem seems to have disappeared for me with the latest updates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649809
Title:
the session settings manager can try starting before the login
Seeing the same issue with a recent install of Ubuntu 11.10 x64, NVIDIA
SSD.
Happens on every boot. Logout Login seems to load everything properly
again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
And here are my specs with a before/after 2nd login screenshot...
Ubuntu 11.10
Kernel 3.0.0-14-generic
GNOME 3.2.1
Intel Core Duo CPU E7200
3GB DDR2
NVIDIA GT 520, Driver 280.13 (Proprietary with post-release updates)
64 GB SSD
** Attachment added: Before and After 2nd login screenshots
Same problem here with similar specs.
12.10 (64bit), Intel I7 Ivy Bridge with HD4000, 64GB SSD.
If I play around with the keyboard (random keys) long enough lightdm
sometimes eventually appears.
Completely new install with full updates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
@Agent24: Old HDD's are also susceptible to race condition bugs. It
just means one process is loading faster than another in a multi-process
system. If one process requires another as a precondition to run
correctly then the necessary checks should be made in the code.
--
You received this bug
** Attachment added: Tar of /var/log/dist-upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974745/+attachment/3012819/+files/faillog.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974745
Title:
Update
Public bug reported:
Got the popup:
Could not install the upgrades
The upgrade has aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A
recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a).
Please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug update-manager' in a
terminal and include the files in
The initial state of the indicator after login is correct BUT if I for
example reconnect my USB adapter, the wifi state goes out of sync (i.e.
the wifi would reconnect but the new 'connected' state is not reflected
in the indicator (i.e. wifi list not shown and wifi icon does not
appear)).
This
Ah ok, thanks for clarifying. I actually posted the comment here by
mistake - I was meaning to post it in one of the forums. I guess a lot
of users are waiting for nvidia support since 16.10 shipped with unity
8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
It seems the next version of mir (v0.25) will support nvidia.
See bug #1628478 at https://launchpad.net/mir/+milestone/0.25.0.
The bug milestone was changed to 0.25 from 0.26 a few days ago which
makes me think that much progress was made and hopefully an 0.25 release
is imminent.
--
You
Public bug reported:
There' s a problem on java compiler with the Eclipse WindowBuilder.
Especially with the "GTK+" theme on the WindowBuilder
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: javacc (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-32.36-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux
Public bug reported:
I did a "sudo apt dist-upgrade" and I reboot my computer. After that was
like my Wi-Fi device was damaged. I booted through the older kernel and
the problem wasn't there.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: kernel-bug
**
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9.2
the xulrunner fails most time during update or installation of new
pakages.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.8+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622585/+attachment/1512296/+files/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622585/+attachment/1512297/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Df.txt
47 matches
Mail list logo
