[Bug 1093013] Re: sensors-detect doesn't find fans on HP ProBook 6560b

2012-12-21 Thread Phillip Susi
Have you tried 12.10? ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093013 Title: sensors-detect doesn't

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-01-04 Thread Phillip Susi
kpartx is incorrectly mapping the entire extended partition, then building the logical partitions on top of the extended. Bad kpartx. ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-01-04 Thread Phillip Susi
I believe I have fixed the problem. Please add my PPA to your sources and update: sudo apt-add-repository ppa:psusi/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade ** Branch linked: lp:~psusi/ubuntu/raring/multipath-tools/fix-extended- partitions -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-01-05 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Did the other errors go away? Those were odd... looked like something dmraid might say but AFAIK it isn't run by update-grub. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined -

[Bug 1102135] Re: package odbcinst1debian2 2.2.14p2-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess rm cleanup returned error exit status 127

2013-01-22 Thread Phillip Susi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1103111 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103111 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1103111 Upgrade failure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to unixodbc in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1155107] Re: pwmconfig assumes no fan control from fans not stopping

2013-03-14 Thread Phillip Susi
Are you sure it actually speeds up when you set it too low? I have noticed that the Intel stock CPU fans seem to have a minimum speed they will refuse to go below, but when you try, it just refuses to go any lower rather than speeding up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1155403] [NEW] virtio cdrom detected as hard disk

2013-03-14 Thread Phillip Susi
Public bug reported: Trying to install Ubuntu or Debian using virtio to emulate the cdrom fails. This appears to be due to the drive appearing to be a hard disk, rather than a cdrom, despite the media=cdrom argument to qemu. I'm not sure if this is a bug in qemu, or the kernel virtio driver?

[Bug 1155403] Re: virtio cdrom detected as hard disk

2013-03-15 Thread Phillip Susi
The current raring version, which appears to be 1.4.0+dfsg-1expubuntu3. Also I guess this should be under just the qemu package now rather than -kvm. The command line is qemu -drive file=whatever.iso,if=virtio,media=cdrom. With or without the media argument seems to make no difference; either way

[Bug 1163573] Re: Ubuntu 12.10 overheats my laptop until it shutdowns without notice

2013-04-03 Thread Phillip Susi
You will need to seek support from your hardware vendor since overheating is a hardware defect. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1163573] Re: Ubuntu 12.10 overheats my laptop until it shutdowns without notice

2013-04-04 Thread Phillip Susi
Unless you have setup fancontrol ( which it seems you have not ) then lm-sensors nor any other component in Ubuntu is in control of your fans. The hardware controls them, and you said they do speed up so it sounds like that hardware control is working properly. You may be able to run the

[Bug 68729] Re: Loses all backups when disk is full

2013-05-09 Thread Phillip Susi
Closing this bug due to lack of input for over a year. ** Changed in: backuppc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68729

[Bug 72944] Re: Always complains about PID file

2013-05-09 Thread Phillip Susi
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively

[Bug 56235] Re: Postfix fails to start at boot time

2013-05-12 Thread Phillip Susi
Without a way to reproduce the problem, and the fact that the conf file in the package does not look like that, I don't think we have a bug here. Combined with a lack of input for several years, I think it's time this is put to rest. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =

[Bug 277648] Re: libdevmapper does not load its kernel modules upon install

2013-05-13 Thread Phillip Susi
I believe the modules are now auto loaded on demand. Is this still an issue for you? ** Package changed: devmapper (Ubuntu) = lvm2 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-05-28 Thread Phillip Susi
** Branch linked: lp:~psusi/ubuntu/precise/multipath-tools/fix-dmraid- extended-partitions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093918 Title: grub-probe

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-05-28 Thread Phillip Susi
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) = Phillip Susi (psusi) ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided = Critical ** Changed in: multipath-tools

[Bug 253895] Re: postinst doesn't handle failure of dnshostname

2013-06-07 Thread Phillip Susi
** Summary changed: - upgrading to 8.10 + postinst doesn't handle failure of dnshostname ** Changed in: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged ** Changed in: kerberos-configs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 242869] Re: dnsmasq's dhcp blocked to clients by firestarter

2013-06-18 Thread Phillip Susi
This package has been removed from Ubuntu. Closing all related bugs. ** Changed in: firestarter (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1194390] Re: known issue in current version

2013-06-26 Thread Phillip Susi
I guess I haven't had to modify my sieve scripts in a while since I didn't notice this until I came across this bug report, but yea, since upgrading my server to quantal, I can't modify my sieve scripts as managesieved just crashes every time. ** Tags removed: dovecot managesieved segfault sieve

[Bug 1194390] Re: managesieve crashes, fixed upstream

2013-06-26 Thread Phillip Susi
Looks like debian already fixed it and that version made it into raring. ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1198491] Re: sensors not detect my sensors [ SMSC LPC47M172 ]

2013-07-06 Thread Phillip Susi
As sensors-detect said, there is no driver for this chip, so this is not a bug. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-07-09 Thread Phillip Susi
** Description changed: kpartx was mapping the entire extended partition then stacking the logical partitions on that device. This exposes a device that otherwise appears to be an entire disk device containing the logical partitions, and this confuses grub. The extended partition is

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Phillip Susi
Before running dmraid -ay, what does blkid show? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2013-07-18 Thread Phillip Susi
If /dev/mapper/pdc_ebdeeaiceb does not exist without you having to run dmraid, then it is unrelated to this bug. Please file a new one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-10-06 Thread Phillip Susi
The '-part' is an argument to the '-p' switch, so it also needs removed from the kpartx command, and needs to follow the '-p' switch to dmraid, if that switch is added there, but I do not think it should be, for the same reason that it should be removed from kpartx. The reason that dmraid handles

[Bug 556167] Re: vmbuilder uses parted to create disk images, which leads to broken sector counts (cannot use grub2 on disk images created by vmbuilder/parted)

2011-11-07 Thread Phillip Susi
Parted defaults to leaving the first 1 MB of the disk empty these days, regardless of the cylinder size. I just tested it by creating a 1 gb file and having parted mklabel msdos, then mkpart using 0% and 100% as the start and end positions, and the partition starts at sector 2048 even though the

[Bug 887599] [NEW] unable to configure or uninstall dovecot-postfix

2011-11-08 Thread Phillip Susi
Public bug reported: I installed dovecot-postfix, and it failed to configure. The same error apparently prevents it from being removed as well, so now I'm stuck with a broken package. The error is: newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: invalid character 40(decimal): devserv.(null) newaliases:

[Bug 887599] Re: funny characters in hostname causes dovecot to fail to configure

2011-11-08 Thread Phillip Susi
It turned out it was the postfix package that was the problem, and apt was just trying to configure it each time I tried to remove dovecot- postfix. After purging and reinstalling dovecot it picked up the corrected hostname and configured correctly. ** Summary changed: - unable to configure or

[Bug 556167] Re: vmbuilder uses parted to create disk images, which leads to broken sector counts (cannot use grub2 on disk images created by vmbuilder/parted)

2011-11-15 Thread Phillip Susi
Ok, I think I see the problem in parted. I assume that vmbuilder uses the output of parted's print free command to decide where to start the new partition, and that shows the free space starts at 16.4kb. Specifying that as the start position for the new partition would result in the too small

[Bug 556167] Re: vmbuilder uses parted to create disk images, which leads to broken sector counts (cannot use grub2 on disk images created by vmbuilder/parted)

2011-11-16 Thread Phillip Susi
The bios geometry just shouldn't matter. Sure, it is odd that it uses a different geometry for an image file than a disk, but whether the nonsensical geometry specifies 63 or 32 or 3 sectors per track, partitions are supposed to have a 1mb alignment these days. This is what you get if you

[Bug 212370] Re: Have to modprobe coretemp manually in order to get CPU temperatures on MacBook Pro

2011-12-07 Thread Phillip Susi
As Steve said, this isn't an lm-sensors issue, so closing the lm-sensors task. Kernel team: would there be any harm in simply building the module into the kernel always? Virtually all modern intel CPUs use this, and on CPUs that don't support it, it should have no effect. ** Changed in:

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-12-09 Thread Phillip Susi
** Branch unlinked: lp:~psusi/ubuntu/natty/multipath-tools/fixrules ** No longer affects: dmraid (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737027 Title:

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-12-10 Thread Phillip Susi
The broken rules have been removed upstream and should be merged down into debian and ubuntu before long. dmraid will continue to handle the partitions itself because if it doesn't, it is unable to deactivate the array. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-12-10 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It won't work, and no, I don't have a link. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7kIAEACgkQJ4UciIs+XuLfIwCeL7u3zq0IJJ4M97Z2k6opbBid

[Bug 884177] Re: fancontrol cannot read its own configuration file

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
You must write a config file for it by hand or using pwmconfig. ** No longer affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu Oneiric) ** No longer affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu Precise) ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 264200] Re: lm-sensors not recognized.

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
This is really a question but since it was also filed as a question at the time, and been answered, I'm just going to close the bug now. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 352987] Re: lm-sensors report incorrect values of CPU temparature

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
This appears to be a hardware defect that needs a workaround in the kernel k8temp driver. Such a workaround may already be in place. Is this still an issue with Ubuntu 11.10? ** Package changed: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =

[Bug 884177] Re: fancontrol cannot read its own configuration file

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Config files don't contain messages, they configure fancontrol to work. Is the man page not sufficient? I suppose the package could have a debconf question that prompts you to run pwmconfig when you install it... ** Summary changed: - fancontrol cannot read its own configuration file +

[Bug 884177] Re: fancontrol should have debconf prompt to run pwmconfig

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Yes, that's exactly the idea. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884177 Title: fancontrol should have debconf prompt to run pwmconfig To manage notifications about

[Bug 884173] Re: sensors returning a bogus temperature reading

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Unfortunately, lm-sensors has no way of knowing whether or not your particular motherboard has the sensor properly wired. If you wish to hide sensors that your motherboard does not correctly use, then you can edit /etc/sensors3.conf. See man sensors.conf. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu)

[Bug 894047] Re: Fansensor unavailable under Ubuntu 11.10 on Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
It looks like you do not have any supported sensors. You mention that this worked on a previous release. Can you boot that release and provide the results of running sensors-detect there? Also you might want to answer yes to the question to probe i2c devices. ** Changed in: lm-sensors

[Bug 710040] Re: does not support atom d525

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Please provide the output of the sensors command. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710040 Title:

[Bug 478762] Re: lm-sensors don't work

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
This report has become an extended support discussion, and does not describe an actual bug, therefore I am closing it. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 591128] Re: sensord cannot RRD log with multiple chips

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591128 Title: sensord cannot RRD log with multiple

[Bug 885107] Re: resuming after suspend looses control on fan speed, which is kept at 100%

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
Are you using the fancontrol package? ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885107 Title:

[Bug 885107] Re: resuming after suspend looses control on fan speed, which is kept at 100%

2012-01-20 Thread Phillip Susi
If so, can you provide the config file, and try running the following: sudo /etc/init.d/fancontrol stop sudo fancontrol Then try to suspend, resume and see if there are any errors? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 885107] Re: resuming after suspend looses control on fan speed, which is kept at 100%

2012-01-23 Thread Phillip Susi
It looks like you have not configured fancontrol so it isn't actually working. Can you try removing the package and see if the behavior remains the same? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.

[Bug 920956] Re: Kpartx interferes with automount behaviour

2012-01-24 Thread Phillip Susi
When this happens, what is the output from the following commands: sudo dmsetup table sudo kpartx -l /dev/sdb1 ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 885107] Re: resuming after suspend looses control on fan speed, which is kept at 100%

2012-01-31 Thread Phillip Susi
Then it isn't a bug in lm-sensors, but in the hardware/firmware of the motherboard. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-16 Thread Phillip Susi
) = Phillip Susi (psusi) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-16 Thread Phillip Susi
Wait a second, the kpartx udev rule shouldn't have anything to do with dmraid. The dmraid udev rule takes care of running kpartx. ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-19 Thread Phillip Susi
The -p is to disable dmraid's internal handling of partitions in favor of letting kpartx take care of it. This was done because kpartx also supports GPT, but dmraid does not. Can you try updating your initramfs and see if that helps? sudo update-initramfs -u Also please make sure you are

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-19 Thread Phillip Susi
What do you mean by added kpartx hooks? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-19 Thread Phillip Susi
Ok, kpartx has a hook rule that is supposed to do that already, but for some reason, it is not being installed. It looks like a packaging error of some sort. ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
I've fixed both packages to get this working and set up an isw dmraid with my old disks and installed precise and the updated packages to verify it works. Just waiting for a sponsor to merge the changes. ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = In Progress ** Changed in:

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-03-30 Thread Phillip Susi
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Critical ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2012-04-30 Thread Phillip Susi
The broken/nonfunctional udev rule has not yet been removed in kpartx, but 12.04 uses kpartx to activate dmraid partitions and so supports GPT. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-05-01 Thread Phillip Susi
Adi, dmraid is for fake hardware raid support, not the software raid you are using. Your issue seems to be unrelated to dmraid or this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 992409] Re: lm-sensors reports incorrect temperature

2012-05-01 Thread Phillip Susi
Can you please boot the 10.10 livecd and verify that you still get a correct reading there, and also run the following command and attach the resulting file ( DSDT.gz ): sudo cat /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT | gzip -c - DSDT.gz ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 992409] Re: lm-sensors reports incorrect temperature

2012-05-02 Thread Phillip Susi
This looks like a kernel regression. We will need to narrow down where it was introduced. Could you try 11.04 and 11.10 next? ** Package changed: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot

2012-09-24 Thread Phillip Susi
Unless you must dual boot this system with Windows, the best thing to do is not to use fake raid. Switch to regular Linux software raid instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1078922] Re: Fan runs unnecessary

2012-11-15 Thread Phillip Susi
Have you installed lm-sensors and configured fancontrol? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078922 Title: Fan runs unnecessary To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1062310] Re: ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS failed to sensor cpu , board and fans , by sensors-applet and lm-sensors

2012-11-15 Thread Phillip Susi
Are you saying that this has been fixed in 11.10? ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062310

[Bug 1078922] Re: Fan runs unnecessary

2012-11-15 Thread Phillip Susi
If you aren't using fancontrol, then there's no bug here. Without that, the fans are controlled by the hardware in response to temperature rise. You have nothing to worry about as far as damage goes as processors are intended to handle 90-100 C, so even 52 is quite cool. Often times the system

[Bug 1078922] Re: Fan runs unnecessary

2012-11-16 Thread Phillip Susi
Can you boot 12.10 using the kernel from 12.04 and see the lower temperature come back? ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1078922] Re: Fan runs unnecessary

2012-11-17 Thread Phillip Susi
Then I'm afraid I have to stand by what I said before: this isn't a bug. You will need to look into your motherboard manual to see if there are settings you can tune for the fan. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1078922] Re: Fan runs unnecessary

2012-11-18 Thread Phillip Susi
Please stop changing the status. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078922 Title: Fan runs

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-05-01 Thread Phillip Susi
** Also affects: dmraid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Phillip Susi (psusi) ** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu) Importance

[Bug 1212492] Re: cc_growpart broken if parted resizefs found

2013-08-14 Thread Phillip Susi
Currently the only way to have parted resize a busy partition is to use interactive mode rather than script mode and say yes at the prompt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1212444] Re: cc_growpart failed in auto grow mode with Error: Could not stat device resizepart - No such file or directory. with parted 2.3-14

2013-08-16 Thread Phillip Susi
Looks like the arguments to parted are backwards. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1212444 Title: cc_growpart failed in auto grow mode with Error: Could not stat

[Bug 1212492] Re: cc_growpart broken if parted resizefs found

2013-08-16 Thread Phillip Susi
You have to not use --script and parse the output for the warning and answer yes. I have been mulling over a --force-things system to allow a script to specify that it expects a specific error and how it should be handled but it isn't easy the way libparted is structured. -- You received this

[Bug 1212492] Re: cc_growpart broken if parted resizefs found

2013-08-16 Thread Phillip Susi
IIRC, parted assumes --script mode when stdin is not a tty. There was an undocumented switch that the test suite uses to override this, or I thought that expect allocates a pseudo tty (might need a switch) and that should also do the trick. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2013-09-04 Thread Phillip Susi
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.3 = ubuntu-12.04.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093918 Title: grub-probe

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2014-01-09 Thread Phillip Susi
** No longer affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Quantal) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093918 Title: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid To manage

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2014-01-09 Thread Phillip Susi
The backport to precise is still waiting for someone to test and verify it, see comment #56. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093918 Title: grub-probe

[Bug 1267890] [NEW] assertion failure and hard hang switching resolution

2014-01-10 Thread Phillip Susi
Public bug reported: I booted the 13.10 live cd using -vga std ( since the default cirrus no longer works correctly ) and it comes up using the full resolution of my real screen, which is annoying since the window does not fit no the screen. I went into the display control pannel to switch to a

[Bug 1267890] Re: assertion failure and hard hang switching resolution

2014-01-10 Thread Phillip Susi
The full command line was: qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -m 1200 -drive if=virtio,file=img,cache=unsafe -drive if=ide,file=Downloads/trusty- desktop-amd64.iso,media=cdrom -vga std -boot d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 1093918] Re: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

2014-01-15 Thread Phillip Susi
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093918 Title: grub-probe auto-detection fails on raid

[Bug 1212492] Re: cc_growpart broken if parted resizefs found

2014-01-17 Thread Phillip Susi
You don't use ---pretend-input-tty in conjunction with --script. The point is to pretend that you are a human, not a script. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1212492

[Bug 1078922] Re: Fan runs unnecessary

2014-02-10 Thread Phillip Susi
If the proprietary amd graphics driver is causing excessive heat, you will need to take that up with amd, or stop using the proprietary driver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu.

[Bug 585027] Re: Race condition with dmsetup causes 'map already present' messages

2011-03-17 Thread Phillip Susi
I have been looking for a race condition that sometimes causes problems with dmraid devices. Can you be more specific about the nature of this race? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in ubuntu.

[Bug 737027] [NEW] kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-03-17 Thread Phillip Susi
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: multipath-tools The kpartx udev rule runs modprobe -Qba dm-multipath every time a device mapper device is added or changed. Not only is this a waste of resources, but it fails because modprobe has no -Q switch. It also has this rule:

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-03-17 Thread Phillip Susi
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #618700 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618700 ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618700 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Branch linked:

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-03-17 Thread Phillip Susi
Checked Debian sid and they seem to have dropped the modprobe rule. Created branch to drop both rules, and fix the other rule that tries to match on dmraid=* to DMRAID-*. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
The modprobe was added in Ubuntu, but the dmraid- is also there in debian. It looks like it has been changed to a lower case -q in Natty, but I'm still running Maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools

[Bug 712840] Re: local-top should pass -p part, not -p p

2011-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
I believe this change is incorrect and should be reversed. The -p switch should not be used at all and kpartx should use its usual rule of adding 'p' when the previous character is a digit, as this has been the rule always used on Linux for forming partition names. -- You received this bug

[Bug 712840] Re: local-top should pass -p part, not -p p

2011-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
I agree that deviating from upstream should be avoided without good cause, but by using this switch, Debian is deviating from upstream. Are you aware of a good reason for this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 712840] Re: local-top should pass -p part, not -p p

2011-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
Also as I mentioned in bug #737027, the dmraid part of this rule is broken due to case mismatch. I don't have a multipath installation to check, but I suspect it suffers from the same problem and so the rule isn't run at all anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
I'll just drop the part about the -Q then, rather than file a new bug about the other parts, especially since I already have it linked to the debian bug about the rest. Still the rules trying to match multipath and dmraid and run kpartx are broken. The one for dmraid should not be there at all,

Re: [Bug 712840] Re: local-top should pass -p part, not -p p

2011-03-23 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/23/2011 09:18 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: Also as I mentioned in bug #737027, the dmraid part of this rule is broken due to case mismatch. I don't have a multipath installation to check, but I suspect it suffers from the same problem and so

[Bug 737027] Re: kpartx udev rule is broken

2011-04-05 Thread Phillip Susi
Either kpartx should create the partitions or dmraid should, not both. You are right that dmraid does not understand GPT, so for that to work, kpartx should be run instead, but then dmraid needs to be asked not to create the partitions and let kpartx handle it for both types of partition table.

[Bug 42376] Re: hibernate should hide grub menu

2014-03-06 Thread Phillip Susi
What does Windows have to do with it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42376 Title: hibernate should hide grub menu To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1320415] [NEW] postfix started in single user mode during upgrade

2014-05-16 Thread Phillip Susi
Public bug reported: I shutdown my server to single user mode and ran a dist-upgrade. The postfix postint started the daemon, even though it is not supposed to be running in single user mode. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1320415] Re: postfix started in single user mode during upgrade

2014-05-16 Thread Phillip Susi
Just created a fresh install of 13.10 in a vm, swapped /etc/apt/sources.list to trusty, shutdown to single user mode, confirmed with runlevel that the system was in single user mode, and ran apt-get install postfix to upgrade it, and sure enough, it it started postfix. ** Changed in: postfix

[Bug 1320415] Re: postfix started in single user mode during upgrade

2014-05-16 Thread Phillip Susi
It looks like the problem is in invoke-rc.d: manually running invoke- rc.d postfix restart, while in single user mode, starts postfix. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = sysvinit (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1322625] Re: sensord daemon does not detects chips

2014-05-23 Thread Phillip Susi
What? There doesn't seem to be any such thing as module-init- tools.conf. The modules in /etc/modules are loaded by /etc/init.d/kmod, which runs in rcS.d, before anything in rc2.d. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1322625] Re: sensord daemon does not detects chips

2014-05-23 Thread Phillip Susi
Ahh, you must be still running 12.04. This was fixed after 12.04 by switching from module-init-tools to kmod. ** Changed in: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1322625] Re: sensord daemon does not detects chips

2014-05-23 Thread Phillip Susi
Then you should upgrade to 14.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322625 Title: sensord daemon does not detects chips To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1322625] Re: sensord daemon does not detects chips

2014-05-23 Thread Phillip Susi
Sure, but only critical fixes get backported to older releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322625 Title: sensord daemon does not detects chips To manage

[Bug 1348945] Re: -lsensors doesn't link to libsensors

2014-07-29 Thread Phillip Susi
Probably because redhat has an older version of gcc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348945 Title: -lsensors doesn't link to libsensors To manage notifications

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >