[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Mathew Hodson]

** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #804684
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804684

** Summary changed:

- [MIR] fonts-android
+ libgs9-common recommends fonts-droid-fallback which isn't in main

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  libgs9-common recommends fonts-droid-fallback, which isn't in main

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Michael Terry]

So we don't need this?  Will mark invalid.

** Changed in: fonts-android (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Till Kamppeter]

Uploaded. Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/libgs9-common

I attached a patch for changing it, and after a test build I could do:

$ dpkg -I libgs9-common_9.19~dfsg+1-0ubuntu3_all.deb | grep Recommends
 Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk

** Also affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Patch added: "ghostscript_fonts-noto-cjk.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1621210/+attachment/4741307/+files/ghostscript_fonts-noto-cjk.patch

** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Till Kamppeter]

I do not find any Ghostscript with a depends/recommends/suggests on
fonts-noto-cjk. Can someone tell me which Ghostscript version? Or can
someone post a patch to switch Ghostscript to fonts-noto-cjk?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Till Kamppeter]

This was simply an oversight when I tried minimize the delta between
Debian and Ubuntu, letting the new Ghostscript package be based on
Debian's with the only difference that the libopenjpeg shipped with
Ghostscript is used and not the system's one.

I can simply reapply the change to get it recommending fonts-noto-cjk,
giving us the quality advantage.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Michael Terry]

Yeah, I thought noto was the replacement.  Unless there's a good reason
android is needed, I'd prefer we standardize.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

[Gunnar Hjalmarsson]

I suppose this is due to . In Ubuntu
(and flavors) previous fonts-droid depends/recommends were replaced with
fonts-noto-cjk in Xenial; please see
.

Wondering if it would be better in Ubuntu to change that libgs9-common
recommend to fonts-noto-cjk instead. (Maybe also in Debian.)

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #804684
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804684

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210

Title:
  [MIR] fonts-android

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-android/+bug/1621210/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs