Re: Remove gst0.10 this cycle?

2016-03-10 10:10 GMT+02:00 Martin Pitt : > updated in ages (like xfce4-volumed, artikulate → qtmobility, or qtmobility was part of Qt 4.x. Qt 4 as a whole was end-of-lifed in December 2015. Replacements for qtmobility functionality are in different Qt 5 modules. -Timo --

Re: Remove gst0.10 this cycle?

2016-01-28 1:24 GMT+02:00 Bryan Quigley : > gcompris - Needs sync > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcompris/+bug/1538783 I started on this earlier but this is now done, meaning Edubuntu DVD should become slightly lighter. -Timo -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list

Re: Proposed changes to default applications in 16.04 LTS

2015-11-09 18:31 GMT+02:00 Bryan Quigley : >> Gnome Calendar - to be added to the image. This brings a stand-alone >> Calendar application with integration with Unity. > I've been reviewing this since the UOS, and I'd prefer to go with > xul-ext-lightning calendar integrated

Re: 32/64 bit recommended decision rehash this vUDS?

2013/8/19 Bryan Quigley gquig...@gmail.com: I was wondering if anyone wanted to take another look at recommending 64 bit instead of 32 bit for 13.10? Hi Bryan. There is certainly interest, to reduce the confusion for users of new computers. Locally it has been clearer since ubuntu-fi defaults

Re: Default Browser Follow-up

I think additionally Chromium used to have better multi-tab performance for a long time. Ie. Firefox users got used to action stopping when some heavy javascript was running in some other tab. But Firefox 22/23 have surprisingly well now improved on that front. I've been using Firefox all the

Re: disable incomplete language support notification

2011/11/9 Carl Karsten c...@personnelware.com: trying to keep the incomplete language support alert from coming up on a fresh install. My guesstimate by looking at the package contents would be that language-selector installs /usr/share/language-support/incomplete-language-support-gnome.note

Re: Default Desktop Experience for 11.04

2011/4/8 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com: There are a lot of bugs and lack of features (and many have been fixed already as well) and the performance is quite bad in parts, but those are not as serious as a) crashers and potentially b) accessibility and lack of any help. Just reflecting

Re: Default Desktop Experience for 11.04

2011/4/8 Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com: I couldn't have believed it even two months ago still, but today I feel the same. When I switch back to classic GNOME it feels inferior now; I'm particularly missing the super-fast keyboard shortcuts/search/navigation and bigger screen real estate.

Re: Default Desktop Experience for 11.04

2011/4/8 Neil Jagdish Patel neil.pa...@canonical.com: 3.8.4 should be much, much more stable, especially if you're on a 64-bit system. The entire team is concentrated on crashers and I think we'll have a very stable Unity by hard-freeze. Sounds good, and yes I've 64-bit which explains a bit.

Re: OpenShot instead of PiTiVi

2011/2/15 Jono Bacon j...@ubuntu.com: Recently I have been using OpenShot with some good success. While there are some crasher issues, it seems the app demonstrates a great feature set and good meet the needs of our users well. It currently has 4/5 in the Ubuntu Software Center. I don't say

Re: gnome-control-center

2009/2/23 Alexander Sack a...@ubuntu.com: I find access to the various settings applications to be rather tedious and indirect through the gnome-control-center, so I prefer the way that Ubuntu does it (simply with the menus). Me too, although I understand also that some assume

Re: Unneeded System Tools menu

2008/3/31, Milan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The expression System is not the only, nor the main problem: adding a submenu when you only have 7 of them is a major change in Applications. My point exactly. categories of programs. And Tools already exists, if you don't go this way: it's called

Re: Unneeded System Tools menu

2008/3/31, Matthew East [EMAIL PROTECTED]: A better solution in my opinion would be to move the Applications - System Tools submenu to a System - Tools submenu. I agree that the current setup is very poor, for the reasons already presented. If the System - Tools is unfeasible at this point,

Re: Unneeded System Tools menu

2008/3/31, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]: using it. We used to do changes to not have it on the default installation but the system menus have lot of items and the category is quickly unmasked when installing something using it anyway Having it not used in the default installation

Re: Inkscape

Corey Burger wrote: I would also support this, but I think it should wait until Dapper+1. The major issue behind shipping Inkscape is that of space. It looks like Inkscape + libraries runs to about 9mb, not a small amount. If you'd experiment with the 7-zip (p7zip) that's been talked at