Apologies again, I didn't get to this before trusty entered ESM mode
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Apologies again, I didn't get to this before trusty entered ESM mode
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
I didn't get a chance to look at this yet, sorry, because I'm not
familiar with ctdb.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version
I didn't get a chance to look at this yet, sorry, because I'm not
familiar with ctdb.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version
@Andreas
Any action on this being in our backlog? It got the 180 day ping today.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version 2:4.3.9+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3 is
Leaving ubuntu-server subscribed so it stays in the queue
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => Medium
** Tags removed: server-next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Leaving ubuntu-server subscribed so it stays in the queue
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => Medium
** Tags removed: server-next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I upgraded to xenial and clustering = yes seems to work fine now as does
ctdb. But I did get another error when running:
# ctdb scriptstatus all
Output was an error at the bottom referencing the "interface" script:
function gensub never defined
Installing the "gawk" package seemed to fix it.
I ran 'apt-get source samba' on both trusty and xenial. debian/rules
has different cluster options.
Current xenial source (4.3.11+dfsg) has a bunch of references to ctdb
and conf_args uses both config parameters:
--builtin-libraries=replace,ccan,samba-cluster-support
--with-cluster-support
I made some tests today and confirmed the issue still exists with the
latest published Samba package on Trusty: 2:4.3.11+dfsg-
0ubuntu0.14.04.13.
But the issue does not exists on Xenial. CTDB is working fine here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
trusty releases:
2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2: nothing about "cluster" in debian/rules.
--with-cluster-support has a default of "auto" according to ./configure --help
2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.11: debian/rules has:
--builtin-libraries=replace,ccan,samba-cluster-support
--with-cluster-support
trusty releases:
2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2: nothing about "cluster" in debian/rules.
--with-cluster-support has a default of "auto" according to ./configure --help
2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.11: debian/rules has:
--builtin-libraries=replace,ccan,samba-cluster-support
--with-cluster-support
I'll grab this and determine if it's a regression.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Andreas Hasenack
(ahasenack)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
I'll grab this and determine if it's a regression.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Andreas Hasenack
(ahasenack)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Andreas,
this is on our expiry check for server-next bugs today.
You worked on so many smb issues that I lost the overview - are there any
updates on this one as well to either work on it again or to drop server-next
for a reason?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I can see evidence that clustering is not enabled in the update, but I
cannot see that evidence in the original trusty version. The smbd -b
output in that older samba version doesn't mention clustering
capabilities.
If I use these ./configure options to 4.3.1:
> If I use these ./configure options to 4.3.1:
I meant 4.3.11, sorry.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version
> If I use these ./configure options to 4.3.1:
I meant 4.3.11, sorry.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version 2:4.3.9+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3 is not
I can see evidence that clustering is not enabled in the update, but I
cannot see that evidence in the original trusty version. The smbd -b
output in that older samba version doesn't mention clustering
capabilities.
If I use these ./configure options to 4.3.1:
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version 2:4.3.9+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3 is not compile
I did a diff between the source of the two versions and noticed this
suspicious change in debian/rules:
4.1.6:
--builtin-libraries=replace,ccan
4.3.9:
--builtin-libraries=replace,ccan,samba-cluster-support
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Something definitely happened between versions. I'm working on a SAN
cluster (glusterfs+ctdb+samba) and have two identical nodes, I
downgraded one.
=== SAN1
root@san1:~# dpkg -l | grep samba
ii python-samba2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2amd64
I performed the same CTDB tests with both versions of Samba:
2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 and 2:4.3.9+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.
CTDB was working with 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 but not with
2:4.3.9+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3.
No third-party samba package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
samba 2:4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 in trusty isn't built with ctdb support. Are
you sure you weren't using a third-party samba package?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
The build log for 4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2 doesn't seem to indicate it being
built with ctdb support.
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/171743930/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-
amd64.samba_2%3A4.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2_UPLOADING.txt.gz
Checking for header ctdb.h
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597858
Title:
Samba package version 2:4.3.9+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3 is not compile
with CTDB support
To manage
27 matches
Mail list logo
