Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-22 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:06 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/21/2011 11:49 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead.

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-22 Thread Tony Espy
On 04/22/2011 10:27 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:06 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/21/2011 11:49 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-21 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. == Currently Ubuntu contains two separate sleep functions, suspend and

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-21 Thread Tony Espy
On 04/21/2011 11:49 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. == Currently Ubuntu contains two

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-20 Thread Didier Roche
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 17:38 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers a écrit : I think that reliability will be the determining factor in whether this is usable or not. This behaviour would be a win if I don't have to worry that hibernate's not going to work - or that my laptop's going to