[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2012-05-07 Thread Ward
I don't understand this sentence -- there seem to be something missing, either a word or a punctuation mark. Do you mean Don't you want to be better_,_ Debian?, Don't you want to be _a_ better Debian? or Don't you want to be better _than_ Debian?? Ah, insult upon injury. Much easier than

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2012-05-06 Thread Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
Don't you want to be better Debian? This is insane and drives most people crazy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 Title: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the

Re: [Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2012-05-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala wrote: Don't you want to be better Debian? I don't understand this sentence -- there seem to be something missing, either a word or a punctuation mark. Do you mean Don't you want to be better_,_ Debian?, Don't you want to be _a_ better Debian? or Don't you want to be

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2011-08-11 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: zsh (Debian) Status: Unknown = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 Title: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2011-02-15 Thread Axel Beckert
JFTR: The according Debian bug has been tagged and closed as wontfix. Seems as if fixing this for vi users would make all Emacs users unhappy for the very same reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2010-08-23 Thread Nigel Babu
** Also affects: zsh (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383737 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 You received this bug notification

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2010-07-13 Thread wfaulk
Any reason that this still hasn't been fixed? The override mappings are insane. They seem to come directly from Debian (where there's also a bug on it http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383737). No one seems to know how they got there in the first place. I think it's ridiculous

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-10-26 Thread Simon Olofsson
** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-10-19 Thread Ward
I just tried in Karmic and the problem is still there. It's irrelevant that most keys work as expected, they should all work as expected. This whole situation leaves me wondering why it's taking over 2 years to fix something as trivial as this. To reproduce: $ sudo apt-get install zsh $ zsh

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-10-19 Thread Simon Olofsson
Removing all keybindings as you suggested in your second patch is not an option, as this would make some keys, e.g. Home and Delete, unusable (zsh doesn't recognize them correctly by default). Removing the other keybindings may cause problems, because I don't know how zsh determines which

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-10-19 Thread Dimitrios Symeonidis
Still the case in karmic It's easy to check if this is still there by looking at the .diff.gz file in packages.ubuntu.com ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- package defaults are unfriendly for

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-10-06 Thread Simon Olofsson
I tried this in Karmic and most keys worked as expected. Anybody else tried this in Karmic? ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 You received this

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-06-24 Thread Joke de Buhr
The zsh manual says the viins mode is automatically turned on if the EDITOR environment variable contains anything linke 'vi'. http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/zsh_17.html#SEC92 The additional ubuntu keybindings cause a lot of trouble if someone exports EDITOR=vim in .zshrc and starts an

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2009-02-24 Thread Dimitrios Symeonidis
setting status to confirmed... where are we on this issue? has anyone looked at the patches proposed by ward? have they been introduced? ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- package defaults are unfriendly

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2008-09-18 Thread Daniel T Chen
** Summary changed: - very non-default zsh behaviour + package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode -- package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72054 You received this bug notification because you