[Bug 1175869] [NEW] coding error can lead to connections going to localhost rather than desired system

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: The bug is present in raring, but also in the upstream 3.0.0 release. This code from newsocket in sock.c: int herrno; struct sockaddr_in cli; struct hostent *hp; ... { struct hostent hent; char hbf[8192]; memset(hbf, '\0', sizeof hbf); /* for

[Bug 1175869] Re: coding error can lead to connections going to localhost rather than desired system

2013-05-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Robie Basak 1175...@bugs.launchpad.net writes: Thank you for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Ideally this bug would be fixed upstream, and we could cherry-pick the patch if necessary, until it filters through in a new release. I have tried to submit this bug upstream,

[Bug 1175869] Re: coding error can lead to connections going to localhost rather than desired system

2013-05-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The patch was accepted upstream. I don't know if it'll be included in a distro patch for debian, if so I guess we could pull that across into saucy? Dunno if this is worth a SRU (would be handy for me but...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1196440] [NEW] apache2-mpm-worker-dbgsym is uninstallable

2013-07-01 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: This is in a freshly created raring lxc with ddebs enabled and apache2 -mpm-worker installed: root@apache2test:~# apt-get install apache2-mpm-worker-dbgsym=2.2.22-6ubuntu5 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some

[Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
juju-core also depend on golang of course, which is also not available for arm64. Here is the status as of 2012-12-17 as I understand it: 1) Go a) there is a version of gccgo in trusty that can compile juju, but only with a patched version of the 'go tool' i) need kick these patches

[Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261452 Title: juju-core is unavailable for arm64 To manage

Re: [Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2013-12-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
John A Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com writes: So I tried this patch: === modified file 'testing/mgo.go' --- testing/mgo.go2013-11-06 13:38:01 + +++ testing/mgo.go2013-12-18 06:23:25 + @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ --noprealloc, --smallfiles,

Re: [Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2014-01-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com writes: Reworking the test suite to run the normal smoke tests minus the jstests suite results in a pass and successful build on all architectures including arm64 and ppc64el. That's pretty awesome. Now, do the juju tests pass? (Trick question I guess, juju

[Bug 1307265] [NEW] installation hangs if postgres is not listening on default port

2014-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: Hi, If there is no postgres listening on port 5432 (which can happen when, for example, you install 9.1 on saucy, upgrade to trusty, thereby installing 9.3 and then purging 9.1), and install maas this happens: Setting up maas-region-controller (1.5+bzr2236-0ubuntu1) ...

[Bug 1327021] [NEW] regression in snapshot performance in trusty

2014-06-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: 'nova image-create' is a lot slower on a trusty openstack than a precise one: +-+++---+ | ubuntu  | image  | disk size (GB) | snapshot time (s) | +-+++---+ | precise | cirros | 1  

[Bug 1361946] [NEW] patches for cgo on arm64

2014-08-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: Hi, I am attaching 5 patches that together with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.9/+bug/1361940 enable cgo to work on arm64 with gccgo. The patches are all rather small and could probably be rolled up into fewer, but well. Cheers, mwh ** Affects: gccgo-go

[Bug 1370049] Re: mongodb build disables scripting instead of using libmozjs

2014-09-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
libmozjs was removed in 2.6 which is what we have in utopic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mongodb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1370049 Title: mongodb build disables scripting instead of using

[Bug 1381967] Re: mongodb shell crash on arm64

2014-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The shell cannot work without js. It's a bug that binary is included in the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mongodb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1381967 Title: mongodb shell crash on arm64 To

[Bug 1381967] Re: mongodb shell crash on arm64

2014-10-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Yes, please use that PPA for any mongodb on arm64 work. It's a couple of point release behind I see -- someone (i.e. me I guess?) should update it to 2.6.5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mongodb in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1389897] [NEW] no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: There is currently no way to install just enough qemu to have kvm work. On x86 you can install qemu-kvm, but even on the other architectures where this is built (e.g. armhf) it depends on qemu-system-x86. Or you can install qemu-system but that installs way more than you

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Patch added: 0001-Increase-sanity-around-qemu-kvm.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1389897/+attachment/4254170/+files/0001-Increase-sanity-around-qemu-kvm.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Patch added: 0002-Install-usr-bin-kvm-wrapper-for-non-32-bit-power.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1389897/+attachment/4254171/+files/0002-Install-usr-bin-kvm-wrapper-for-non-32-bit-power.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Patch added: 0003-Handle-32-bit-powerpc.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1389897/+attachment/4254172/+files/0003-Handle-32-bit-powerpc.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here's a patch that does this, with help from Adam and Ben. You can see a more split out version at https://github.com/mwhudson/qemu/commits /qemu-kvm-arches. ** Patch removed: 0003-Handle-32-bit-powerpc.patch

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Bah, my patch runs into the dh_install can't rename a file thing. Maybe using dh-exec in a .install file is the answer? I'll try to do that later, but I need to disappear for a few hours first... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here's another attempt. Also not build tested yet. ** Patch added: qemu-kvm-arches-2.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1389897/+attachment/4254290/+files/qemu-kvm-arches-2.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
And finally one that builds a package that doesn't scare lintian. ** Patch added: qemu-kvm-arches-3.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1389897/+attachment/4254389/+files/qemu-kvm-arches-3.diff ** Patch removed: qemu-kvm-arches-2.diff

[Bug 1389897] Re: no way to install enough qemu for kvm in a cross platform way

2014-11-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Fair enough. I should say that the reason I filed this bug and tried my hand at a fix is so that devstack can just install the qemu-kvm package on any architecture to get enough qemu to make libvirt happy -- devstack/libvirt doesn't use the kvm wrapper script so I only did that bit to keep Adam

[Bug 1393583] [NEW] stdlib.go misses packages

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: Hi, somehow the list of stdlib packages in stdlib.go is missing a couple of standard library packages. This adds them (verified by diffing against the output of go list std). ** Affects: gccgo-go (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added:

[Bug 1287879] Re: fatal error running test suite on arm64

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: gccgo-go (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: gccgo-go (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to gccgo-go in Ubuntu.

[Bug 797915] Re: large bzr-svn imports failing

2011-06-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I don't know how relevant the point is, but one way out of this would be more progress during the importing of the tagged revisions -- the jobs are only killed after an hour of no output at all. Another option would be to raise the timeout in the system to allow the imports to pass. This will

[Bug 792849] Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

2011-09-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I see this on my i7 x220. Hard to say if it's the same cause, but it seems quite likely. No errors in any logs I can see. I can't ssh in to my machine when this happens, it's more than a GPU hang. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 881647] Re: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2012-01-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
For what it's worth, I reinstalled oneiric and have had flawless suspend and resume ever since. Which perhaps isn't very helpful, but it got rid of my problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 898398] [NEW] missing dependency on liburi-perl

2011-11-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: On a system with few other packages installed I had this problem until I installed liburi-perl: root@shard:~# conmux-console panda01 Can't locate URI/Escape.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/bin /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.12.4 /usr/local/share/perl/5.12.4 /usr/lib/perl5

[Bug 877883] [NEW] offlineimap occasionally deletes mail it has previously downloaded

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: Since upgrading to oneiric a few days ago, OfflineIMAP has taken to deleting mail that is present on the server from my local Maildir. The first time I ran it after upgrading it deleted a few thousand mails, then when I ran it again it redownloaded them again -- then when I

[Bug 877883] Re: offlineimap occasionally deletes mail it has previously downloaded

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think this is the issue detailed in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.offlineimap.general/3803 fwiw. I'll try grabbing the package from precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 877883] Re: offlineimap occasionally deletes mail it has previously downloaded

2011-10-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This change is the fix I think: https://github.com/nicolas33/offlineimap/commit/520e39d35536172d03b22d012cf4d8828687f2ff Any chance it can be SRUed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 877883] Re: offlineimap occasionally deletes mail it has previously downloaded

2011-10-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Yes, it seems better now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877883 Title: offlineimap occasionally deletes mail it has previously downloaded To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 881647] Re: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2011-10-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881647 Title: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 881647] [NEW] lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2011-10-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: After not having the slightest problem with suspend and resume in natty, in oneiric my x220 will suspend and resume exactly once per boot. Attempting to resume a second time leaves me with a flashing caps lock key. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package:

[Bug 881647] Re: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2011-10-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Some more data: 1) it suspends and resumes fine on ac power. 2) I seem to be able to suspend and resume an indefinite number of times using pm-suspend -- it's only when I close the lid that I have problems 3) if I close the lid, open, then pm-suspend it still oopses I'll have a play to see if

Re: [Bug 881647] Re: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2011-10-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
no_console_suspend doesn't appear to make any difference on this system, although it's always possible I'm not enabling it correctly. So bisection then :/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 792849] Re: Lenovo ThinkPad T420 random hardlocks with Sandy Bridge graphics

2011-11-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I've not had a single lock up on my x220 since installing oneiric (I had strange, likely unrelated, problems after upgrading). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792849 Title: Lenovo

[Bug 881647] Re: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2011-10-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Ah, on a whim I uninstalled virtualbox-dkms and it works again now... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881647 Title: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once To manage notifications

[Bug 881647] Re: lenovo x220 fails to resume more than once

2011-10-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Sadly, it seems to be more complicated than that -- the problem is back. I think perhaps it might be related to wifi... I'll do some more testing before conjecturing further though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 840937] Re: error when restoring already installed packages

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I had this problem too when crossgrading from Oneiric 32 bit to 64 bit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840937 Title: error when restoring already installed packages To manage

[Bug 888745] Re: upgrade option should indicate 32/64 bitness of old new operating system

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888745 Title: upgrade option should indicate 32/64 bitness of old new operating system To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 888745] [NEW] upgrade option should indicate 32/64 bitness of old new operating system

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: I'll attach a photo of this when I can get u1 to behave, but when I used a live cd to migrate a 32 bit install to a 64 bit install, I had to select the Upgrade Ubuntu 11.10 to 11.10 option to do what I want, and that seemed a bit silly. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 888747] [NEW] 'upgrading' from 32 bit to 64 bit leaves 32 bit kernel and grub options present

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: I used a LiveCD to 'upgrade' my accidental 32 bit install to a 64 bit install. On rebooting, selecting the default option in grub didn't boot but selecting the 'older versions' option in the menu and selecting the kernel presented there (actually exactly the same version)

[Bug 888751] [NEW] restoring installed packages failed when crossgrading 32 bit to 64 bit

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: As in bug #840937 I have no idea why, but when crossgrading 32 bit to 64 bit, restoring installed packages failed. Looking at /var/log/apt/history.log shows more :i386 markers than I expected to see, but I don't know if that is really a or the problem. ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 888751] Re: restoring installed packages failed when crossgrading 32 bit to 64 bit

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888751 Title: restoring installed packages failed when crossgrading 32 bit to 64 bit To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 888747] Re: 'upgrading' from 32 bit to 64 bit leaves 32 bit kernel and grub options present

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888747 Title: 'upgrading' from 32 bit to 64 bit leaves 32 bit kernel and grub options present To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 883993] Re: offlineimap 6.3.3 deleting messages erroneously

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I have installed the new version from oneiric-proposed. I'll try to follow up here in a few days, but if I don't come bearing screaming rage, it probably works ok :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 888745] Re: upgrade option should indicate 32/64 bitness of old new operating system

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is what it looked like for me: http://ubuntuone.com/2ldFv2txcbcmImcRQW87ZM -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888745 Title: upgrade option should indicate 32/64 bitness of old new

[Bug 840937] Re: error when restoring already installed packages

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is all the diagnostic information I got: http://ubuntuone.com/5aKVIKTGCs8w2yAdnTUDFw -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/840937 Title: error when restoring already installed packages

[Bug 883993] Re: offlineimap 6.3.3 deleting messages erroneously

2011-11-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Working for me too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883993 Title: offlineimap 6.3.3 deleting messages erroneously To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 745112] Re: [arrandale] desktop is messed up (goes black) when laptop is docked with two external 1920x1200 monitors (x86_64)

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I've had a pretty confusing time trying to get my new x220 working with an external display. Using Martin's packages, I have the external monitor working when the internal display is blanked (through an ultrabase, but I don't /think/ that's making a difference). Happy to test kernels with

[Bug 796369] [NEW] Authorize Passphrase Access dialog does not get focus

2011-06-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: seahorse-plugins When I do something that requires access to the gpg keychain (e.g. echo 1 | gpg --clearsign) I get a dialog asking if I want to authorize the passphrase access. This dialog doesn't take the focus, so I have to mouse around to get on

[Bug 745112] Re: [arrandale] desktop is messed up (goes black) when laptop is docked with two external 1920x1200 monitors (x86_64)

2011-06-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On my x220, I would agree that Timo's kernel is at least as good as any of the others I've tried (Martin's, 3.0.1.2 from oneiric). Suspend and resume works. Trying to enable both monitors leaves large black areas that are not drawn into, but I think that might be a unity problem. The summary of

[Bug 754470] Re: syndaemon consumes 100% CPU

2011-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I get a very similar traceback. It's not very illuminating! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754470 Title: syndaemon consumes 100% CPU -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 745112] Re: [arrandale] desktop is messed up with external monitors (x86_64)

2011-07-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I built a kernel at http://people.linaro.org/~mwh/x220 with Timo's fix (and also the fix for bug 761065) after today's natty update. It seems to work for me, but I'm extremely new to building kernels so please don't be too surprised if it breaks. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 377598] Re: [i945gm] Video corruption when disabling internal monitor

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
FWIW, it seems to finally be fixed for me in Maverick (although I had to use the xorg-edgers ppa because of bug 619663). -- [i945gm] Video corruption when disabling internal monitor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 484710] Re: laptop hibernates when plugged in to ac power

2010-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I haven't seen this bug for several months now (not since Lucid, at any rate), so closing. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- laptop hibernates when plugged in to ac power https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484710 You received this bug notification

[Bug 708883] Re: Panda board shuts down during boot

2011-01-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
With --verbose in bootargs, this is the tail end of the output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/559221/ ** Changed in: linux-linaro (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 708883] Re: Panda board shuts down during boot

2011-02-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I've seen similar things to Torez too, including the problem with today's image/hwpack. So while the OTG-powered stuff was interesting, I'm not sure that it had any relation to the problem this bug report was originally about... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 708883] Re: Panda board shuts down during boot

2011-01-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:49:36 -, Alexander Sack a...@ubuntu.com wrote: does this happen randomly or on every boot? Every boot that I've tried (maybe 4 or 5?). The board worked fine with some random set up rsalveti provided me with, but that didn't seem to have USB support so maybe it didn't

Re: [Bug 708883] Re: Panda board shuts down during boot

2011-01-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:55:19 -, John Rigby 708...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Some wild guesses: 1. Since this happens while enumerating USB devices it could be a power supply issue. I have seen boards work fine until the voltage dips as a result of USB devices getting turned on. 2. This

[Bug 636831] Re: omapdss kernel hang on shutdown

2010-09-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I agree. Closing the bug. ** Changed in: linux-linaro (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- omapdss kernel hang on shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636831 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 689213] Re: PPA sshd configuration

2010-12-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I'm not sure that Conch is behaving very differently here from openssh configured with the suggested options. OpenSSH says channel 2: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed where conch is saying channel 1: open failed: unknown channel type: unknown channel but that's it,

Re: [Bug 689213] Re: PPA sshd configuration

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:50:57 -, Julian Edwards 689...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: As far as I can tell, there's nothing actually going wrong here. I am interested in the two examples' different error messages though, why is one: Warning: remote port forwarding failed for listen port 8666

[Bug 690786] Re: omap3 boot hangs with u-boot-linaro-omap3-beagle=2010.09~rc1.1-0ubuntu4

2010-12-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I can confirm that -ubuntu3 works and -ubuntu5 doesn't; -ubuntu6 doesn't seem to have been published yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690786 Title: omap3 boot hangs with

[Bug 701679] [NEW] support yaffs2

2011-01-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: It would be really nice if we could mount yaffs2 images (as used by android) on ubuntu systems. If there's some good reason why this isn't supported, then a nice explanation in this bug report might show up nicely in google. Currently on maverick apt-cache search show

[Bug 1175869] [NEW] coding error can lead to connections going to localhost rather than desired system

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: The bug is present in raring, but also in the upstream 3.0.0 release. This code from newsocket in sock.c: int herrno; struct sockaddr_in cli; struct hostent *hp; ... { struct hostent hent; char hbf[8192]; memset(hbf, '\0', sizeof hbf); /* for

[Bug 1175869] Re: coding error can lead to connections going to localhost rather than desired system

2013-05-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Robie Basak 1175...@bugs.launchpad.net writes: Thank you for reporting this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Ideally this bug would be fixed upstream, and we could cherry-pick the patch if necessary, until it filters through in a new release. I have tried to submit this bug upstream,

[Bug 1175869] Re: coding error can lead to connections going to localhost rather than desired system

2013-05-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The patch was accepted upstream. I don't know if it'll be included in a distro patch for debian, if so I guess we could pull that across into saucy? Dunno if this is worth a SRU (would be handy for me but...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1183600] [NEW] --with-computed-gotos optimizations probably nullified by cse

2013-05-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: The packaging for python 3.3 enables the --with-computed-gotos flag to configure. But as discussed in the gcc documentation (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index- fgcse-781) the benefits of computed gotos are often eliminated by common subexpression

[Bug 982738] Re: Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffb88; RIP: 0010:[ffffffffa02bd6ed] [ffffffffa02bd6ed] ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_cb_irqsafe+0x1d/0xa0 [mac80211]

2012-05-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I'm now testing the mainline kernel: $ uname -r 3.4.0-030400-generic Will try to use wifi only for a few days and see if it recurs. FWIW, this hardware is certified on 12.04: http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/hardware/201108-8931/ so it's a bit sad that it doesn't seem to work perfectly!

[Bug 982738] Re: Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffb88; RIP: 0010:[ffffffffa02bd6ed] [ffffffffa02bd6ed] ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_cb_irqsafe+0x1d/0xa0 [mac80211]

2012-04-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
It just happened again :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982738 Title: Kernel Oops - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fb88; RIP: 0010:[a02bd6ed]

[Bug 1256281] Re: libgo tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Should the armhf and powerpc bits be different reports? I ran the testsuite on a newer version of 4.8 and a newer kernel and got better results: === libgo tests === Running target unix FAIL: math FAIL: net FAIL: reflect === libgo Summary === # of expected

[Bug 1256283] Re: go tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Again, should the problems on other arches be different bugs? These tests are also better with a newer package and kernel: === go tests === Running target unix FAIL: go.test/test/ken/cplx2.go execution, -O2 -g FAIL: go.test/test/peano.go execution, -O2 -g

[Bug 1256283] Re: go tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The more detailed failure log is not very informative: the peano executable just fails and the cplx2 one panics. Further investigation required. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256283

[Bug 1256281] Re: libgo tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
These failures are all quite interesting. --- FAIL: TestLog2 (0.00 seconds) all_test.go:2281: Log2(1) = 4.756597398230631e-17, want 0 all_test.go:2288: Log2(2**0) = 4.756597398230631e-17, want 0 FAIL

[Bug 1256283] Re: go tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Sorry for the spam! Here's round one of investigation. The peano test is a test for segmented stacks, which is not supported on aarch64. So perhaps the failure is unsurprising -- it's presumably smashing the stack. The cplx2 failure seems to indicate a pretty serious problem with floating

[Bug 1256283] Re: go tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oh, I misread the cplx2 failure. Here's a smaller test case: package main func main() { c5 := 1 + 3i cd := c5 / c5 println(cd) if cd != 1+0i { println(fail) } } Cross-compiling and running on the foundation model this gives:

[Bug 1256283] Re: go tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I filed the complex division bug as https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc- linaro/+bug/1266571 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256283 Title: go tests failing on AArch64 To manage

[Bug 1256281] Re: libgo tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The Log2 bug has been filed as https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=7074 ** Bug watch added: Go Issue Tracker #7074 http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=7074 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1256246] [NEW] gccgo/arm64: using channels before main starts is unreliable

2013-11-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: This is the distilled version of the problem that was causing the gcc testsuite to hang -- compile and run the attached. It hangs for me, but only on real hardware: I suspect a race that only occurs on multiprocessors. For extra fun, it _does not_ hang when compiled with

[Bug 1256246] Re: gccgo/arm64: using channels before main starts is unreliable

2013-11-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This (rather obvious) more aggressive version does hang when compiled with mainline though. ** Attachment added: whut6.go https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.8/+bug/1256246/+attachment/3920095/+files/whut6.go -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1256246] Re: gccgo/arm64: using channels before main starts is unreliable

2013-12-01 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Reported upstream as https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=6861 ** Bug watch added: Go Issue Tracker #6861 http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=6861 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1256246] Re: gccgo/arm64: using channels before main starts is unreliable

2013-12-03 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So I'm swinging back towards this being some kind of platform bug rather than a gccgo thing. The hung process has three threads each using 100% of a cpu in system time. strace shows that they are all in futex, this sort of thing: (t-doko)ubuntu@arm64:~$

Re: [Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2014-01-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com writes: Reworking the test suite to run the normal smoke tests minus the jstests suite results in a pass and successful build on all architectures including arm64 and ppc64el. That's pretty awesome. Now, do the juju tests pass? (Trick question I guess, juju

[Bug 1263806] Re: gccgo fails to compile tomb.go on arm64

2014-01-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is the traceback: (gdb) bt #0 0x00b6cf58 in error_at(unsigned int, char const*, ...) () #1 0x006d995c in frame_offset_overflow(long, tree_node*) () #2 0x006d9b90 in assign_stack_local_1(machine_mode, long, int, int) () #3 0x006dcc98 in

[Bug 1263806] Re: gccgo fails to compile tomb.go on arm64

2014-01-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
After some considerable prodding and poking, this seems to be a gcc bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59744 ** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #59744 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59744 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1256281] Re: libgo tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Turns out the compiler bug making the reflect tests fail to compile were masking another failure: --- FAIL: TestFunc (0.00 seconds) panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered] panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

[Bug 1256281] Re: libgo tests failing on AArch64

2014-01-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The reflect failure is a disagreement about ABI details: https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=7120 ** Bug watch added: Go Issue Tracker #7120 http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=7120 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1267761]

2014-01-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I saw the problem with Linaro GCC 4.8, but haven't tried the vanilla 4.8 branch. If the committed test case doesn't fail, I'll believe that it is not a problem. Sorry for the noise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1267761]

2014-01-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, thanks for the super fast fix. Could it be backported to 4.8? git cherry-pick gives a conflict in aarch64.md which is probably easy to fix if you know how this code works: (define_insn *compare_negmode HEAD [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM) (compare:CC (match_operand:GPI 0

[Bug 1256246] Re: gccgo/arm64: using channels before main starts is unreliable

2013-12-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I ran this on a newer kernel and it passed so closing. ** Changed in: gcc-4.8 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256246 Title: gccgo/arm64: using

[Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
juju-core also depend on golang of course, which is also not available for arm64. Here is the status as of 2012-12-17 as I understand it: 1) Go a) there is a version of gccgo in trusty that can compile juju, but only with a patched version of the 'go tool' i) need kick these patches

[Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1261452 Title: juju-core is unavailable for arm64 To manage notifications about

[Bug 1261604] [NEW] static binaries compiled with gccgo can fail to set up their address space

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: As reported in https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=6926, a static binary produced by gccgo will fail to start up around 60% of the time with a message like: runtime: address space conflict: map(0x7f72018000) = 0x7f69ef8000 fatal error: runtime: address space

Re: [Bug 1261452] Re: juju-core is unavailable for arm64

2013-12-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
John A Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com writes: So I tried this patch: === modified file 'testing/mgo.go' --- testing/mgo.go2013-11-06 13:38:01 + +++ testing/mgo.go2013-12-18 06:23:25 + @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ --noprealloc, --smallfiles,

[Bug 1274697] [NEW] patch required to ignore stdlib packages in 'go test'

2014-01-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: This could be part of gccgo-stdlib-ignore.patch perhaps or it's own patch, but either way something like https://github.com/mwhudson/faux/commit/35e015678dd297f02649ca1f534c2552d383f62e is required for 'go test' to work. ** Affects: gccgo-go (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 1274697] Re: patch required to ignore stdlib packages in 'go test'

2014-01-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
That diff doesn't apply to the go sources we are using. Attaching one that does. ** Patch added: go-test.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gccgo-go/+bug/1274697/+attachment/3963366/+files/go-test.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1274723] [NEW] go programs operate in 32-bit allocation mode

2014-01-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: I am having long and interesting conversations with upstream about how to fix this properly, but we also need a fix in time for trusty. The symptoms of this problem is that programs occasionally die with messages like: runtime: memory allocated by OS (0x7f67005000) not in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >