** Description changed:
+
+ # Original summary: pulseaudio built with --enable-snappy but 'Enable
+ Snappy support: no'
+
+ # Original description
+
From https://launchpadlibrarian.net/377100864/buildlog_ubuntu-cosmic-
amd64.pulseaudio_1%3A12.0-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz:
...
This bug was fixed in the package pulseaudio - 1:12.2-0ubuntu2
---
pulseaudio (1:12.2-0ubuntu2) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Update snap policy to make access to audio recording conditional on
plugging the "pulseaudio" or "audio-record" interfaces (LP: #1781428):
-
The attachment "pulseaudio_12.2-0ubuntu1_12.2-0ubuntu2.diff" seems to be
a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug
report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If
the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment,
Attached is a debdiff for a 1:12.2-0ubuntu2 release of pulseaudio with
an updated snap policy module and the default configuration modified to
enable it.
I also took the opportunity to remove the Ubuntu Phone era trust-store
module, which hasn't been built since February.
** Patch added:
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jamesh/pulseaudio/+git/pulseaudio/+merge/352558
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => James Henstridge (jamesh)
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1781428
Title:
pulseaudio built with --enable-snappy but 'Enable Snappy support:
We can't just enable the patches any more because it will change how
snaps that plugs 'pulseaudio' will work. Put concretely, the patches are
meant to detect if the connecting process is a snap and if it is,
unconditionally deny recording. Some snaps that 'plugs: [ pulseaudio ]'
have legitimate
I'm not familiar with the workings of those patches - only basic fixes
to make them build OK.
Certainly "Enable Snappy support: no" looks like a bug worth fixing. But
I don't know who has the authority to decide about dropping any of those
patches.
Also how does this relate to Chromium?
**