[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2019-02-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mranw...@us.ibm.com 2019-02-20 19:22 EDT--- I will close this bug - the utility won't be needed now. If it's needed in the future we'll still need to address the IBM EULA issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-11 18:30 EDT--- -Replacing the current EULA handling with a EULA prompt before install sounds great. -The thought of a developer removing a EULA prompt from a package sounds very strange. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-11 15:28 EDT--- We agree that multiverse works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716924 Title: [needs-packaging] [Ubuntu 18.04

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-10 12:06 EDT--- The license agreement is used when a customer has purchased and installed our adapter card, to detail a liability and support agreement with IBM. The customer runs a configuration script after installing our adapter card, and

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-06 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-06 11:54 EDT--- you are correct, cxl_flash_vm does not belong. I removed the file, pushed that commit to github, and re-released 5.0.2669. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-04-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-04-05 11:26 EDT--- I published a new release which removed the debian files, and has a couple of minor fixes. https://github.com/open-power/capiflash/releases/tag/5.0.2669 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-30 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-30 11:14 EDT--- https://github.com/open-power/capiflash/releases 5.0.2663 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716924 Title:

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-29 17:56 EDT--- I pushed the 5.0.2663 level to github with the libcxlflash chgs. Pls review for 18.04 inclusion. thx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-28 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-28 18:08 EDT--- 5.0.* is the latest dev, and it needs to be in 18.04. That update comes when I push these packaging changes, very soon. I have the new packaging working, and it built in my PPA. We want to name the packages:

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-27 18:41 EDT--- I couldn't get the 18.04 debuild to run, it doesn't do the compile: > fakeroot debian/rules build dh build --with=systemd > echo $? 0 *any idea? can you try it on 18.04? It ran on 16.04, with warnings: . dh_gencontrol

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-27 11:22 EDT--- The cxlflash-test and cxlflashimage packages contain binary files which are not open-source, and therefore won't be included in a linux distro. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-26 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-26 11:24 EDT--- We appreciate the effort, but changing the package names wont work for us. It would require existing customers to make changes for dependencies based on the new package names. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-23 15:07 EDT--- Since we have current customers with dependencies upon our existing package name and version, we do not like that solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-20 16:15 EDT--- I think you are talking about managing the library version dependencies with the library package version. Yes, external developers may use dynamic linking to our shared libraries and create their own packages. Those developers

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mpvag...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-20 14:04 EDT--- The consumers of the shared libraries are those who purchase a compatible IBM Adapter card on an IBM POWER system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-03-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From drbr...@us.ibm.com 2018-03-07 10:30 EDT--- I can't tell what the next step is here. What is still needed/outstanding. This is a request for 18.04 only at this point, not 17.10. Please update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2018-02-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bar...@us.ibm.com 2018-02-14 14:18 EDT--- *** Bug 143338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716924 Title:

[Bug 1716924] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2017-09-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From rosat...@br.ibm.com 2017-09-18 15:22 EDT--- Hi, Some of the things commented on mentors.debian were already fixed before, but it seems that you've got the wrong release, which you pointed as an issue in the mentors comment. We fixed this issue as well as the ones