** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture
** Tags added: bugnameltc-156939 severity-medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
To manage
slof (20170724+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot for the QEMU 2.10.x releases (closes: #871259).
* Fix Vcs-Browser field.
* Switch the priority to optional as the priority extra has been removed
starting with policy 4.0.1.
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.0.1 (no
** Tags removed: bugnameltc-156939 severity-medium triage-a
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
To
Ok, migrations through the upgrades worked as well.
So tested and by that issuing the sync of the newer version as in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF
Local boot was fine with the new slof.
But since there could be issues when migrating from old-slof to
system-with-new-slof I'm currently testing this as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Yeah I saw the update, and I had an 20170724+dfsg-0ubuntu1 ready but I did just
the same he did.
So I appreciate his upload and prefer making it a sync.
I'll make a ppa ready with the sync instead of my mereg and I'll try to catch
you today what you have in mind about a test to do the right
** Changed in: slof (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
To
I spoke to Aurelien (the Debian maintainer) and he did the update in
Debian today. I'd still like to give this a test drive before approving
the FFe, but given the recommendation to keep qemu and slof in sync, I'm
tentatively on board with this.
If we do go ahead, please either sync Aurelien's
** Tags removed: triage-g
** Tags added: triage-a
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
To manage
** Tags removed: triage-r
** Tags added: triage-g
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1706248
Title:
[FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
To manage
FFE ready with all info in the Description.
Subscribed the Release Team, once I get an Ack I can upload.
** Description changed:
+ [FFE]
+
+ Debian didn't move at all yet, so I wanted to request an FFE for Artful
+ on this.
+
+ This will fix the bug here but many more (see git log of slof).
+
** Summary changed:
- SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
+ [FFE] SLOF dhcp request doesn't include client architecture code 93
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
13 matches
Mail list logo
