[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-04-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This is Debian Bug #541172 [1]. There's a patch available there at message #15 [2], but it didn't make into the package. It fixes the problem. Unfortunately it seems there's some issue contacting the package maintainers, given that bug's age. I tried to help there. [1]

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-04-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Meanwhile, is it possible to carry that patch in the Ubuntu package? This is the patch/debdiff for that, on top of the current source package in Trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-04-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Meanwhile, is it possible to carry that patch in the Ubuntu package? This is the patch/debdiff for that, on top of the current source package in Trusty. ** Patch added: net-tools_1.60-25ubuntu2.1.debdiff

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-05-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This has been fixed on the Debian package net-tools version 1.60-26, May 12th 2014. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541172 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to net-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-08-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chris, The package in -proposed fixed this bug. Test-case from description. Details below. root@ubuntu:~# apt-cache madison net-tools net-tools | 1.60-25ubuntu2.1 | http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ trusty-proposed/main ppc64el Packages [...]

[Bug 1318809] Re: Support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-15 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
I got news we have the patch on top of Ubuntu's src pkg available, and that it will be attached here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318809 Title: Support for the ppc64el arch To

[Bug 1318809] Re: Support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Matthias, I built a test version of the crash package for internal testing here. It's probably going to have its round of testing on Monday (due to timezone differences). It's just - the patches above in gdb-7.6-ppc64el.patch (filterdiff --strip=1 --addprefix=gdb-7.6/ patches/*.patch)

[Bug 1309576] Re: powerpc: Missing Turbo mode

2014-05-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Tim, Ok! The kernel in -proposed has those bits. They're working. The expected cpufreq files showed up in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/*, and frequency went up and down as expected when setting governors to performance, powersave, ondemand (default). -- You received this bug

[Bug 1309576] Re: powerpc: Missing Turbo mode

2014-05-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Question.. The powernv-cpufreq module is not automatically loaded by the kernel (even if put in the initramfs). Would it be possible to have it built-in (rather than as a module) in some time? As discussed on Ubuntu's kernel-team mailing list, it fails gracefully on non-compatible hardware

[Bug 1318809] Re: Support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Matthias, Yes, we need this for trusty. Thanks. ** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1318809 Title: Support for

[Bug 1321791] [NEW] Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-05-21 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: Bug originally reported and fixes provided by Brian Hart, IBM. Various warnings will be seen when building an out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare if any of the following are included: include/linux/bitops.h include/linux/cpumask.h include/linux/fb.h Seen on post-release

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-05-21 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The e-mail thread mentions 'Trusty SRU' on subject, but not sure where to reflect it on this bug's fields. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321791 Title: Warnings when building

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-05-21 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Patches submitted to the mailing list. [1] Marking this as confirmed since I confirmed Brian's report. [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2014-May/043098.html ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-05-21 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Tim asked for waiting the 2 commits in linux-next to make into linux. I'll ping him when that happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321791 Title: Warnings when building

[Bug 1312598] Re: fatal error: caught unhandled signal 11

2014-05-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This seems to be 1312623. The previous description there looks similar to this one: summary: - fatal error: caught unhandled signal 11 + fatal error: hadoop causes SEGV in OpenJDK Maybe this was marked invalid because of that. Then this should just be marked as

[Bug 1318809] [NEW] Support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: Hi, Is it possible to (discuss how to) enable the crash package to on the ppc64el arch? Recently the kernel received the config changes (CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y, CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y, currently in the -proposed pocket [1]) Is it hard to move to GDB 7.7? (ppc64el GDB package

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-05-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This has been fixed on the Debian package net-tools version 1.60-26, May 12th 2014. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541172 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251563

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-04-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This is Debian Bug #541172 [1]. There's a patch available there at message #15 [2], but it didn't make into the package. It fixes the problem. Unfortunately it seems there's some issue contacting the package maintainers, given that bug's age. I tried to help there. [1]

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-04-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Meanwhile, is it possible to carry that patch in the Ubuntu package? This is the patch/debdiff for that, on top of the current source package in Trusty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-04-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Meanwhile, is it possible to carry that patch in the Ubuntu package? This is the patch/debdiff for that, on top of the current source package in Trusty. ** Patch added: net-tools_1.60-25ubuntu2.1.debdiff

[Bug 1311128] [NEW] Please incorporate gcc 4.8 revision 209515

2014-04-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: From another, less public, bug: Text by Bill Schmidt: A GCC bug was found in the little endian vector API that affects use of the vec_mergeh and vec_mergel interfaces when VSX is enabled (this is the default for Power8). These interfaces produce the wrong results for 4x32

[Bug 1358505] Re: Need Ubuntu to preinstall ppc64-diag and other basic packages

2014-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358505 Title: Need Ubuntu to preinstall ppc64-diag and other basic packages

[Bug 1358505] Re: Need Ubuntu to preinstall ppc64-diag and other basic packages

2014-09-23 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Canonical / Adam, This is an issue for ppc64el guests too, as it impacts disk hotplug (internal bug reports). Fortunately, just installing ppc64-diag will bring in other required packages for this functionality (powerpc-ibm-utils and librtas pieces). [...] we need to look into where and

[Bug 1324544] Re: makedumpfile: kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz)

2014-10-01 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks, Chris! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324544 Title: makedumpfile: kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1364427] Re: kexec-tools: kexeced kernel hung

2014-10-01 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chris Laurent, Aren't these other 2 ppc64el-specific patches required too? - kexec/ppc64: Handle reserved memory ranges exported by OPAL firmware. - kexec/ppc64: Fix up ELF header and dt for PowerNV platform. I'm not knowledgeable in kexec, but I see those upstream post-2.0.6 as well. --

[Bug 1358920] Re: Swith kernel to vmlinuz (from vmlinux) on ppc64el

2014-08-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: ppc64el-vmlinuz-d-i.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1358920/+attachment/4181881/+files/ppc64el-vmlinuz-d-i.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1358920] [NEW] Swith kernel to vmlinuz (from vmlinux) on ppc64el

2014-08-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: Hi, May we discuss/implement switching the kernel image type/filename on ppc64el from vmlinu*x* to vmlinu*z* ? Problem: In the current situation, some issues occur because of 1) or 2): 1) the presence of /boot/vmlinu*x* w/ no debug symbols (vmlinux

[Bug 1358920] Re: Swith kernel to vmlinuz (from vmlinux) on ppc64el

2014-08-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks. For the record, I'll file bugs upstream for the userpace tools failing (discussed on irc). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358920 Title: Swith kernel to vmlinuz (from

[Bug 1325606] Re: grub-installer fails on disks 26th (restrictive shell pattern)

2014-08-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks for veryfing and confirming this :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325606 Title: grub-installer fails on disks 26th (restrictive shell pattern) To manage notifications

[Bug 1251563] Re: netstat command returns nozero even if successively executing

2014-08-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chris, The package in -proposed fixed this bug. Test-case from description. Details below. root@ubuntu:~# apt-cache madison net-tools net-tools | 1.60-25ubuntu2.1 | http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ trusty-proposed/main ppc64el Packages [...]

[Bug 1324544] Re: kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz)

2014-09-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: makedumpfile-vmlinux-trusty.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1324544/+attachment/4203116/+files/makedumpfile-vmlinux-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1324544] Re: kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz)

2014-09-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: makedumpfile-vmlinux-utopic.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1324544/+attachment/4203115/+files/makedumpfile-vmlinux-utopic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1324544] Re: kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz)

2014-09-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Attaching debdiffs for Utopic and Trusty. The patch fixes this issue: $ sudo kdump-config load Cannot open `/boot/vmlinuz-3.16.0-14-generic': No such file or directory * failed to load kdump kernel Test OK on Utopic: $ sudo kdump-config load Modified

[Bug 1324544] Re: kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz)

2014-09-16 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking as confirmed since this is hit / mentioned as part of LP #1352056 and LP #1350443 ** Changed in: makedumpfile (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1352056] Re: linux: kdump on Ubuntu 14.04 is not generating a dump.

2014-10-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chris, Thanks for fixing this out. One question: [Test Case] Taken from: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/CrashdumpRecipe [...] 2) increase crashdump size: sudo vim /etc/default/grub.d/kexec-tools.cfg set crashkernel=1024M Is there any possibility to make this value something

[Bug 1352056] Re: linux: kdump on Ubuntu 14.04 is not generating a dump.

2014-10-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@arges Ok! Thanks for letting us know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352056 Title: linux: kdump on Ubuntu 14.04 is not generating a dump. To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1325606] Re: grub-installer fails on 26+ disks (restrictive shell pattern)

2014-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Yes; updating the bug title to disambiguate. Thanks. ** Summary changed: - grub-installer fails on 26+ disks (restrictive shell pattern) + grub-installer fails on disks 26th (restrictive shell pattern) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1325606] Re: grub-installer fails on disks 26th (restrictive shell pattern)

2014-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
(according to this snippet in description) Problem: --- grub-installer fails on disks greater than the 26th disk. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325606 Title:

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks, Brian. I just passed along in the kernel-team mailing list, as Tim requested last time. I'll ping you once there are news. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321791 Title:

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-06-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
... guy is blazing fast; commits in master-next. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321791 Title: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare To manage notifications

[Bug 1318809] Re: crash tool support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Kalpana, Can you please test the version in -proposed? I dont have virsh handy in my environment, and kdump-tools is not quite working here (I'll follow up internally). (add the trusty-proposed repo as in comment #14, then reinstall the package, if the dev version is still there) $ sudo

[Bug 1318809] Re: crash tool support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Chris, Thanks, I see the new version in trusty-proposed. $ echo 'deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ trusty-proposed restricted main multiverse universe' | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/trusty-proposed.list deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ trusty-proposed restricted main

[Bug 1324544] [NEW] kdump-config load fails with vmlinux kernel (vs. vmlinuz)

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: On ppc64el, there's no vmlinu/z/, only vmlinu/x/. Thus, kdump-config load fails as follows: # kdump-config load Cannot open `/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-27-generic': No such file or directory * failed to load kdump kernel This small patch (attached) fixes the issue. It defaults

[Bug 1318809] Re: crash tool support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Chris, One of the bugs in the way for in-guest generated crash dumps is [1]. Is it possible for you to please help there, just to make it gets assigned quickly? Thank you very much, [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/makedumpfile/+bug/1324544 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1324571] [NEW] powerpc: enable powernv-cpufreq as built-in (vs. module)

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: The cpufreq driver for powernv is currently built as a module (powernv- cpufreq.ko; see bug 1309576). It is not automatically loaded in the boot process (even when included in the initrd). It is desirable to have it built-in so it automatically loads on systems booting in

[Bug 1324571] Re: powerpc: enable powernv-cpufreq as built-in (vs. module)

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi, This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem. [...] [...] This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team. Since the problem's diagnostic is clear (i.e., see the current config files), and the patch sent to the kernel-team

[Bug 1318809] Re: crash tool support for the ppc64el arch

2014-05-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks, Kalpana. Changing the tag to verification-done, as per Kalpana's comment #17, as requested on comment #12. [...] If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed

[Bug 1325606] [NEW] grub-installer fails on 26+ disks (restrictive shell pattern)

2014-06-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: Problem: --- grub-installer fails on disks greater than the 26th disk. Upfront, I acknowledge this is an unlikely scenario, but that problem was caught by test teams, and it might be worth fixing (proposal included below) for some application/cases/environments.

[Bug 1325606] Re: grub-installer fails on 26+ disks (restrictive shell pattern)

2014-06-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Attaching patch w/ 'solution proposal' (mentioned in description). ** Patch added: grub-installer-26plus-disks.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1325606/+attachment/4124172/+files/grub-installer-26plus-disks.patch -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1325606] Re: grub-installer fails on 26+ disks (restrictive shell pattern)

2014-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Phillip, Hm, that I'm not sure of.. IIRC that part of the code expects only the disk block device without the partition number, but I haven't gone through it in detail. (I guess the [0-9] range is there for disks named after sd1 or something like that, which I haven't seen yet, but recall

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-07-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The packages in proposed fix it. Thanks. $ ARCH=powerpc make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-`uname -r` M=`pwd` clean modules 21 | fgrep Wsign-compare include/linux/bitops.h:77:3641: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [-Wsign-compare] include/linux/cpumask.h:603:26: warning:

[Bug 1321791] Re: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare

2014-07-10 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For the record: $ uname -r 3.13.0-32-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321791 Title: Warnings when building out-of-tree module with -Wsign-compare To manage notifications

[Bug 1358920] Re: Switch kernel to vmlinuz (from vmlinux) on ppc64el

2014-08-28 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Thanks for all the effort involved. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358920 Title: Switch kernel to vmlinuz (from vmlinux) on ppc64el To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1358920] Re: Switch kernel to vmlinuz (from vmlinux) on ppc64el

2014-08-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Except that OPAL/petitboot cannot boot a zImage ... FAIL !~ Epic fail. Really sorry about that (and the effort involved). Apologies, everyone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358920

[Bug 1350443] Re: Not able to load the kdump kernel and generate the dump in Ubuntu14.10 on Non virtualised system

2014-09-02 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
AFAICT from the long description, this bug needs the patches from these 2 open bugs: LP #1324544 LP #1349994 Both in 'New' state, so meaning those patches haven't been committed/released in packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

2015-01-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Here's the installer screens confirming patch [1] (in comment #10) fixes the issue on ppc64el: Running Vivid installer, with priority=low. Go through Partition Disks - Guided - use entire disk - (select disk) - Separate /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions Before patch: --- -

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

2015-01-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Canonical / Brian @brian-murray, This bug is fixed with these 2 upstream commits in d-i partman-auto: - [1] ppc64el-only: Combine / and /usr partitions in ppc64el 'multi' recipe - [2] other archs: Combine / and /usr partitions in 'multi' recipes I confirm [1] fixes the issue for us

[Bug 1403982] Re: mini.iso installer cannot load additional components

2015-01-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@nio-wiklund Hi, not sure why it didn't work for your cmdline. If you're still interested in debugging, the option you entered is correct, as you can see on net-retriever source code: if db_get debian-installer/allow_unauthenticated [ $RET = true ]; then log Not

[Bug 1359439] Re: [ 7.287663] systemd-logind[1057]: Failed to start unit user@126.service: Unknown unit: user@126.service

2015-01-26 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@pitti Hi, Martin. Would you have any update on the process of resolving this (maybe someone/I can help?), or its severity (what's the impact?) Thanks a lot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

2015-02-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Canonical, @mathieu-tl Would you have any news on uploading the new/fixed ppc64el recipes for partman-auto in comment #10? Funny, yesterday there was an re-upload of the old/broken ppc64el recipes in partman-auto/118ubuntu5. :) Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1403982] Re: mini.iso installer cannot load additional components

2015-01-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
There's a workaround available meanwhile -- if you want to use the currently available netboot image, and can afford skipping the GPG checks/its implications. Append this to the kernel command line: debian- installer/allow_unauthenticated=true -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1413646] Re: 15.04: incomplete debug symbols package - please disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT or package the .dwo files

2015-01-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@apw thanks, Andy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413646 Title: 15.04: incomplete debug symbols package - please disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT or package the .dwo files To

[Bug 1413646] [NEW] 15.04: incomplete debug symbols package - please disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT or package the .dwo files

2015-01-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: The kernel option CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT has been enabled in vivid (commit bb5f2d940954fb389f16a0f7ad05b5a53a7e5227). It moves debuginfo to .dwo files, using gcc -split-dwarf. The kernel packaging received no updates to include the .dwo files, AFAICT. This results in

[Bug 1410669] Re: Not able to analyze the dump using crash tool

2015-01-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413646 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413646 ** Changed in: crash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1413646 15.04: incomplete debug symbols package - please disable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_SPLIT or

[Bug 1407714] Re: Ubuntu 15.04: netinstall/boot installation files not found on ppc64el ISOs

2015-02-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Adam, Thanks for looking into this. I'd like add another reason for your consideration :) Unless someone can give me a solid reason otherwise, however, I'm going to make this a wishlist priority, as the netboot kernel/initrd are published elsewhere ([...]), so it's merely a

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

2015-02-12 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, That's great news! Thank you ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410573 Title: Expert mode installation fails with error To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1349986] Re: Ubuntu fails to boot with multipath

2015-02-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1004243 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004243 This bug happened due to bug 1004243. Marking as duplicate. The problem was the /etc/multipath.conf file wasn't copied from installer to disk, as multipath detection failed (/sbin/multipath was missing

[Bug 1349986] Re: Ubuntu fails to boot with multipath

2015-02-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1004243 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004243 This bug happened due to bug 1004243. Marking as duplicate. The problem was the /etc/multipath.conf file wasn't copied from installer to disk, as multipath detection failed (/sbin/multipath was missing

[Bug 1349986] Re: Ubuntu fails to boot with multipath

2015-02-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1004243 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004243 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1004243 multipath installs not working -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1349986] Re: Ubuntu fails to boot with multipath

2015-02-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1004243 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004243 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1004243 multipath installs not working -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1400411] Re: Feature: cpuidle: Enable fastsleep and winkle in ubuntu 14.04.02 kernel

2015-02-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Adding tag 'verification-done-utopic' as requested in comment 13. Verification done internally, but the bug mirroring didn't fully did the tags. ** Tags added: verification-done-utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1403982] Re: mini.iso installer cannot load additional components

2015-01-27 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
You can find more info about that in preseed, debian installer options. Basically boot options taken by the installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1403982 Title: mini.iso

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

2015-02-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, I just verified with the new package, and it's all set. There's no /usr anymore, and / is 5.0 GB. Thank you very much. │ SCSI2 (0,1,0) (sda) - 34.4 GB QEMU QEMU HARDDISK │ 1.0 MB FREE SPACE │ #1 7.3 MBK │ #2 5.0 GBf ext4

[Bug 1410573] Re: Expert mode installation fails with error

2015-02-11 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Unrelated comment. It seems the bugproxy quite liked that post/comment it's been re-posting often. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410573 Title: Expert mode installation fails

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Steve, Given that we *know* that the UUID is not unique in the multipath scenario, and know this at install time, I think it's wrong for us to configure the system to reference filesystems via this non-unique identifier. I see your point. Although, I'm not sure it's technically

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
To illustrate the problem more clearly: The 'multipath' command is run *before* the disks over FC show up. It must wait for them to settle. There's a wait for SCSI devices already, but it is not enough in this case. (it actually doesn't work because scsi_wait_scan was removed from the kernel

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Constraints: 1) Can't count on udev rules to run 'multipath' (see bug 1431650) Ideas: 0) sleep when there's no scsi_wait_scan module. (below) 1) make sure related SCSI modules are loaded before scsi_complete_async_scans() (drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c) is called. 2) loop waiting for the number of

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
And illustrating the previous point (root filesystem on single-path device): (initramfs) cat /proc/cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinux-3.19.0-8-generic root=UUID=3809b2f8-dcb0-4a6a-945a-885e384b463e ro break=post-multipath (initramfs) ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid ...

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, The workaround seems good, but there still tends to be issues bringing up the multipath devices on boot with QEMU in my testing; just the workaround isn't always sufficient: break=pre-multipath then resuming helps out there. May you describe the issues you're seeing? I guess I

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, The workaround seems good, but there still tends to be issues bringing up the multipath devices on boot with QEMU in my testing; just the workaround isn't always sufficient: break=pre-multipath then resuming helps out there. May you describe the issues you're seeing? I guess I

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This looks like bug 1429327 ('multipath' runs *before* all disks show up). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431650 Title: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This looks like bug 1429327 ('multipath' runs *before* all disks show up). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431650 Title: Multipath devices take long to

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Nice comment on a lvm-devel thread: The removal of scsi_wait_scan doesn't actually mean any of the bus scans are done when you wait on systemd-udev-settle, so making that change won't really solve the issue you need. If I'm understanding it right, I think in a world without scsi-wait-scan,

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
FYI This problem becomes more evident/likely if the fix/work-around for bug 1431650 is applied (i.e., no udev time-out for multipath devices). It seems that the time-out that arises from that bug gives the SCSI scan time to complete, and by the time the last 'multipath' command runs

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This commit should fix this bug, and probably bug 1429327 as well. https://github.com/hreinecke/multipath-tools/commit/841977fc9c3432702c296d6239e4a54291a6007a It should allow multipath to be run in udev rules w/out timeout/killing (fixes this bug), and thus restore the functioning of

[Bug 1432062] Re: Ship the default /etc/multipath.conf on multipath-tools-boot (for user_friendly_names)

2015-03-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, Hi Mauricio, I'd be very interested in looking at the patches [...] Sorry for the delay. I missed this w/ some issue w/ email servers. I'll attach them soon.. just cleaning up 2 minor points. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1432062] Re: Ship the default /etc/multipath.conf on multipath-tools-boot (for user_friendly_names)

2015-03-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, Hi Mauricio, I'd be very interested in looking at the patches [...] Sorry for the delay. I missed this w/ some issue w/ email servers. I'll attach them soon.. just cleaning up 2 minor points. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This commit should fix this bug, and probably bug 1429327 as well. https://github.com/hreinecke/multipath-tools/commit/841977fc9c3432702c296d6239e4a54291a6007a It should allow multipath to be run in udev rules w/out timeout/killing (fixes this bug), and thus restore the functioning of

[Bug 1429327] Re: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk

2015-03-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Possibly good news. See bug 1431650 comment 10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429327 Title: ISST-LTE: system drops to initramfs after install on multipath disk To manage

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Updated replies to earlier comments: comment #6 I think this all goes back to multipath-tools updates that would help a whole lot; but they may be a little too intrusive past feature freeze -- I'm looking into just updating the udev rules now. Just to clarify/respond to that (earlier than

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, I did some research for the commit mentioned in comment #10. Its description clarifies (how/why) it solves this problem, and even others we would probably hit later (e.g., after booting, SCSI disks added/removed re-trigerring udev rules, and then involving multipathd). It's been

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Mathieu, I did some research for the commit mentioned in comment #10. Its description clarifies (how/why) it solves this problem, and even others we would probably hit later (e.g., after booting, SCSI disks added/removed re-trigerring udev rules, and then involving multipathd). It's been

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Updated replies to earlier comments: comment #6 I think this all goes back to multipath-tools updates that would help a whole lot; but they may be a little too intrusive past feature freeze -- I'm looking into just updating the udev rules now. Just to clarify/respond to that (earlier than

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Well, not necessarily. The swap issue is the same as the rootfs one Ah, yes, you're right. I was thinking with the assumption that the workaround/patch for the timeout was in place. Indeed, if it's not in place, there'll be no swap nor anything multipath'ed at all. In the particular case the

[Bug 1431650] Re: Multipath devices take long to initialize during initramfs

2015-03-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Well, not necessarily. The swap issue is the same as the rootfs one Ah, yes, you're right. I was thinking with the assumption that the workaround/patch for the timeout was in place. Indeed, if it's not in place, there'll be no swap nor anything multipath'ed at all. In the particular case the

[Bug 1430074] Re: d-i multipath disk-partition separator overhaul

2015-03-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Attachment added: Steps to Reproduce https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1430074/+attachment/4339388/+files/reproducing_mpathsep.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1430074] Re: d-i multipath disk-partition separator overhaul

2015-03-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Attachment added: Solution Testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1430074/+attachment/4339389/+files/testing_mpathsep.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1430074] [NEW] d-i multipath disk-partition separator overhaul

2015-03-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Public bug reported: This bug is an umbrella for a number of bugs in the debian-installer with common root cause: the different disk-partition separator used for multipath partition block devices by parted_server (libparted) and some components of the installer. The specific problems will be

[Bug 1430074] Re: d-i multipath disk-partition separator overhaul

2015-03-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: Patch to partman-base https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1430074/+attachment/4339390/+files/partman-base_mpathsep.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1430074] Re: d-i multipath disk-partition separator overhaul

2015-03-09 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Patch added: Patch to grub-installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1430074/+attachment/4339395/+files/grub-installer_mpathsep.debdiff ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >