[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-02-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-24 05:17 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released for all requested distros -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903682

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-01-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2021-01-29 05:42 EDT--- (In reply to comment #25) > This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the > problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the > problem is solved, change the tag

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 08:55 EDT--- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, that's a pity, because it means that a manual kernel SRU is needed now. > It's needed to make sure that someone who has the fix in focal and upgrades > to groovy will not run into a

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 06:51 EDT--- Ahh, got it 5.8 stable is already EOL according to https://www.kernel.org/ By the way, is the plan for 21.04 LTS still to go with v5.11, seeing as Greg announced that v5.10 will be the next long term stable kernel, picking

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 06:43 EDT--- (In reply to comment #16) > Hi Niklas, > I found the ticket upstream accepted with hash 0b2ca2c7d0c9 > and the provenance in 'git show 0b2ca2c7d0c9' mentions: > Cc: # 5.8 > So I'm expecting that in 5.8 (rather than in 5.9)

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-12-01 04:45 EDT--- @Frank Heinz-Werner said you had trouble finding the upstream stable commit for this. The original upstream commit is 0b2ca2c7d0c9e2731d01b6c862375d44a7e13923 s390/pci: fix hot-plug of PCI function missing bus This was

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-11 11:10 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) > I've build patches kernel packages and shared them here for further > reference and testing: > https://people.canonical.com/~fheimes/lp1903682/ I've just repeated the original test with this kernel

[Bug 1903682] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-11-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2020-11-10 07:36 EDT--- (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, I can see that the commit got accepted with 5.10-rc3, hence it will land > in hirsute. > And because the patch was tagged as stable for 5.8, it will land in groovy's > kernel 5.8 (I'll check the