Hi all,
I've been working on multitouch, trackpads, and anything in between for
a while now. There's a couple issues that we need to consider for 12.04.
* When the user checks "Enable mouse clicks with touchpad", I believe
the "Synaptics Locked Drags" setting should be true. Currently, when the
u
On 02/06/2012 05:49 AM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> On 06. feb. 2012 10:22, Jason Warner wrote:
>> Hi All -
>>
>> Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some
>> of the question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think it
>> is less interesting for Ubuntu.
>>
>
> Y
Is the concern that high-severity patches wont be backported from Firefox
11 (or 12 or 13 or 14...)? We should be getting high-severity patches from
upstream through the ESR lifecycle (
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/)
People run their businesses on LTS releases. They need
On 6 February 2012 06:50, Jason Warner wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Viktor Basso wrote:
>>
>> Yes!
>> The LTS should be secure, stable and supported. Not "better, faster,
>> braver" as Jason pointed out.
>
>
> And what if we could be both? ;) In fact, we can. By embracing Firefox
Il 06/02/2012 15:00, Alex Schoof ha scritto:
The WHOLE POINT of an LTS release is that its a consistent,
predictable platform where things won't just change out from under you.
If I'm an admin that rolls out 12.04 across my company, and make sure
everything works, maybe write some custom too
I disagree. If organizations (or individuals) want the latest and greatest,
then they'll upgrade their ubuntu every 6 months and get the newest
Firefox, unity, etc. The WHOLE POINT of an LTS release is that its a
consistent, predictable platform where things won't just change out from
under you.
I
On 02/05/2012 04:56 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
On 05. feb. 2012 15:05, Petko wrote:
And for Ubuntu One - I'm pretty sure its place isn't in the Messages
menu .
Category indicator menus are for actionable indications that belongs
to a category. When I send you an invitation, it is not
On 02/06/2012 12:50 PM, Jason Warner wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Viktor Basso wrote:
Yes!
The LTS should be secure, stable and supported. Not "better,
faster, braver" as Jason pointed out.
And what if we could be both? ;) In fact, we can. By embracing Firefox
proper
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Viktor Basso wrote:
> Yes!
> The LTS should be secure, stable and supported. Not "better, faster,
> braver" as Jason pointed out.
>
And what if we could be both? ;) In fact, we can. By embracing Firefox
proper rather than ESR, we are getting the current browser t
On 06. feb. 2012 10:22, Jason Warner wrote:
Hi All -
Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some of
the question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think it is
less interesting for Ubuntu.
You have to understand that my original post was not meant as a
pr
On Mon 06 Feb 2012 12:23:37 PM CET, Petko wrote:
On 02/06/2012 12:14 PM, Viktor Basso wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Hi All -
Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some
of the question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think
it is less
On 02/06/2012 12:14 PM, Viktor Basso wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Hi All -
Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some
of the question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think it
is less interesting for Ubuntu.
Firefox adopted a rapid
On 02/06/2012 10:22 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Hi All -
Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some of
the question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think it is
less interesting for Ubuntu.
Firefox adopted a rapid release model for various reasons, but among
On 06/02/12 09:22, Jason Warner wrote:
Hi All -
Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some of
the question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think it is
less interesting for Ubuntu.
Firefox adopted a rapid release model for various reasons, but among
them was
Hi All -
Firefox ESR is indeed interesting, and it would seem to answer some of the
question corporations might have about Firefox, but I think it is less
interesting for Ubuntu.
Firefox adopted a rapid release model for various reasons, but among them
was that they needed the browser to keep up
On 04.02.2012 15:51, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
In Precise we've upgraded to version 11 of both Firefox and Thunderbird.
But the reason for starting to upgrade frequently was said to be that
Mozillas support periods were limited for newer versions after 3.6. But
now we have the 10ESR versions of
16 matches
Mail list logo
