[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Override component to main libblockdev 2.16-2 in bionic: universe/misc -> main gir1.2-blockdev-2.0 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main gir1.2-blockdev-2.0 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main gir1.2-blockdev-2.0 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main gir1.2-blockdev-2.0 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main gir1.2-blockdev-2.0 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main gir1.2-blockdev-2.0 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/introspection/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs2 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs2 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs2 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs2 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs2 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-btrfs2 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto-dev 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto-dev 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto-dev 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto-dev 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto-dev 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto-dev 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto2 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto2 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto2 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto2 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto2 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-crypto2 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dev 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dev 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dev 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dev 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dev 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dev 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm-dev 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm-dev 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm-dev 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm-dev 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm-dev 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm-dev 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm2 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm2 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm2 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm2 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm2 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-dm2 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs-dev 2.16-2 in bionic s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs2 2.16-2 in bionic amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs2 2.16-2 in bionic arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs2 2.16-2 in bionic armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs2 2.16-2 in bionic i386: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs2 2.16-2 in bionic ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libblockdev-fs2 2.16-2 in bionic s390x:
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Ack on libblockdev, provided only the listed binaries are promoted. udisks2 also deals with crypto even though the libblockdev- packages are not installed; I do believe it should be reviewed as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Here are a list of libblockdev's binary packages that depend on universe packages that I think we don't need in main now. libblockdev-plugins-all libblockdev-btrfs2 libblockdev-btrfs-dev libblockdev-crypto2 libblockdev-crypto-dev libblockdev-kbd2 libblockdev-kbd-dev libblockdev-lvm2 libblockdev-lvm-dev libblockdev-mdraid2 libblockdev-mdraid-dev crypto requires volume-key (LP: #1754422) mdraid requires thin-provisioning-tools btrfs, kbd, and mdraid requires libbytesize I updated the supported seed so that these won't try to be automatically pulled in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Ubuntu Desktop bugs is the subscriber (although the Desktop Team thinks
that Foundations should be responsible for udisks and friends)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet. (I think the upstream test suite needs to be run as autopkgtests)
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe
libvolume-key1 (source: volume-key)
- It might be ok to temporarily not recommend that plugin until the MIR
- for volume-key is approved. (LP: #1754422)
+ It might be ok to temporarily not recommend that plugin until the MIR for
volume-key is approved. (LP: #1754422). (This was done in
+ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/2.7.6-2 )
Some of the other plugins depend on libbytesize, but we don't need those
plugins in main yet.
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
upstream:
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499
Title:
[MIR] libblockdev
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Ubuntu Desktop bugs is the subscriber (although the Desktop Team thinks
that Foundations should be responsible for udisks and friends)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet. (I think the upstream test suite needs to be run as autopkgtests)
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe
libvolume-key1 (source: volume-key)
- It might be ok to temporarily not recommend that plugin until a MIR for
- volume-key is filed and approved.
+ It might be ok to temporarily not recommend that plugin until the MIR
+ for volume-key is approved. (LP: #1754422)
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
upstream:
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Ubuntu Desktop bugs is the subscriber (although the Desktop Team thinks
that Foundations should be responsible for udisks and friends)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet. (I think the upstream test suite needs to be run as autopkgtests)
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe
libvolume-key1 (source: volume-key)
It might be ok to temporarily not recommend that plugin until the MIR
for volume-key is approved. (LP: #1754422)
+ Some of the other plugins depend on libbytesize, but we don't need those
+ plugins in main yet.
+
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
upstream:
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499
Title:
[MIR] libblockdev
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Ubuntu Desktop bugs is the subscriber (although the Desktop Team thinks
that Foundations should be responsible for udisks and friends)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet. (I think the upstream test suite needs to be run as autopkgtests)
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
- Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-plugins-all which depends on these
binary packages:
- - libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe libvolume-key1 (source:
volume-key)
- - libblockdev-btrfs2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- - libblockdev-kbd2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- - libblockdev-mdraid2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
+ Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe
libvolume-key1 (source: volume-key)
- libbytesize is another storaged project. Neither libbytesize nor volume-
- key have any other universe binary dependencies. It might be ok to
- temporarily not recommend those udisks2 plugins until the other 2 MIRs
- are processed.
+ It might be ok to temporarily not recommend that plugin until a MIR for
+ volume-key is filed and approved.
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
upstream:
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499
Title:
[MIR] libblockdev
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
I reviewed libblockdev version 2.16-2 as checked into bionic. This should not be considered a full security audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. - libblockdev is a plugin-based library to work with block devices, providing an API based interface that knows how to either perform underlying operations directly or call the necessary command line applications as appropriate. - There are no CVEs in our database - Build-Depends: debhelper, libtool, dh-python, python3:any, libglib2.0-dev libgirepository1.0-dev, libcryptsetup-dev libdevmapper-dev libudev-dev libsystemd-dev, libdmraid-dev, libvolume-key-dev, libbytesize-dev, libnss3-dev libparted-dev libmount-dev libblkid-dev libpython3-dev, libkmod-dev gtk-doc-tools, gobject-introspection, pylint - libblockdev does not itself daemonize - no networking - automatically generated pre/post inst/rm scripts - no initscripts - no dbus services - no setuid files - no executables in PATH - no sudo fragments - no udev rules - There is a test suite; it is not run during the build. I suspect keeping this test suite disabled is the right approach. - No cronjobs - Noisy build logs, primarily from the documentation tools; not ideal, but at least not much from the code itself - Several plugins execute helper tools; the glib helpers make the resulting code fairly complex, but it looks like the executions were carefully written - memory management is careful; allocated memory is quickly freed when it is no longer used to simplify error handling - normally 'files' being opened are block devices - Logging functions looked careful - No environment variable use - Does not itself do cryptography -- drives LUKS, VeraCrypt, etc via helpers - Does not do networking - Does not use temporary files - Does not use WebKit - Does not use PolicyKit - Does not use JavaScript - Mostly clean cppcheck results; s390 code has legitimate errors: [src/plugins/s390.c:293]: (error) Used file that is not opened. [src/plugins/s390.c:293]: (error) Resource handle 'fd' freed twice. [src/plugins/s390.c:968]: (error) Resource leak: fd The s390 code does not feel as mature as the rest of the code base. I suspect a deeper inspection of the s390 sources would find more issues. If it can be disabled without significant loss of functionality then I recommend we disable it. Security team ACK for promoting libblockdev to main. Here's some notes I took while reviewing the code, in the hopes that they are useful: - bd_s390_dasd_online() double-closes fd, uses fd when it isn't open - bd_s390_zfcp_offline() leaks fd in rc == EOF branch - bd_s390_zfcp_online() calls fclose(fd) in a branch when fd is known to be NULL - bd_s390_zfcp_scsi_offline() does not check fopen(hba_path, "r") for an error return - bd_s390_zfcp_scsi_offline() does not check fopen(wwpn_path, "r") for an error return - bd_s390_zfcp_scsi_offline() does not check fopen(lun_path, "r") for an error return - bd_crypto_tc_open(), luks_format(), (and other functions) do not zero out secrets such as passwords. (This is difficult to do; the goal is not to be perfect, but to try. Simply adding memset_s() calls would be a step in the right direction.) - Many routines in src/plugins/crypto.c call strlen(passwd), some other functions are described as taking binary data in password parameters. Is there a chance of one interface setting, changing, or removing a password, that other interfaces cannot work with? - write_escrow_data_file() writes what looks like a secret key equivalent to a file but does not itself set a safe umask before doing so. Thanks ** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Dimitri, Michael Biebl would rather not build the s390 plugin in Debian. He pointed to this comment which says that it's currently not used by udisks but only by Fedora/Red Hat-specific utilities. https://github.com/storaged- project/libblockdev/pull/275#issuecomment-328516293 ** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
symbols have been added in 2.16-1 which should auto-sync to bionic- proposed soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
@jbicha That include is deprecated, and this got fixed in 2.14, see NEWS entry - Do not include s390utils/vtoc.h in s390 plugin See how it builds fine in e.g.: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/357610446/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-s390x.libblockdev_2.14-3ubuntu1+ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz dh_missing --fail-missing dh_missing: usr/lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libbd_s390.so.2.0.0 exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere dh_missing: usr/lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libbd_s390.so.2 exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere dh_missing: usr/lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libbd_s390.so exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere dh_missing: usr/include/blockdev/s390.h exists in debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere dh_missing: missing files, aborting Built correctly, just needs shipping in a package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Dimitri, we tried to get the s390 plugin to work but it caused the package to FTBFS on s390x. If you want it, you're welcome to fix the issue. See for instance https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/2.12-3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Imho, s390 plugin should be built. It should not bring any more additional runtime dependencies, but without it, none of the s390 hard drives could be operated on with this package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
also please add symbols files for the library files ** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) ** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Security review team is not subscribed if it needs so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
Ubuntu Desktop Bugs is subscribed now although the Desktop Team thinks
that Foundations should be responsible for udisks-related packages.
python-blockdev issue fixed by dropping that unused Python2 package.
libblockdev is built the same across architectures. Upstream offers an
extra s390 plugin that didn't work correctly and that has been disabled.
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- - Needs a bug subscriber: Ubuntu Foundations? Ubuntu Desktop?
+ - Ubuntu Desktop bugs is the subscriber (although the Desktop Team thinks
that Foundations should be responsible for udisks and friends)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet. (I think the upstream test suite needs to be run as autopkgtests)
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-plugins-all which depends on these
binary packages:
- libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe libvolume-key1 (source:
volume-key)
- libblockdev-btrfs2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-kbd2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-mdraid2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
libbytesize is another storaged project. Neither libbytesize nor volume-
key have any other universe binary dependencies. It might be ok to
temporarily not recommend those udisks2 plugins until the other 2 MIRs
are processed.
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
upstream:
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499
Title:
[MIR] libblockdev
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
- missing bug subscriber
- why don't we build the plugin on s390x? The Debian comment is
terse, and we should not diverge a library package across
architectures.
- warning: Depends field of package python-blockdev: unknown \
substitution variable ${python2:Depends}
That one doesn't exist, leaving the package without dependencies.
- the package maybe should get a security review.
** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499
Title:
[MIR] libblockdev
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Needs a bug subscriber: Ubuntu Foundations? Ubuntu Desktop?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet.
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-plugins-all which depends on these
binary packages:
- libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe libvolume-key1 (source:
volume-key)
- libblockdev-btrfs2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-kbd2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-mdraid2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
libbytesize is another storaged project. Neither libbytesize nor volume-
key have any other universe binary dependencies. It might be ok to
temporarily not recommend those udisks2 plugins until the other 2 MIRs
are processed.
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
- Maintained by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused on
cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
+ Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
+
+ upstream:
+ https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Needs a bug subscriber: Ubuntu Foundations? Ubuntu Desktop?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
- dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet.
+ dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet. (I think the upstream test suite needs to be run as autopkgtests)
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-plugins-all which depends on these
binary packages:
- libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe libvolume-key1 (source:
volume-key)
- libblockdev-btrfs2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-kbd2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-mdraid2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
libbytesize is another storaged project. Neither libbytesize nor volume-
key have any other universe binary dependencies. It might be ok to
temporarily not recommend those udisks2 plugins until the other 2 MIRs
are processed.
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained in Debian by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused
on cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
upstream:
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev
--
You received this bug notifi
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Also affects: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: bionic upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499 Title: [MIR] libblockdev To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1735499] Re: [MIR] libblockdev
** Description changed:
Availability
Built for all supported architectures. In sync with Debian.
Rationale
=
udisks2 2.7 uses the "libblockdev library for all low level storage
management tasks instead of calling command line tools." libblockdev appears to
have the same maintainers ("storaged project") as udisks2.
It would be nice to have the new version to support GNOME Disks 3.26's new
Resize and Repair features.
http://pothos.blogsport.eu/2017/08/22/last-project-phase-and-3-26-features/
There is some interest in dropping Gparted from the Ubuntu live ISO
since it does not support Wayland and it still uses gtk2.
Security
No known security issues
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libblockdev
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+cve
Quality assurance
=
- Needs a bug subscriber: Ubuntu Foundations? Ubuntu Desktop?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libblockdev
https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/issues
dh_auto_test is run but I guess it's not actually running the upstream test
suite yet.
See http://storaged.org/libblockdev/ch03.html
No autopkgtests
Dependencies
Debian's udisks2 recommends libblockdev-plugins-all which depends on these
binary packages:
- libblockdev-crypto2 which depends on the universe libvolume-key1 (source:
volume-key)
- libblockdev-btrfs2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-kbd2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
- libblockdev-mdraid2 which depends on the universe libbytesize1 (source:
libbytesize)
+ libbytesize is another storaged project. Neither libbytesize nor volume-
+ key have any other universe binary dependencies. It might be ok to
+ temporarily not recommend those udisks2 plugins until the other 2 MIRs
+ are processed.
+
Standards compliance
4.1.1, debhelper compat 10, simple dh7 style rules
Maintenance
===
Maintained by the Debian Utopia team, which is a small team focused on
cross-desktop freedesktop.org stuff.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735499
Title:
[MIR] libblockdev
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libblockdev/+bug/1735499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
