[Bug 225411] [NEW] [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

2008-05-01 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vim-latexsuite After upgrading to Hardy from Gutsy, I've installed vim-latexsuite $: sudo apt-get install vim-latexsuite $: vim-addons install latex-suite $: vim-addons status # Name User Status System Status [SNIP] latex-suite

[Bug 225411] Re: [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

2008-05-01 Thread Yusef Maali
** Attachment added: vim-latexsuite.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14071667/vim-latexsuite.patch -- [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225411 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 145268] Re: libtunepimp-dev conflicts libraptor1-dev

2008-08-08 Thread Yusef Maali
I'm still having this problem. I'm on a Kubuntu Hardy 8.04.1, x86 platform. I'm attaching apt-cache results: $: apt-cache show libtunepimp-dev Package: libtunepimp-dev Priority: optional Section: libdevel Installed-Size: 1084 Maintainer: Ubuntu Core Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 225411] Re: [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

2008-05-08 Thread Yusef Maali
Save the patch somewhere, i.e. /tmp/vim-latexsuite.patch Then: $: cd /usr/share/vim/registry/ $: sudo patch -p0 /tmp/vim-latexsuite.patch Done. vim-latexsuite package has to be already installed. I hope to be helpful :) -- [hardy] vim-latexsuite doesn't work

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-12-22 Thread Yusef Maali
For the intel board it was a purely Bios issue. Please check if you have an upgrade for your netbook. Otherwise I think you should write to the MSI support, highlighting this bug report. MSI may have to update their Bios's board. Yusef. -- x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Robert, in my atom box the patched kernel still doesn't work... I have to admit that I have used no conventional method: I have compiled the kernel with a live 8.10 x86_64 kubuntu on a Core2Duo (and it compiles in less than 5 hours ;) I have booted the atom box with a netboot debian live

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
I have done my test with an Ubuntu Hardy server (8.04.1) x86_64. The new kernel doesn't work... :( I get the same kernel panic... It is behaving in a very strange way, because the third time I've tried to boot, it worked!! After that, only kernel panics. Very very strange... I need to buy a

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Robert, thanks for your help! Yes, it is a random pattern... sometimes it boots, sometimes it don't... Also in my case the kernel is around 250Mb, as you suggest I have attached my .config I'm rebuilding with your config file. With a simple diff, I'm not able to see if there are differences

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
and the git log (~100 lines...) Thanks again. Yusef ** Attachment added: git.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19709787/git.log -- x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-16 Thread Yusef Maali
But the config file you have attached, is the one installed with a clean Intrepid x86_64 server edition? I was started from that one. Thanks, Yusef -- x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279186 You received this bug notification

[Bug 315677] [NEW] Wrong dhcp rules for ufw

2009-01-09 Thread Yusef Maali
to correct the problem. I'm using Intrepid/8.10 with both Kubuntu and Ubuntu Server and both have this issue. ufw package installed is 0.23.2. Best Regards, Yusef Maali ** Affects: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Wrong dhcp rules for ufw https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 315677] Re: Wrong dhcp rules for ufw

2009-01-09 Thread Yusef Maali
** Attachment added: correct dhcp rule in /etc/ufw/before.rules http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21069227/before.rules.patch -- Wrong dhcp rules for ufw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 315677] Re: Wrong dhcp rules for ufw

2009-01-09 Thread Yusef Maali
on a machine that is also a dhcp client (perhaps it has no sense...), you need both rules... Please close this bug as invalid. Regards, Yusef Maali ** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Visibility changed to: Private -- Wrong dhcp rules for ufw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 774780] [NEW] Upgrading from Maverik to Natty has replaced mdadm with dmraid, making the system unbootable

2011-05-01 Thread Yusef Maali
the mdadm package. I have chrooted into the broken installation, purged the dmraid package and forced the re-installation of the mdadm package. Now my upgraded Natty x86_64 is working like a charm :) Please ask me for more information, if needed. Thanks for your great work! Yusef Maali

[Bug 54020] Re: Kernel panic on install on amd64

2008-11-11 Thread Yusef Maali
(20080522ubuntu22 and 20080522ubuntu23) doesn't work. Cheers. Yusef Maali -- Kernel panic on install on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 54020] Re: Kernel panic on install on amd64

2008-11-11 Thread Yusef Maali
/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz) debian kernel works, ubuntu kernel don't. If you need more hardware informations I can take them from an x86 installation, because the x86_64 doesn't boot in any way. Thanks. Yusef Maali -- Kernel panic on install on amd64

[Bug 279186] Re: x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330 board D945GCLF2)

2008-11-11 Thread Yusef Maali
get only kernel panics. With x86 kernel I have no problem to install ubuntu and also boot a live cd. If it can be useful, the debian etch netboot install for x86_64 works perfectly (but it have a different kernel version). Thanks. Yusef Maali -- x86_64 kernel oops on boot (dual-core Atom 330

[Bug 54020] Re: Kernel panic on install on amd64

2008-11-13 Thread Yusef Maali
Please have a look also at bug #279186. It seems to be more specific to Intel D945GCLF(2). -- Kernel panic on install on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-06 Thread Yusef Maali
All the workarounds proposed here haven't worked for me. I have had to revert to the nv driver to have a usable system. I tried to downgrade xorg and the binary driver but my system still freeze. I tried (with the current xorg) all the binaries driver from nvidia (270, 275 and the beta 280) and

[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-06 Thread Yusef Maali
@Vlada: yes, I have tried both. I have tried the binary directly from nvidia site, not from the repository. Check here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=122606 I was not able to use the nouveau driver due to some kind of libdrm incompatibility... -- You received this bug

[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-06 Thread Yusef Maali
@vlado: I've tried all the binaries available in the repositories, then I've started to try all the binaries from official nvidia releases (the lastest 270, 275 and 280). None of them works. My issue is not strictly related to konsole. The system freezes whenever I have lot of GPU intensive

[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

2011-07-07 Thread Yusef Maali
@Christopher Yes, I have other problems for sure... :( Disabling desktop effect does not solve the problem, I have already tried. I have a Windows installation, but it is inside VirtualBox. I don't have any OS other than Linux. This situation started with a dist-upgrade of a few days ago. As far

[Bug 661654] Re: pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors

2010-10-19 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Steve, if this behavior is by design, I will anyway suggest to log the error somewhere (syslog?). I have had lost a lot of time figuring out what the matter was. If pam_motd had has logged the error, I would have solved the issue in a fraction of time. Dustin, it isn't cpu-checks related.

[Bug 661654] [NEW] pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors

2010-10-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-modules ** Problem: pam_motd module creates the file /var/run/motd.new but doesn't rename it into /var/run/motd. The /etc/motd symlink points to /var/run/motd and at each user login are shown old informations. ** Repeatable: Yes, always ** How

[Bug 661654] Re: pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors

2010-10-16 Thread Yusef Maali
** Patch added: pam_motd.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661654/+attachment/1696218/+files/pam_motd.patch -- pam_motd doesn't rename /var/run/motd.new if run-parts exits with errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 399071] Re: pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities

2010-10-16 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Dustin, I'm sorry for having written in the wrong place. I have filed the bug right now (#661654) Thanks, Yusef -- pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 518122] Re: Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick

2010-07-08 Thread Yusef Maali
I can't recompile the package so I used the one provided by Marco Cimmino (post #8). It works correctly and it has solved my issue. Just a question for Marco: in your package you have applied the patch in post #6? -- Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick

[Bug 495694] Re: kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

2010-07-08 Thread Yusef Maali
Same issue. Ubuntu Server, Lucid. Hw: Intel Atom D945GCLF. I haven't powernowd installed. This problem is come after upgrading from 9.10 to 10.04. Before that, I have never seen kacpid work in a such way. ** Tags added: lucid server -- kacpid uses 100% of CPU. Kernel is 2.6.31-17

[Bug 303068] Re: Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
I have done some test with Kubuntu 9.10 x86_64 / 10.04 x86 / 10.04 x86_64 inside a VirtualBox environment. The bug is 100% reproducible. Reading your last message, I have noticed that in Kubuntu there isn't a way to edit the Auto Eth0 connection (as you do). It is shown by knetworkmanager

[Bug 591024] [NEW] Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
Public bug reported: I have noticed that in Kubuntu/Kde is not possible to edit the Auto eth0 connection and, more important, is not possible to de-select its Connect automatically item. If I create a custom connection, ie for a static ip configuration, even if I select the Connect

[Bug 591024] Re: Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
** Attachment added: auto-eth0-missing.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49853610/auto-eth0-missing.png -- Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 303068] Re: Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
I have filed a new bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024 -- Static IP ethernet network setting is lost after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 5364] Re: Can't use static ip address with network-manager (and thus no VPN connections menu for static users)

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
Speaking about Kubuntu and not Ubuntu, I noticed the the Auto Eth0 and its Connect automatically flag is not editable. This makes impossible to create a custom connection (ie for static ip). At each startup the Auto Eth0 takes priority over all other connections. I have filed a bug report about

[Bug 280762] Re: knetworkmanager under kde4 doesn't recognize the static IP connections that I have configured.

2010-06-07 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Jonathan, I have not understand if knetworkmanger is no longer supported and if it is removed from Kubuntu 9.10 and 10.04. Seems from your words that it is replaced by the plasma-widget-networkmanagement as default option. But if you install a fresh 9.10/10.04 Kubuntu (or update to them) you

[Bug 399071] Re: pam_motd: assume update-motd responsibilities

2010-10-12 Thread Yusef Maali
Hello, upgrading from lucid to maverik (server edition), for some reason, the package update-notifier-common was removed. As main effect I have pam_motd to not refresh the /var/run/motd file. Looking into the code (mainly the Steve's patch revision) I found the problem. As Steve said: I've

[Bug 591024] Re: Can't edit Auto eth0 connection makes impossible to use static Ip / custom connections in Kubuntu/Kde

2010-12-19 Thread Yusef Maali
Hi Fabio, I'm wondering why you have marked as invalid this bug. It is still present in Kubuntu 10.10... Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591024 Title: Can't edit Auto eth0

[Bug 1731646] Re: missing qDebug output when creating QT applications

2018-01-27 Thread Yusef Maali
I upgraded from 17.04 to 17.10 just yesterday and I was affected from the same issue. I'm sorry to say, @mitya57, you intentionally broke the qDebug _default_ behaviour (and Fedora as well). qDebug()'ing something should result in printing in the console output. If there's issues with some