** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236
Title:
[SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
To manage notifications
This bug was fixed in the package snapd - 2.16+16.10ubuntu1.2
---
snapd (2.16+16.10ubuntu1.2) yakkety; urgency=medium
* debian/control:
- also add a dependency to "snap-confine" to unbreak armhf
(LP: #1634236)
-- Michael Vogt Tue, 18 Oct 2016 20:29:56
+0200
** Chang
This bug was fixed in the package snapd - 2.16ubuntu3
---
snapd (2.16ubuntu3) xenial; urgency=medium
* debian/control:
- also add a dependency to "snap-confine" to unbreak armhf
(LP: #1634236)
snapd (2.16ubuntu2) xenial; urgency=medium
* fix FTBFS on powerpc by ensurin
Verified pass, the new snapd (2.16ubuntu3) depends on the right version of
snap-confine (>= 1.0.43).
Thanks
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Hello Michael,
The new snapd in proposed updates the dependency of ubuntu-core-launcher, but
not snap-confine,
I just upgraded snapd, but the snap-confine is still the old version
(1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.4),
only ubuntu-core-launcher is upgraded to the latest one
(1.0.43-0ubuntu1~16.04.1),
coul
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted snapd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.16ubuntu1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted snapd into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.16+16.10ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236
Title:
[SRU
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236
Title:
can you provide an ETA for when this will be pushed as a proposed SRU?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236
Title:
[SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
To manage notifications
** Description changed:
Trivial SRU of snapd that adds a missing versioned dependency for snap-
confine to snapd.
+
+ It turns out there is a regression because of this if:
+ - you use an armhf architecture
+ - snapd 2.16
+ - snap-confine < 1.0.43
+
+ The reason is that with snapd 2.16 we us
** Summary changed:
- [SRU] 2.16.1
+ [SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634236
Title:
[SRU] Dependency on snap-confine too weak
To manage noti
12 matches
Mail list logo
