Beautiful stupidity?

2010-03-06 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
I've been reading up on the new design philosophy and it sounded nice
until I saw some actual screenshots on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brand.

Are we really going to move the window buttons (minimize, maximize and
close) to the left hand side of the window and then rearrange them?
The themes look really nice, but this is going to hurt. Most of us
have a strong muscle memory that tells us where those buttons are. New
users will feel even more uncomfortable, as this indicates further
that their old knowledge from Windows isn't applicable anymore. Most
of us are also right handed, which makes the right hand side of the
screen a good placement for such a common action.

People have suggested for a long time, that Super-L should open the
applications menu. I've been against that, since it didn't make sense
to begin with. It's stupid to copy Windows' mistakes just in order to
be similar, but in my opinion, it's even more stupid to change
something good just in order to be different.

In my opinion, this is the worst design change since the decision to
hide incoming IMs and phone calls from the user, and instead just
subtly changing the color of a small icon.

One of the things I've always touted when speaking of Ubuntu, is that
is looks ok, but that it's really user friendly, and efficient to work
with. You get much done by few clicks. Now, when someone calls me, I
have to first examine where the sound comes from, then look for the
envelope to see if it's light grey or dark grey. Then, if it's dark
grey, I have to click it to see if it's just because I've received an
email or if someone has sent me an IM while I was away, or if someone,
in fact, is calling me right now. If so, then I can open that dialog
and then, finally, I can accept the call. And now I'm supposed to
retrain my muscles to hit buttons on the other side of the screen, and
remember that minimize is now maximize and vice versa?

I'm sorry if I come across as overly critical, but this really upsets
me. It looks nice, but it's a pain to work with. Please prioritize
functionality before aesthetics.

My two cents,

Jo-Erlend Schinstad

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Review of featured applications

2010-03-06 Thread Sense Hofstede
Hello,

I think that not including Battle for Wesnoth would be a shame. This
is a very complete game with a lot of available content and it is
translated into many languages and you can even download extra
scenarios! Moreover, Wesnoth starts with a tutorial game that explains
the basics of the game mechanics in an easily understandable way.

Although not everyone might be interested in an RTS game, the same
applies to FPS games. It is good to show that there is a wide variety
of good and complete games available for Linux.

Regards,
-- 
Sense Hofstede
[ˈsɛn.sə ˈɦɔf.steːdə]

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Beautiful stupidity?

2010-03-06 Thread Gabriel Burt
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
joerlend.schins...@gmail.com wrote:
 Are we really going to move the window buttons (minimize, maximize and
 close) to the left hand side of the window and then rearrange them?

It appears those screenshots were outdated.  Quoting Ars Technica [1]:

When we posted screenshots from the design documents yesterday, the
placement of the window titlebar buttons in the Metacity theme proved
to be one of the most controversial issues. Many of our readers
expressed that they disliked the button arrangement and positioning
along the left-hand side of the titlebar. The critics will be pleased
to learn that the titlebar buttons are located in their usual place on
the right-hand side in the official theme packages.

Gabriel

[1] 
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2010/03/hands-on-a-close-look-at-ubuntus-new-non-brown-theme.ars

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Beautiful stupidity?

2010-03-06 Thread Gabriel Burt
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Gabriel Burt gabriel.b...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
 joerlend.schins...@gmail.com wrote:
 Are we really going to move the window buttons (minimize, maximize and
 close) to the left hand side of the window and then rearrange them?

 It appears those screenshots were outdated.  Quoting Ars Technica [1]:

 When we posted screenshots from the design documents yesterday, the
 placement of the window titlebar buttons in the Metacity theme proved
 to be one of the most controversial issues. Many of our readers
 expressed that they disliked the button arrangement and positioning
 along the left-hand side of the titlebar. The critics will be pleased
 to learn that the titlebar buttons are located in their usual place on
 the right-hand side in the official theme packages.

 Gabriel

 [1] 
 http://arstechnica.com/open-source/reviews/2010/03/hands-on-a-close-look-at-ubuntus-new-non-brown-theme.ars

I guess I should have read the rest of the article:

Although the designers decided to keep the buttons on the right, the
order was changed.

and

Update: In a new package updated that was rolled out this morning,
the titlebar buttons were moved to the left-hand side of the window.
You can now resume complaining.

Gabriel

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


gnome-system-tools and a bug fix

2010-03-06 Thread Erik Andersen
Hi.
Bug #433654 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/433654)
is about audio not working properly on karmic and lucid when multiple
users are used (one user gets to the audio device first and no one
else can use it). Eventually it was figured out that if users aren't
part of the audio group and consolekit is installed everything works
properly. However, the defaults for a desktop user and an
administrator users is to have them in the audio group which causes
this problem. However, if consolekit isn't installed, you have to be
part of the audio group to play sound. However, ubuntu-desktop depends
on consolekit so it is rather reasonable to assume that it will be
installed.
So, to fix the bug, should the default administrator and desktop users
be removed from the audio group?
(This was basically asked at
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+question/103004
, but it hasn't been answered yet, and I doubt the people who would
know the answer have seen it.)
Thanks,
Erik B. Andersen

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


gnome-system-tools and a bug fix

2010-03-06 Thread Erik Andersen
Hi.
Bug #433654 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/433654)
is about audio not working properly on karmic and lucid when multiple
users are used (one user gets to the audio device first and no one
else can use it). Eventually it was figured out that if users aren't
part of the audio group and consolekit is installed everything works
properly. However, the defaults for a desktop user and an
administrator users is to have them in the audio group which causes
this problem. However, if consolekit isn't installed, you have to be
part of the audio group to play sound. However, ubuntu-desktop depends
on consolekit so it is rather reasonable to assume that it will be
installed.
So, to fix the bug, should the default administrator and desktop users
be removed from the audio group?
(This was basically asked at
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+question/103004
, but it hasn't been answered yet, and I doubt the people who would
know the answer have seen it.)
Thanks,
Erik B. Andersen

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop