[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-29 Thread Dan Streetman
> also backporting debugedit sounds like the correct thing to do I don't think we can backport debugedit for i386 currently, since debugedit's i386 build depends on debhelper which depends on debugedit's i386 build. Maybe we can do a build without the backports pocket in a PPA, then binary-copy

[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-23 Thread Matthias Klose
also backporting debugedit sounds like the correct thing to do -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building

[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-23 Thread Matthias Klose
> 1. revert Matthias' change from debhelper/13.3.4ubuntu1 (2021-03-19) > that make use of debugedit (honestly I don't even understand *why* > he did that) The file names in the dbgsym packages are based on a hash derived from the contents of the files. This leads to conflicting files for similar

[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-22 Thread Thomas Ward
archive admins dont think i386ing the RPM source is a good idea based on my brief discussiom in #ubuntu-release debugedit has splitsource in later versions, perhaps a split-source is needed here. However I would suggest we defer to archive admins for best approach here -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
So it would need 2 addition to the i386 whitelist. Feel free to bring an archive administrator in the loop, I think it's only them who have the power to do that (if we want to go through that route). Except that I just realized that rpm (and debugedit) in focal are in universe. So it would also

[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-22 Thread David Ward
I am able to build src:rpm for focal i386 using pbuilder, as long as p7zip-full:i386 is built first. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not

[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I think we have three choices here: 1. revert Matthias' change from debhelper/13.3.4ubuntu1 (2021-03-19) that make use of debugedit (honestly I don't even understand *why* he did that) 2. backport debugedit too (honestly I don't remember if that would be enough to make it build on i386,

[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-21 Thread David Ward
Root cause: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/p7zip/+bug/1965855 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800 Title: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package