On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 01:13:42AM -, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
> > bladernr@critical-maas:/var/lib/maas/boot-resources/
> > current/bootloader/uefi/amd64$
> > ll
> > total 2328
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 maas maas4096 Feb 22 17:34 ./
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 maas maas4096 Feb 22 17:34 ../
> > -rw-r--r-- 2
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Jeff Lane
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:06:51PM -, Jeff Lane wrote:
> >> > Is /efi/ubuntu/grubx64.efi on your EFI System Partition definitely the
> >> > Canonical-signed image from grub-efi-am
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:06:51PM -, Jeff Lane wrote:
>> > Is /efi/ubuntu/grubx64.efi on your EFI System Partition definitely the
>> > Canonical-signed image from grub-efi-amd64-signed?
>
>> I presume so? dpkg says it is:They look the s
This brings a good point. What I didn’t test, which will do tomorrow, is
what happens if I kill Maas and let the same system boot from disk. I
wonder if it will boot.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:20 PM Jeff Lane
wrote:
> > Is /efi/ubuntu/grubx64.efi on your EFI System Partition definitely the
> > C
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:06:51PM -, Jeff Lane wrote:
> > Is /efi/ubuntu/grubx64.efi on your EFI System Partition definitely the
> > Canonical-signed image from grub-efi-amd64-signed?
> I presume so? dpkg says it is:
> ubuntu@xwing:/boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu$ dpkg -S grubx64.efi
> grub-efi-amd64-s
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:45:17PM -, Jeff Lane wrote:
> Can we please verify that with one of the original failing systems
> (Cisco UCS C-240 M4) as well?
> Because that supermicro system works, my Lenovo fails even with the
> workaround (comments #48 and #49).
Is /efi/ubuntu/grubx64.efi on
Reviewing @slangasek's notes
> It's worth checking whether this problem
> mysteriously resolves once linux-signed is being pulled in; if it does,
> then it's possible we have a bug in grub (enforcing signature when it's
> not supposed to) or simply a bug in firmware.
It would appear that despite
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:53:18PM -, Ryan Harper wrote:
> No one in this thread has answered how MAAS or curtin
> knows that it should install the -signed version of linux-image.
It should *unconditionally* prefer the -signed version of linux-image.
--
You received this bug notification bec
No one in this thread has answered how MAAS or curtin
knows that it should install the -signed version of linux-image.
Once that knowledge is passed on, we can work out if curtin
can detect that or if maas can and specify which kernel package
to use.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Steve Langas
