Re: [Oneiric-Topic] GTK3/GNOME3

2011-04-11 Thread Vishnoo
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:21 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Hi, The idea was never really dropped but it's not likely it will be an official focus for the team, contributions to help getting it working better are welcome

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Default Browser

2011-04-08 Thread Vishnoo
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 17:27 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote: Please note, I was suggesting not having Firefox or Chromium as the default, but a webkit based browser with a normal release cycle like Epiphany (which uses webkitgtk :)). If I'v understood that right, what you are suggesting is we use

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] GTK3/GNOME3

2011-04-07 Thread Vishnoo
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:32 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit : kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see the following particular challenges:

Re: New GNOME Icon's In Natty?

2011-03-28 Thread Vishnoo
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:16 -0700, Jono Bacon wrote: Hi all, Some of you may have seen http://jimmac.musichall.cz/log/?p=1145 - some fantastic work on the icon theme going into the next GNOME release. I wanted to see if there is any possibility of bringing those icons into Natty? Hi

Re: Beautiful stupidity?

2010-03-09 Thread Vishnoo
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 10:30 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote: On Tuesday 09 March 2010 07:04:53 am Vishnoo wrote: Now that it was fixed[in Humanity] for Lucid , the design team _again_ has a new icon far worse than what was earlier. Again not an Ubuntu decision? Now where is the decision being

Re: Beautiful stupidity?

2010-03-08 Thread Vishnoo
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:54 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote on 06/03/10 16:14: ... In my opinion, this is the worst design change since the decision to hide incoming IMs and phone calls from the user, and instead

Re: Lucid changes to Firefox default search provider

2010-02-23 Thread Vishnoo
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:21 -0600, Richard JOHNSON wrote: On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:45:53AM -0500, Alain-Olivier Breysse wrote: Bonjour, The motivation of your decision is already being talked about around the net in many different languages, and because it is the net, will continue

Re: Lucid changes to Firefox default search provider

2010-01-27 Thread Vishnoo
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 12:03 -0800, Rick Spencer wrote: All - Why? I am pursuing this change because Canonical has negotiated a revenue sharing deal with Yahoo! and this revenue will help Canonical to provide developers and resources to continue the open development of Ubuntu and the