[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-10-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package logwatch - 7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1 --- logwatch (7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1) xenial; urgency=medium [ Bryce Harrington ] * d/p/0020-dhcpd-Ignore-lease-age-under-threshold-messages.patch: dhcpd: Ignore lease age under threshold messages (LP: #1578001)

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-10-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package logwatch - 7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2 --- logwatch (7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2) bionic; urgency=medium [ Bryce Harrington ] * d/p/0020-dhcpd-Ignore-lease-age-under-threshold-messages.patch: dhcpd: Ignore lease age under threshold messages

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package logwatch - 7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1 --- logwatch (7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1) focal; urgency=medium [ Bryce Harrington ] * d/p/0020-dhcpd-Ignore-lease-age-under-threshold-messages.patch: dhcpd: Ignore lease age under threshold messages (LP: #1578001) *

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-29 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-focal verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-29 Thread Bryce Harrington
Verified in LXC on xenial, bionic, and focal per the test case, that the messages are no longer under "Unmatched" but are still mentioned as matched entries. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-15 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Jared, or anyone else affected, Accepted logwatch into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/7.4.2-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-15 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Jared, or anyone else affected, Accepted logwatch into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/7.4.3+git20161207-2ubuntu1.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-15 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Jared, or anyone else affected, Accepted logwatch into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/7.5.2-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce) ** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce) ** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Bryce Harrington (bryce) **

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+git/logwatch/+merge/390212 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+git/logwatch/+merge/390213 ** Merge proposal linked:

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed: [Impact] Various AppArmor messages aren't handled by logwatch, and thus end up in the "Unmatched Entries" section. Some of these are noteworthy, others are innocuous, but given the quantity and variety of them, they can clutter the log. Common ones should be

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed: [Impact] - Various AppArmor messages aren't handled by logwatch, and thus end up in the "Unmatched Entries" section. Some of these are noteworthy, others are innocuous, but given the quantity and variety of them, they can clutter the log. Common ones should be either

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed: - Under the "Kernel Audit" heading, the following apparmor lines appear as - unmatched: + [Impact] + Various AppArmor messages aren't handled by logwatch, and thus end up in the "Unmatched Entries" section. Some of these are noteworthy, others are innocuous, but given

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Attachment added: "Sample log entries for testing the apparmor="DENIED" error messages" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1577948/+attachment/5407059/+files/unmatched-entries-apparmor-lxd%3Akern.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Attachment added: "Sample log entries for testing the profile="unconfirmed" issue." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/1577948/+attachment/5407058/+files/unmatched-entries-apparmor%3Akern.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package logwatch - 7.5.4-0ubuntu2 --- logwatch (7.5.4-0ubuntu2) groovy; urgency=medium [ Bryce Harrington ] * d/p/0020-dhcpd-Ignore-lease-age-under-threshold-messages.patch: dhcpd: Ignore lease age under threshold messages (LP: #1578001) *

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+git/logwatch/+merge/389633 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577948 Title: unmatched entries

Re: [Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-20 Thread Seth Arnold
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:56:09PM -, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Thanks for the additional information. I've seen the snap profile_* > messages in my logwatch output as unmatched, but want to understand them > more before filtering them. > > As to the general unconfined entries, how can we

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-20 Thread Bryce Harrington
Thanks for the additional information. I've seen the snap profile_* messages in my logwatch output as unmatched, but want to understand them more before filtering them. As to the general unconfined entries, how can we best distinguish between the normal behavior and exception cases? -- You

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-20 Thread John Johansen
To add to Seth's answer. unconfined generally doesn't log, the exceptions are when an unconfined tasks makes policy changes, and when there is an internal error on profile attachment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-20 Thread Seth Arnold
The log message is reporting the profiles have been loaded. This is a standard part of booting a full system, starting services, and some service-specific operations (such as libvirt or snapd demand-loading profiles as VMs or snaps are used). There's other similar status messages:

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-08-19 Thread Bryce Harrington
The issue here is that logwatch does match apparmor STATUS messages generally, but not when they have profile="unconfined" between operation and name. I didn't find authoritative documentation on what this log entry means, but the answer to the following askubuntu post suggests this may be

[Bug 1577948] Re: unmatched entries for apparmor STATUS messages

2020-06-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
Yes, on focal I see the same. Since it's kernel, won't see these in an lxc container, but on bare metal or maybe a vm they add lots of noise. For Logwatch's purposes, all the apparmor="STATUS" messages should be filtered, as they're just informative. (I suspect many of the apparmor="DENIED"