[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-16 Thread Steve Langasek
Matthias has communicated out of band that the regressions were not due to new features in the upstream code, but due to a misconfiguration of the build. That has now been addressed, and with my release team hat I don't see any further cause for concern. The feature freeze is meant to ensure

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Sorry but no, the reason this bug was opened is that the upload is a feature freeze break, Steve you wrote yourself in comment #3 that it needed to be reviewed in that regard. The question on whether this upload deserves an exception hasn't been answered by the release team. And if the outcome is

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943288 Title: Soname change and transition started without a ffe To manage

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-16 Thread Steve Langasek
The glib-related regressions have been fixed in a subsequent upload and autopkgtests are now green. Closing this bug to unblock migration. ** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-16 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags removed: rls-ii-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943288 Title: Soname change and transition started without a ffe To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943288 Title:

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
not directly related but we should try to ensure that libffi updates exercise the tests from some of its rdepends as gjs, it's not working today since those depends on libglib and not directly on libffi which means the update could have migrated despite the issue if we hadn't be lucky -- You

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-14 Thread Sebastien Bacher
There are several desktop packages which started having red autopkgtests due to the update https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gtk+3.0 https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python-dbusmock https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/umockdev The i386 tests also showed problems but it

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Ok so it turns out I misread this: the upload to Debian was in June, but this was only synced to impish on Sep 10. And while it's not an soname transition in the usual sense, it is a new upstream version, which we have reports of regressing the desktop. Yes this needs to be reviewed with respect

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-13 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Alright, unsure why the transition hadn't been started between june and now, the timing is a bit unfortunate since it's blocking stack of packages in proposed before beta now but let's take that discussion elsewhere if that's not a release concern -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1943288] Re: Soname change and transition started without a ffe

2021-09-10 Thread Steve Langasek
I've reviewed the history here; libffi8 has been in impish-proposed since June 30. So this is not something that requires a freeze exception, just follow-through on the migration. ** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because