[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2021-05-10 Thread Steve Beattie
Sorry for the lag on this issue. Timo, while the added hooks are useful, they don't for the time being obviate the need for the larger hammer of the sysctl, so we'd still like to keep the referred to patch available, until we are forced to make a choice if and when upstream drops the sysctl

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2021-05-10 Thread Kelsey Skunberg
** Tags added: 5.6 oem oem-5.6 sru-20210412 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879339 Title: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2020-06-22 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Hello Steve, test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict is still failing with F-OEM-5.6, do you want me to open a new bug for it? Thanks ** Tags added: sru-20200608 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2020-05-21 Thread Timo Aaltonen
does this upstream change replace the sauce patch? commit da97e18458fb42d7c00fac5fd1c56a3896ec666e Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) Date: Mon Oct 14 13:03:08 2019 -0400 perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks In current mainline, the degree of access to

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2020-05-21 Thread Steve Beattie
** Changed in: qa-regression-testing Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879339 Title: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict /

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2020-05-21 Thread Steve Beattie
The test_400_refcount_config failure has been addressed in qa-regression-testing commit https://git.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/commit/?id=480aaab47c0e7e11ab5bad5b56f61742ac8fdf9e Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2020-05-20 Thread Steve Beattie
For the test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict -- missing SECURITY_PERF_EVENTS_RESTRICT option; it appears the linux-oem-5.6 kernel is missing the following Ubuntu SAUCE patch: commit 4e6246de75c468397327fa741b380c926020c81f Author: Ben Hutchings Date: Tue Aug 16 10:27:00 2016

[Bug 1879339] Re: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict / test_400_refcount_config in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed on F-OEM-5.6

2020-05-19 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Package changed: linux-signed-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu) => linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879339 Title: test_310_config_security_perf_events_restrict /