Logen Rosen,
I have kind-of hijacked your bug report here, and my changes go far
beyond fixing just what is reported in this bug description; do you mind
if I update the bug subject and description to reflect the more
widespread changes in my current merge request?
--
You received this bug notif
@dbrung can you please review/merge this when you have a chance.
I checked with flake8 and pylint, and fixed the couple flake8 errors.
pylint shows quite a few 'errors' but most are with the existing ubuntu-
dev-tools codebase, not my additions; such as 'missing-docstring' which
I considered harml
@mapreri, just checking if you have had any time for any review of this
yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary becaus
> But it's not a quick thing, I need to find some appropriate time to
review.
absolutely, I'm hoping it can get merged by b release next year, but
it's obviously not critical.
> BTW, even after merging some thing I'd prefer if you could stick around and
> deal with
> upcoming bugs in pull-pkg in
Most probably I can, yes. But it's not a quick thing, I need to find
some appropriate time to review.
BTW, even after merging some thing I'd prefer if you could stick around
and deal with upcoming bugs in pull-pkg in the next months.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
@mapreri you've uploaded several of the most recent ubuntu-dev-tools
changes, can you review this merge request?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source
Sponsors, @mterry, @laney, with 17.10 release behind us, does anyone
have time to review this merge request?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not
After quite a bit of patch editing and git rebasing of my working repo, I've
re-opened the merge request. Any coredevs who are interested please review the
patches if you have time:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/322863
** Merge proposal linke
Also, I have pkgs built for xenial/yakkety/zesty with the latest merge proposal
code, in this ppa:
https://launchpad.net/~ddstreet/+archive/ubuntu/lp1453330
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Ok, I updated my merge request to a git-based merge request:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/322863
also, I consolidated the script naming; so it's now:
pull-lp-source
pull-lp-debs
pull-lp-ddebs
pull-lp-udebs
which I think is more obvious, as to
After quite a bit of major updating, I have some test pkgs built here:
https://launchpad.net/~ddstreet/+archive/ubuntu/lp1453330/+packages
it moves pull-lp-source to 'pull-pkg'; that is able to pull from debian,
ubuntu, or uca, and it can pull source, binaries, ddebs, or di files.
It can also simp
Yep, I just changed it to work-in-progress, until i finish updating it
so pull-debian-* works also.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting s
The linked MP is marked as merged, but I don't think it is, looking at
trunk. Dan, can you get your MP sorted and reviewable, and then
subscribe sponsors again?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
I can confirm: the patch by Dan is woking!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
dead
To manage notific
Ok, but you should look at the thing that I created and compare it to
today's pull-lp-source. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting sour
Iain, you created pull-lp-source, can you review this merge request?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
dead
To manage notifications about t
> Dmitry, as you're following this bug and you have devel access to
merge it, can you review/merge the change?
Sorry, I do not know the code much, so I would prefer someone else to
review it. There are some other people with rights to merge subscribed
here :)
--
You received this bug notificatio
Dmitry, as you're following this bug and you have devel access to merge
it, can you review/merge the change?
** Tags added: sts-sponsor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
Merge proposal created:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools/lp1453330/+merge/319865
** Branch linked: lp:~ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools/lp1453330
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Dan, is that branch working? If so, can you please propose it for
merging?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because
Is this going to land for zesty or not?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
dead
To manage notificati
https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/ubuntu-dev-tools/lp1453330
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
de
Please fix it for zesty. It is preventing users from submitting patches
for zesty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE
The attachment "lp1453330-zesty.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The
ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they
can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a
patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, an
debdiff containing patch to zesty pull-lp-source. This applies to T/X/Y
pull-lp-source also.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #854010
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854010
** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
This bug is still relevant for binary->source mapping.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453330
Title:
pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is
dead
To ma
Now that bug 1508948 is fixed, pull-debian-source seems to be working
again on Ubuntu Xenial. As said, that adresses the rmadison failure, so
I don't know whether this bug should be left open or what happens to it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** Description changed:
Errors like the following are happening because Debian's DDE [1] is dead
[2]:
logan@logan-VMware:~$ pull-debian-source d-rats
pull-debian-source: Error: Unable to retrieve package information from DDE:
http://dde.debian.net/dde/q/udd/dist/d:debian/r:sid/p:d-rats
in wily, pull-lp-source works for me, but a simple 'pull-debian-source hello'
would fail.
The change in behavior from the working vivid for my specific use case is that
rmadison has changed and is hitting a different server.
on wily:
$ rmadison -u debian -s sid -a source hello
hello | 2.10-
Any news or should someone else pick this up?
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
You can get it from LP following a recent API extension. Something like
this:
try:
bpph = archive.getBinaryPackage(package, release, pocket)
except PackageNotFoundException, e:
Logger.error(str(e))
sys.exit(1)
spp
An alternative is to query the UDD public mirror [1] directly using
Psycopg, but I'm not sure if this is ideal (it also would add another
dependency/recommendation to ubuntu-dev-tools). Thoughts?
[1] http://public-udd-mirror.xvm.mit.edu/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Summary changed:
- pull-debian-source not getting source for binary because DDE is dead
+ pull-{lp,debian}-source not getting source for binary because DDE is dead
** Description changed:
Errors like the following are happening because Debian's DDE [1] is dead
[2]:
logan@logan-VMware
35 matches
Mail list logo
