On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:44:11 +, Shane Fagan shanepatrickfa...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Im saying couchdb is fundamentally flawed by the fact that there are
problems with how scalable it is. That warrants changing it because at
the numbers that are needed to sustain much more people wouldn't
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:20:41 +0100, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
joerlend.schins...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm rather dismayed by this, I have to say.
I can imagine. We (Ubuntu One) tried as much as we could (beyond what
some would call reasonable) to not have to come to this end, but, as I
said, we could
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:11:40 +0100, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
joerlend.schins...@gmail.com wrote:
I hadn't actually considered DesktopCouch to be dependent on Ubuntu One.
I considered Ubuntu Ones database synchronization service to be
dependent on the DesktopCouch, but not vice versa. Much the
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:36:29 -0400, Jeremy Bicha jbi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Alternatively, could the entire online store library be cached to
user's computers? This should speed up search and there shouldn't be a
privacy concern. It could be similar to what app-install-data does.
But how much
