Re: Ubuntu policy for WebKit security updates?

2016-09-13 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Adam Dingle wrote: > 1. WebKit 1 contains many security vulnerabilities that will probably never > be fixed, and yet some apps (e.g. Geary, GnuCash) still depend on it. As of the current 16.10 daily iso's, the only Ubuntu flavor that still includes WebKit 1 in the

Re: Ubuntu policy for WebKit security updates?

2016-09-13 Thread Adam Dingle
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Marc Deslauriers wrote: Hi, On 2016-09-13 05:14 PM, Adam Dingle wrote: This article from Michael Catanzaro is sobering: https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/ It essentially makes two points: 1. WebKit 1 contains

Re: Ubuntu policy for WebKit security updates?

2016-09-13 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Hi, On 2016-09-13 05:14 PM, Adam Dingle wrote: > This article from Michael Catanzaro is sobering: > > https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/ > > It essentially makes two points: > > 1. WebKit 1 contains many security vulnerabilities that will probably never

Ubuntu policy for WebKit security updates?

2016-09-13 Thread Adam Dingle
This article from Michael Catanzaro is sobering: https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/ It essentially makes two points: 1. WebKit 1 contains many security vulnerabilities that will probably never be fixed, and yet some apps (e.g. Geary, GnuCash) still dep