Ubuntu QA presents: Hardy desktop bug list

2008-02-20 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
Hello!

The Ubuntu QA team has assembled a list of bugs that we think should be 
fixed for Hardy. These are often long-standing bugs or bugs with many 
subscribers, comments or duplicates. The bugs are generally in a mature 
triage state and should be ready to work on.

The desktop list can be seen here:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~ogasawara/qa-hardy-list-archive/sort-by-package/desktop-buglist.html

Or simply as a search of the 'qa-hardy-desktop' tag in Launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=qa-hardy-desktop

Please help us close these out!

Henrik
Ubuntu QA


-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


[Bug 161960] Re: Add function to WinKey button on keyboard

2008-02-20 Thread Dylan McCall
Here is a good reason to make it so: Discoverability!

People often come to Ubuntu and wonder where the Start menu is. If
they could press the Super key (Start) and have something appear, that
would mean they quickly learn what Ubuntu has instead. People must think
outside of the anti-Windows thing here. The Start key may have been
inspired by Microsoft's main menu, but that does not mean it should be
ignored. It does not say Windows' Start Menu; it says Start. Start
can mean whatever we make it to mean, and it can most definitely apply
here. I think that it makes sense for that key to mean and do what it
tends to say these days, which is to start the user off. No, the menu
does not have to say Start for that to make sense. I, for one, would
prefer if the menu did not since having two Starts would be redundant.

The Super key could be effectively mapped to either GNOME's main menu
applet, or to Deskbar. Both of those applets are present by default and
offer a great way of starting off one's journey into Ubuntu.

Either one could be achieved via a fairly straight-forward patch that
changes default settings for the respective application. I'll see what I
can do myself, although I must admit to having never looked at either
application (and I am a bit lost as to what project is ultimately in
charge of GNOME's hotkeys).

-- 
Add function to WinKey button on keyboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: [Bug 161960] Re: Add function to WinKey button on keyboard

2008-02-20 Thread Labyrinth
 It doesn't take more than five minutes to learn how to configure keyboard
 shortcuts, but
 it must be learned.


Why should it need to  be learned?
Why make it hard for new users if we can easily pre-map a key to the
application menu?

-- 
Add function to WinKey button on keyboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


[Bug 161960] Re: Add function to WinKey button on keyboard

2008-02-20 Thread Jo-Erlend Schinstad
Have you ever seen the disbelief on Windows users faces when you tell
them there aren't any viruses for Linux? They're so used to it, they
think it's completely natural for an operating system to have viruses.
But it's not. The question isn't why Ubuntu doesn't have the same
default keyboard shortcuts as Windows. The question is, why would Super
L be a good choice for the Applications menu? The fact that Windows has
a similar menu pop up when someone presses it, is not a good reason. Why
should it need to be learned? Because if we mimic Windows too closely
just to be similar, people will make other assumptions too. Ubuntu is a
different system with its own philosophy. It must be learned.

-- 
Add function to WinKey button on keyboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: [Bug 161960] Re: Add function to WinKey button on keyboard

2008-02-20 Thread Dylan McCall
I think you are looking at this from a completely unnecessary and, frankly,
foolish perspective.
Microsoft's Windows renders GUI applications into different blocks
(windows), each with their own externally controlled Close, Minimize and
Maximize buttons. The fact is, people expect this and it is an intuitive
choice.

Similarly, Super L says Start on it 99% of the time (number pulled from
thin air, but can't be far off!). In addition, it is mapped to nothing by
default. What harm is there in mapping it to something? I for one prefer
using Super as a modifier key for all my Compiz plugins, but as one who has
been converted and adapted to Ubuntu and the joys of customization, I do not
mind in the slightest the idea of going and turning that event-stealing
functionality off.
As for the claim that We shouldn't look like Windows!!, I would like to
point you to a recent change in Ubuntu, which added symlinks simulating
Windows' shell commands. (For example, dir). There are a lot of Windows
users out there, and it certainly does not hurt to help them along. There is
absolutely no harm in either of these things. How can I say that? Well, did
you notice that you can type dir in the shell and have it do something?
Has that change come out and eaten your hand off?
Thought not.

The claim that Ubuntu must be learned is an interesting one. I accept that I
would scream in horror if somebody gave me Linux command line directions
using dir and the like, but it can't be learned at all if the first step
to learning is a tricky one. Our job is to make it as easy as possible so
that people do not *need* to read the documentation. The system should make
sense on its own.
Super L triggering a function that resembles Starting is a relatively
simple concept, unlikely to harm anyone, and no more intrusive than the
Windows shell symlinks -- and those have proven quite painless so far.

Now, back to the topic at hand: Implementation!


On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Have you ever seen the disbelief on Windows users faces when you tell
 them there aren't any viruses for Linux? They're so used to it, they
 think it's completely natural for an operating system to have viruses.
 But it's not. The question isn't why Ubuntu doesn't have the same
 default keyboard shortcuts as Windows. The question is, why would Super
 L be a good choice for the Applications menu? The fact that Windows has
 a similar menu pop up when someone presses it, is not a good reason. Why
 should it need to be learned? Because if we mimic Windows too closely
 just to be similar, people will make other assumptions too. Ubuntu is a
 different system with its own philosophy. It must be learned.

 --
 Add function to WinKey button on keyboard
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161960
 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
 Desktop, which is a direct subscriber.

 --
 ubuntu-desktop mailing list
 ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


-- 
Add function to WinKey button on keyboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop


Re: Getting a usability patch into gnome-panel package?

2008-02-20 Thread Greg K Nicholson

On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 02:43 +, Greg K Nicholson wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 17:52 +1300, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
  
  Greg K Nicholson wrote on 14/02/08 03:05:
   
   Epiphany and Firefox could adopt the same behavior in their Bookmarks
   menus.
   
   In which case Alt-dragging wouldn't move the window as usual.
  ...
  
  It already doesn't, and probably never has. In Epiphany the modifier is
  ignored, and in Firefox it (probably accidentally) closes the menu.
 
 Is that by design (and if so, what's the rationale behind it?) or is it
 simply a bug that should be fixed?

Actually, here (on Hardy, using Firefox 3 beta 3) Alt-dragging the
window works as expected.



-- 
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop