[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-11-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package marisa - 0.2.6-5ubuntu1 --- marisa (0.2.6-5ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium * Merge with Debian unstable, remaining changes: - g++-10 added to Build-Depends for ppc64el due to ruby2.7 FTBFS workaround for ppc64el. See lp bug 1943823. -

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-25 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
** Tags removed: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947790 Title: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-24 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
On 2021-10-24 07:31, Mitsuya Shibata wrote: > mkmf module in extconf.rb sets CC and some build related environment > variables. But this variables will not refer host system directly, > instead of this, mkmf refer to ruby embedded information. That is, > mkmf will set CC as same as compile to

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-23 Thread Mitsuya Shibata
@Gunnar, > I see that only installing g++-10 would have been sufficient. Yes, g++-10 on build-depends is only needed for the bug. The source package of marisa will generate some components, libmarisa, perl/python/ruby bindings. This gcc-10/gcc-11 problem only affects ruby bindings. Other

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-23 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
@Mitsuya: Hmm.. I didn't read your latest comment carefully enough. I changed debian/rules too, but now I see that only installing g++-10 would have been sufficient. Don't understand how, though. Isn't GCC 11 the default when both are present? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-23 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
You are right Mitsuya. I uploaded with that change. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/marisa/0.2.6-3ubuntu3 Thanks again! ** Changed in: marisa (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: marisa (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) --

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-23 Thread Mitsuya Shibata
Hi Gunnar, > The workaround for ruby was applied already in impish, but the marisa source which fails in jammy builds successfully in impish. I tried on impish, and it was FTBFS as same as jammy. The your build log of impish show following messages:

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-23 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Thanks for the tip! The workaround for ruby was applied already in impish, but the marisa source which fails in jammy builds successfully in impish. https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/marisa/+packages So that would indicate that marisa fails for some other reason. Did you possibly

[Bug 1947790] Re: marisa FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-10-23 Thread Mitsuya Shibata
It seems that ruby on ppc64el requires gcc-10 instead of system defaults gcc-11. ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.7/+bug/1943823 We should be add "g++-10 [ppc64el]," to Build-Depends in debian/control? --- In build system: root@nuc:/tmp/buildd/marisa-0.2.6/bindings/ruby#