On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:20 AM, AWASHIRO Ikuya wrote:
> I don't understand what is the problem well, IBus 1.4.99.20121006 still
> have Global input method settings.
The problem is that it enforces global input source state now.
In 1.4 it is configurable, you can have either local (per window /
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:55:56 -0600
Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> You are not concerned with the global state issue?
I don't understand what is the problem well, IBus 1.4.99.20121006 still
have Global input method settings.
Thanks,
--
AWASHIRO Ikuya
ik...@fruitsbasket.info / ik...@oooug.jp / iku...@gmail.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:47 PM, AWASHIRO Ikuya wrote:
> $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:jbicha/ibus
> $ sudo apt-get update;sudo apt-get upgrade
> $ gsettings set com.canonical.Unity.Panel systray-whitelist
> "['JavaEmbeddedFrame', 'Wine', 'Update-notifier', 'ibus']"
> $ gsettings set org.gnome.se
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:13:10 +0100
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Our options, if we stay on the current ibus, are:
> - stay on g-s-d/g-c-c 3.4 (the current version)
> - update g-s-d/g-c-c to 3.6 fully using the upstream code without
> building with ibus (they have a fallback mode without ibus i
Sorry for not repeating the list previously, jbicha.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I believe the design plan was basically that the indicator should "do
> like what it did in Quantal…unless we can do it better".
I repeat, current IBus indicator isn't working right becaus
On 20 November 2012 16:59, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-r-gnome-fallback
>>
>> I don't think work on porting the indicator patch to ibus 1.4.99 has
>> really started yet. Seb was looking at it, which sparked this
>> discussion.
>
> You need to be clear
On 21/11/12 07:13, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've been looking at the new ibus/g-s-d/g-c-c stack recently to update
> in raring and I'm not convinced it's a good idea to update to those.
> We have discussed the issue a bit on IRC today but I figured I would
> write an email to the list to
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2012/11/20/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t14:59 until 16:30
OK, I will try to stay there since now, not to miss such discussions.
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-r-gnome-fallback
>
> I don't think w
On 20 November 2012 15:31, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>> I've been looking at the new ibus/g-s-d/g-c-c stack recently to update in
>> raring and I'm not convinced it's a good idea to update to those. We have
>> discussed the issue a bit on IRC to
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> I've been looking at the new ibus/g-s-d/g-c-c stack recently to update in
> raring and I'm not convinced it's a good idea to update to those. We have
> discussed the issue a bit on IRC today but I figured I would write an email
> to the l
Hey,
I've been looking at the new ibus/g-s-d/g-c-c stack recently to update
in raring and I'm not convinced it's a good idea to update to those. We
have discussed the issue a bit on IRC today but I figured I would write
an email to the list to document and share the thinking.
There seem to b
11 matches
Mail list logo
